Cargando…
A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients.
In order to assess the role of maintenance melphalan and prednisone (MP) in responding multiple myeloma patients, 185 eligible patients who responded to initial MP with stabilization for at least 4 months were randomized to either stop treatment and resume therapy at relapse or to continue MP until...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1988
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3279997 |
_version_ | 1782150823014301696 |
---|---|
author | Belch, A. Shelley, W. Bergsagel, D. Wilson, K. Klimo, P. White, D. Willan, A. |
author_facet | Belch, A. Shelley, W. Bergsagel, D. Wilson, K. Klimo, P. White, D. Willan, A. |
author_sort | Belch, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to assess the role of maintenance melphalan and prednisone (MP) in responding multiple myeloma patients, 185 eligible patients who responded to initial MP with stabilization for at least 4 months were randomized to either stop treatment and resume therapy at relapse or to continue MP until relapse. Time to first relapse was significantly shorter in the no maintenance group (P = 0.0011), however 57% of the no maintenance patients had a second response when MP was restarted and others had minor improvement. The time to final progression on MP, which reflects the duration of disease control by MP, was therefore longer for the no maintenance group (median = 39 months) compared to the maintenance group (median = 31 months) although the observed difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.086). Median survival from start of MP in the maintenance group (46 months) was also not significantly different than the no maintenance group (51 months) (P = 0.587). Multifactor analysis of the randomized patients demonstrated shorter total remission duration and shorter survival in patients who had an initially rapid response to therapy or a lesser reduction in serum M-protein concentration. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2246700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1988 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22467002009-09-10 A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. Belch, A. Shelley, W. Bergsagel, D. Wilson, K. Klimo, P. White, D. Willan, A. Br J Cancer Research Article In order to assess the role of maintenance melphalan and prednisone (MP) in responding multiple myeloma patients, 185 eligible patients who responded to initial MP with stabilization for at least 4 months were randomized to either stop treatment and resume therapy at relapse or to continue MP until relapse. Time to first relapse was significantly shorter in the no maintenance group (P = 0.0011), however 57% of the no maintenance patients had a second response when MP was restarted and others had minor improvement. The time to final progression on MP, which reflects the duration of disease control by MP, was therefore longer for the no maintenance group (median = 39 months) compared to the maintenance group (median = 31 months) although the observed difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.086). Median survival from start of MP in the maintenance group (46 months) was also not significantly different than the no maintenance group (51 months) (P = 0.587). Multifactor analysis of the randomized patients demonstrated shorter total remission duration and shorter survival in patients who had an initially rapid response to therapy or a lesser reduction in serum M-protein concentration. Nature Publishing Group 1988-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2246700/ /pubmed/3279997 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Belch, A. Shelley, W. Bergsagel, D. Wilson, K. Klimo, P. White, D. Willan, A. A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. |
title | A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. |
title_full | A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. |
title_fullStr | A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. |
title_short | A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. |
title_sort | randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3279997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belcha arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT shelleyw arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT bergsageld arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT wilsonk arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT klimop arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT whited arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT willana arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT belcha randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT shelleyw randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT bergsageld randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT wilsonk randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT klimop randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT whited randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients AT willana randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients |