Cargando…

Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?

Septic shock is a medical emergency that is associated with mortality rates of 40–70%. Prompt recognition and institution of effective therapy is required for optimal outcome. When the shock state persists after adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy is required to improve and maintain ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Gourang P, Balk, Robert A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18001504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6159
_version_ 1782150738599739392
author Patel, Gourang P
Balk, Robert A
author_facet Patel, Gourang P
Balk, Robert A
author_sort Patel, Gourang P
collection PubMed
description Septic shock is a medical emergency that is associated with mortality rates of 40–70%. Prompt recognition and institution of effective therapy is required for optimal outcome. When the shock state persists after adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy is required to improve and maintain adequate tissue/organ perfusion in an attempt to improve survival and prevent the development of multiple organ dysfunction and failure. Controversy surrounding the optimum choice of vasopressor strategy to utilize in the management of patients with septic shock continues. A recent randomized study of epinephrine compared to norepinephrine (plus dobutamine when indicated) leads to more questions than answers.
format Text
id pubmed-2246199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22461992008-02-20 Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter? Patel, Gourang P Balk, Robert A Crit Care Commentary Septic shock is a medical emergency that is associated with mortality rates of 40–70%. Prompt recognition and institution of effective therapy is required for optimal outcome. When the shock state persists after adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy is required to improve and maintain adequate tissue/organ perfusion in an attempt to improve survival and prevent the development of multiple organ dysfunction and failure. Controversy surrounding the optimum choice of vasopressor strategy to utilize in the management of patients with septic shock continues. A recent randomized study of epinephrine compared to norepinephrine (plus dobutamine when indicated) leads to more questions than answers. BioMed Central 2007 2007-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2246199/ /pubmed/18001504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6159 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Patel, Gourang P
Balk, Robert A
Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?
title Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?
title_full Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?
title_fullStr Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?
title_full_unstemmed Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?
title_short Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?
title_sort choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18001504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6159
work_keys_str_mv AT patelgourangp choiceofvasopressorinsepticshockdoesitmatter
AT balkroberta choiceofvasopressorinsepticshockdoesitmatter