Cargando…

A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients.

In order to assess the role of maintenance melphalan and prednisone (MP) in responding multiple myeloma patients, 185 eligible patients who responded to initial MP with stabilization for at least 4 months were randomized to either stop treatment and resume therapy at relapse or to continue MP until...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belch, A., Shelley, W., Bergsagel, D., Wilson, K., Klimo, P., White, D., Willan, A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1988
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3279997
_version_ 1782150823014301696
author Belch, A.
Shelley, W.
Bergsagel, D.
Wilson, K.
Klimo, P.
White, D.
Willan, A.
author_facet Belch, A.
Shelley, W.
Bergsagel, D.
Wilson, K.
Klimo, P.
White, D.
Willan, A.
author_sort Belch, A.
collection PubMed
description In order to assess the role of maintenance melphalan and prednisone (MP) in responding multiple myeloma patients, 185 eligible patients who responded to initial MP with stabilization for at least 4 months were randomized to either stop treatment and resume therapy at relapse or to continue MP until relapse. Time to first relapse was significantly shorter in the no maintenance group (P = 0.0011), however 57% of the no maintenance patients had a second response when MP was restarted and others had minor improvement. The time to final progression on MP, which reflects the duration of disease control by MP, was therefore longer for the no maintenance group (median = 39 months) compared to the maintenance group (median = 31 months) although the observed difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.086). Median survival from start of MP in the maintenance group (46 months) was also not significantly different than the no maintenance group (51 months) (P = 0.587). Multifactor analysis of the randomized patients demonstrated shorter total remission duration and shorter survival in patients who had an initially rapid response to therapy or a lesser reduction in serum M-protein concentration.
format Text
id pubmed-2246700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1988
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22467002009-09-10 A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. Belch, A. Shelley, W. Bergsagel, D. Wilson, K. Klimo, P. White, D. Willan, A. Br J Cancer Research Article In order to assess the role of maintenance melphalan and prednisone (MP) in responding multiple myeloma patients, 185 eligible patients who responded to initial MP with stabilization for at least 4 months were randomized to either stop treatment and resume therapy at relapse or to continue MP until relapse. Time to first relapse was significantly shorter in the no maintenance group (P = 0.0011), however 57% of the no maintenance patients had a second response when MP was restarted and others had minor improvement. The time to final progression on MP, which reflects the duration of disease control by MP, was therefore longer for the no maintenance group (median = 39 months) compared to the maintenance group (median = 31 months) although the observed difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.086). Median survival from start of MP in the maintenance group (46 months) was also not significantly different than the no maintenance group (51 months) (P = 0.587). Multifactor analysis of the randomized patients demonstrated shorter total remission duration and shorter survival in patients who had an initially rapid response to therapy or a lesser reduction in serum M-protein concentration. Nature Publishing Group 1988-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2246700/ /pubmed/3279997 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Belch, A.
Shelley, W.
Bergsagel, D.
Wilson, K.
Klimo, P.
White, D.
Willan, A.
A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients.
title A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients.
title_full A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients.
title_fullStr A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients.
title_full_unstemmed A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients.
title_short A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients.
title_sort randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3279997
work_keys_str_mv AT belcha arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT shelleyw arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT bergsageld arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT wilsonk arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT klimop arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT whited arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT willana arandomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT belcha randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT shelleyw randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT bergsageld randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT wilsonk randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT klimop randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT whited randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients
AT willana randomizedtrialofmaintenanceversusnomaintenancemelphalanandprednisoneinrespondingmultiplemyelomapatients