Cargando…

Evaluation of MSA as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with CEA.

In a blind study, 518 serum samples were assayed for serum levels of mammary serum antigen (MSA) by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using the 3E1.2 monoclonal antibody. Using 300 IU as the arbitrary cut off to distinguish normal from abnormal individuals, 75% of patients with primary Stage I carcinoma o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stacker, S. A., Sacks, N. P., Golder, J., Tjandra, J. J., Thompson, C. H., Smithyman, A., McKenzie, I. F.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1988
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3355770
_version_ 1782150785736376320
author Stacker, S. A.
Sacks, N. P.
Golder, J.
Tjandra, J. J.
Thompson, C. H.
Smithyman, A.
McKenzie, I. F.
author_facet Stacker, S. A.
Sacks, N. P.
Golder, J.
Tjandra, J. J.
Thompson, C. H.
Smithyman, A.
McKenzie, I. F.
author_sort Stacker, S. A.
collection PubMed
description In a blind study, 518 serum samples were assayed for serum levels of mammary serum antigen (MSA) by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using the 3E1.2 monoclonal antibody. Using 300 IU as the arbitrary cut off to distinguish normal from abnormal individuals, 75% of patients with primary Stage I carcinoma of the breast (n = 12), 89% of those with Stage II (n = 9) and 93% of those with Stage IV (n = 57) had elevated levels of MSA. A relationship was observed between the level of MSA and stage of disease, and therefore with the extent of tumour burden. Levels of MSA were also determined in a series of 19 patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. Over a 2-24 month period, the change of MSA levels corresponded with the clinical course of the disease in 17 (89%) cases. MSA levels were also raised in some patients with ovarian, colon, lung and kidney cancer, but the average level was lower than in patients with breast cancer. A comparison of CEA and MSA levels in these patients revealed that MSA was a substantially better marker for breast cancer than CEA. The results of this study demonstrate that MSA levels are elevated in patients with breast cancer and may provide a useful means of following the clinical course of patients with this disease.
format Text
id pubmed-2246506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1988
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22465062009-09-10 Evaluation of MSA as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with CEA. Stacker, S. A. Sacks, N. P. Golder, J. Tjandra, J. J. Thompson, C. H. Smithyman, A. McKenzie, I. F. Br J Cancer Research Article In a blind study, 518 serum samples were assayed for serum levels of mammary serum antigen (MSA) by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using the 3E1.2 monoclonal antibody. Using 300 IU as the arbitrary cut off to distinguish normal from abnormal individuals, 75% of patients with primary Stage I carcinoma of the breast (n = 12), 89% of those with Stage II (n = 9) and 93% of those with Stage IV (n = 57) had elevated levels of MSA. A relationship was observed between the level of MSA and stage of disease, and therefore with the extent of tumour burden. Levels of MSA were also determined in a series of 19 patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. Over a 2-24 month period, the change of MSA levels corresponded with the clinical course of the disease in 17 (89%) cases. MSA levels were also raised in some patients with ovarian, colon, lung and kidney cancer, but the average level was lower than in patients with breast cancer. A comparison of CEA and MSA levels in these patients revealed that MSA was a substantially better marker for breast cancer than CEA. The results of this study demonstrate that MSA levels are elevated in patients with breast cancer and may provide a useful means of following the clinical course of patients with this disease. Nature Publishing Group 1988-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2246506/ /pubmed/3355770 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stacker, S. A.
Sacks, N. P.
Golder, J.
Tjandra, J. J.
Thompson, C. H.
Smithyman, A.
McKenzie, I. F.
Evaluation of MSA as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with CEA.
title Evaluation of MSA as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with CEA.
title_full Evaluation of MSA as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with CEA.
title_fullStr Evaluation of MSA as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with CEA.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of MSA as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with CEA.
title_short Evaluation of MSA as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with CEA.
title_sort evaluation of msa as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with cea.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3355770
work_keys_str_mv AT stackersa evaluationofmsaasaserummarkerinbreastcanceracomparisonwithcea
AT sacksnp evaluationofmsaasaserummarkerinbreastcanceracomparisonwithcea
AT golderj evaluationofmsaasaserummarkerinbreastcanceracomparisonwithcea
AT tjandrajj evaluationofmsaasaserummarkerinbreastcanceracomparisonwithcea
AT thompsonch evaluationofmsaasaserummarkerinbreastcanceracomparisonwithcea
AT smithymana evaluationofmsaasaserummarkerinbreastcanceracomparisonwithcea
AT mckenzieif evaluationofmsaasaserummarkerinbreastcanceracomparisonwithcea