Cargando…
Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare.
Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin are three of the most active single agents in the chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. We have combined them for a phase 2 study in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. The regimen ('MIC') comprised: mitomycin 6 mg m-2, ifosfamide...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1988
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2846024 |
_version_ | 1782150805822898176 |
---|---|
author | Cullen, M. H. Joshi, R. Chetiyawardana, A. D. Woodroffe, C. M. |
author_facet | Cullen, M. H. Joshi, R. Chetiyawardana, A. D. Woodroffe, C. M. |
author_sort | Cullen, M. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin are three of the most active single agents in the chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. We have combined them for a phase 2 study in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. The regimen ('MIC') comprised: mitomycin 6 mg m-2, ifosfamide 3 g m-2 and cis-platin 50 mg m-2, with routine use of lorazepam, dexamethasone and high dose metoclopramide for anti-emesis. Seventy-four ambulatory patients with untreated, limited (LD) or extensive (ED) disease have entered this study, and 66 are evaluable for response. Thirty patients (45%) have achieved partial remission and 7 (11%) complete remission, as assessed radiologically. The overall response rate is thus 56% (95% confidence interval 44%-68%). There have been 29/43 responses in LD (67%, 95% CI 53%-81%) and 8/23 in ED (35%, 95% CI 15%-55%). The median response duration, measured from the start of treatment is 8.75 months. The median survival for the whole group is 9.2 months. The principal toxicity was nausea and vomiting which was severe or prolonged (greater than 48 h) for one or more courses, in 9% of patients. Performance status (PS) and weight were assessed before, and 3 weeks after the last course of chemotherapy. Fifteen (of 31 evaluable) responders improved their PS and only 1 responder deteriorated. Twenty-one of the 28 evaluable non-responders had no change in PS. The difference in PS change between responders and non-responders is highly significant (P = 0.002). Thirty evaluable responders experienced a mean increase in weight of 2.9% with treatment, whereas 24 evaluable non-responders had a mean weight loss of 3.8%. This change is also highly significant (P = 0.0013). MIC is clearly a well tolerated regime and among the most active combinations in non-small cell lung cancer. It will now be tested in a randomized trial against no chemotherapy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2246601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1988 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22466012009-09-10 Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare. Cullen, M. H. Joshi, R. Chetiyawardana, A. D. Woodroffe, C. M. Br J Cancer Research Article Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin are three of the most active single agents in the chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. We have combined them for a phase 2 study in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. The regimen ('MIC') comprised: mitomycin 6 mg m-2, ifosfamide 3 g m-2 and cis-platin 50 mg m-2, with routine use of lorazepam, dexamethasone and high dose metoclopramide for anti-emesis. Seventy-four ambulatory patients with untreated, limited (LD) or extensive (ED) disease have entered this study, and 66 are evaluable for response. Thirty patients (45%) have achieved partial remission and 7 (11%) complete remission, as assessed radiologically. The overall response rate is thus 56% (95% confidence interval 44%-68%). There have been 29/43 responses in LD (67%, 95% CI 53%-81%) and 8/23 in ED (35%, 95% CI 15%-55%). The median response duration, measured from the start of treatment is 8.75 months. The median survival for the whole group is 9.2 months. The principal toxicity was nausea and vomiting which was severe or prolonged (greater than 48 h) for one or more courses, in 9% of patients. Performance status (PS) and weight were assessed before, and 3 weeks after the last course of chemotherapy. Fifteen (of 31 evaluable) responders improved their PS and only 1 responder deteriorated. Twenty-one of the 28 evaluable non-responders had no change in PS. The difference in PS change between responders and non-responders is highly significant (P = 0.002). Thirty evaluable responders experienced a mean increase in weight of 2.9% with treatment, whereas 24 evaluable non-responders had a mean weight loss of 3.8%. This change is also highly significant (P = 0.0013). MIC is clearly a well tolerated regime and among the most active combinations in non-small cell lung cancer. It will now be tested in a randomized trial against no chemotherapy. Nature Publishing Group 1988-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2246601/ /pubmed/2846024 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cullen, M. H. Joshi, R. Chetiyawardana, A. D. Woodroffe, C. M. Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare. |
title | Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare. |
title_full | Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare. |
title_fullStr | Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare. |
title_full_unstemmed | Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare. |
title_short | Mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare. |
title_sort | mitomycin, ifosfamide and cis-platin in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment good enough to compare. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2846024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cullenmh mitomycinifosfamideandcisplatininnonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentgoodenoughtocompare AT joshir mitomycinifosfamideandcisplatininnonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentgoodenoughtocompare AT chetiyawardanaad mitomycinifosfamideandcisplatininnonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentgoodenoughtocompare AT woodroffecm mitomycinifosfamideandcisplatininnonsmallcelllungcancertreatmentgoodenoughtocompare |