Cargando…

Quantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable?

BACKGROUND: Increased variability in sexually selected ornaments, a key assumption of evolutionary theory, is thought to be maintained through condition-dependence. Condition-dependent handicap models of sexual selection predict that (a) sexually selected traits show amplified variability compared t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delhey, Kaspar, Peters, Anne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18301766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001689
_version_ 1782151106563932160
author Delhey, Kaspar
Peters, Anne
author_facet Delhey, Kaspar
Peters, Anne
author_sort Delhey, Kaspar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increased variability in sexually selected ornaments, a key assumption of evolutionary theory, is thought to be maintained through condition-dependence. Condition-dependent handicap models of sexual selection predict that (a) sexually selected traits show amplified variability compared to equivalent non-sexually selected traits, and since males are usually the sexually selected sex, that (b) males are more variable than females, and (c) sexually dimorphic traits more variable than monomorphic ones. So far these predictions have only been tested for metric traits. Surprisingly, they have not been examined for bright coloration, one of the most prominent sexual traits. This omission stems from computational difficulties: different types of colours are quantified on different scales precluding the use of coefficients of variation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Based on physiological models of avian colour vision we develop an index to quantify the degree of discriminable colour variation as it can be perceived by conspecifics. A comparison of variability in ornamental and non-ornamental colours in six bird species confirmed (a) that those coloured patches that are sexually selected or act as indicators of quality show increased chromatic variability. However, we found no support for (b) that males generally show higher levels of variability than females, or (c) that sexual dichromatism per se is associated with increased variability. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We show that it is currently possible to realistically estimate variability of animal colours as perceived by them, something difficult to achieve with other traits. Increased variability of known sexually-selected/quality-indicating colours in the studied species, provides support to the predictions borne from sexual selection theory but the lack of increased overall variability in males or dimorphic colours in general indicates that sexual differences might not always be shaped by similar selective forces.
format Text
id pubmed-2253496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22534962008-02-27 Quantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable? Delhey, Kaspar Peters, Anne PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Increased variability in sexually selected ornaments, a key assumption of evolutionary theory, is thought to be maintained through condition-dependence. Condition-dependent handicap models of sexual selection predict that (a) sexually selected traits show amplified variability compared to equivalent non-sexually selected traits, and since males are usually the sexually selected sex, that (b) males are more variable than females, and (c) sexually dimorphic traits more variable than monomorphic ones. So far these predictions have only been tested for metric traits. Surprisingly, they have not been examined for bright coloration, one of the most prominent sexual traits. This omission stems from computational difficulties: different types of colours are quantified on different scales precluding the use of coefficients of variation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Based on physiological models of avian colour vision we develop an index to quantify the degree of discriminable colour variation as it can be perceived by conspecifics. A comparison of variability in ornamental and non-ornamental colours in six bird species confirmed (a) that those coloured patches that are sexually selected or act as indicators of quality show increased chromatic variability. However, we found no support for (b) that males generally show higher levels of variability than females, or (c) that sexual dichromatism per se is associated with increased variability. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We show that it is currently possible to realistically estimate variability of animal colours as perceived by them, something difficult to achieve with other traits. Increased variability of known sexually-selected/quality-indicating colours in the studied species, provides support to the predictions borne from sexual selection theory but the lack of increased overall variability in males or dimorphic colours in general indicates that sexual differences might not always be shaped by similar selective forces. Public Library of Science 2008-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2253496/ /pubmed/18301766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001689 Text en Delhey, Peters. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Delhey, Kaspar
Peters, Anne
Quantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable?
title Quantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable?
title_full Quantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable?
title_fullStr Quantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable?
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable?
title_short Quantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable?
title_sort quantifying variability of avian colours: are signalling traits more variable?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18301766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001689
work_keys_str_mv AT delheykaspar quantifyingvariabilityofaviancoloursaresignallingtraitsmorevariable
AT petersanne quantifyingvariabilityofaviancoloursaresignallingtraitsmorevariable