Cargando…
Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?
Septic shock is a medical emergency that is associated with mortality rates of 40–70%. Prompt recognition and institution of effective therapy is required for optimal outcome. When the shock state persists after adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy is required to improve and maintain ad...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18001504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6159 |
_version_ | 1782150738599739392 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Gourang P Balk, Robert A |
author_facet | Patel, Gourang P Balk, Robert A |
author_sort | Patel, Gourang P |
collection | PubMed |
description | Septic shock is a medical emergency that is associated with mortality rates of 40–70%. Prompt recognition and institution of effective therapy is required for optimal outcome. When the shock state persists after adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy is required to improve and maintain adequate tissue/organ perfusion in an attempt to improve survival and prevent the development of multiple organ dysfunction and failure. Controversy surrounding the optimum choice of vasopressor strategy to utilize in the management of patients with septic shock continues. A recent randomized study of epinephrine compared to norepinephrine (plus dobutamine when indicated) leads to more questions than answers. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2246199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22461992008-02-20 Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter? Patel, Gourang P Balk, Robert A Crit Care Commentary Septic shock is a medical emergency that is associated with mortality rates of 40–70%. Prompt recognition and institution of effective therapy is required for optimal outcome. When the shock state persists after adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy is required to improve and maintain adequate tissue/organ perfusion in an attempt to improve survival and prevent the development of multiple organ dysfunction and failure. Controversy surrounding the optimum choice of vasopressor strategy to utilize in the management of patients with septic shock continues. A recent randomized study of epinephrine compared to norepinephrine (plus dobutamine when indicated) leads to more questions than answers. BioMed Central 2007 2007-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2246199/ /pubmed/18001504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6159 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Patel, Gourang P Balk, Robert A Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter? |
title | Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter? |
title_full | Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter? |
title_fullStr | Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter? |
title_short | Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter? |
title_sort | choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18001504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelgourangp choiceofvasopressorinsepticshockdoesitmatter AT balkroberta choiceofvasopressorinsepticshockdoesitmatter |