Cargando…

Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the Dynamic Compression Screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures

BACKGROUND: The dynamic compression screw is a plate and screws implant used to treat fractures of the distal femur. The Biomet Matthews Nail is a new retrograde intramedullary nail designed as an alternative surgical option to treat these fractures. The objective of this study was to assess the com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Connor-Read, Laurence M, Davidson, Jerome A, Davies, Benjamin M, Matthews, Michael G, Smirthwaite, Paul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18208608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-7-3
_version_ 1782151117413548032
author O'Connor-Read, Laurence M
Davidson, Jerome A
Davies, Benjamin M
Matthews, Michael G
Smirthwaite, Paul
author_facet O'Connor-Read, Laurence M
Davidson, Jerome A
Davies, Benjamin M
Matthews, Michael G
Smirthwaite, Paul
author_sort O'Connor-Read, Laurence M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The dynamic compression screw is a plate and screws implant used to treat fractures of the distal femur. The Biomet Matthews Nail is a new retrograde intramedullary nail designed as an alternative surgical option to treat these fractures. The objective of this study was to assess the comparative endurance of both devices. METHOD: The dynamic compression screw (DCS) and Biomet Matthews Nail (BMN) were implanted into composite femurs, which were subsequently cyclically loaded using a materials testing machine. Simulated fractures were applied to each femur prior to the application of load. Either a Y type fracture or a transverse osteotomy was prepared on each composite femur using a jig to enable consistent positioning of cuts. RESULTS: The Biomet Matthews Nail demonstrated a greater endurance limit load over the dynamic compression screw in both fracture configurations. CONCLUSION: The distal locking screws pass through the Biomet Matthews Nail in a unique "cruciate" orientation. This allows for greater purchase in the bone of the femoral condyle and potentially improves the stability of the fracture fixation. As these fractures are usually in weak osteoporotic bone, the Biomet Matthews Nail represents a favourable surgical option in these patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2253542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22535422008-02-23 Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the Dynamic Compression Screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures O'Connor-Read, Laurence M Davidson, Jerome A Davies, Benjamin M Matthews, Michael G Smirthwaite, Paul Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: The dynamic compression screw is a plate and screws implant used to treat fractures of the distal femur. The Biomet Matthews Nail is a new retrograde intramedullary nail designed as an alternative surgical option to treat these fractures. The objective of this study was to assess the comparative endurance of both devices. METHOD: The dynamic compression screw (DCS) and Biomet Matthews Nail (BMN) were implanted into composite femurs, which were subsequently cyclically loaded using a materials testing machine. Simulated fractures were applied to each femur prior to the application of load. Either a Y type fracture or a transverse osteotomy was prepared on each composite femur using a jig to enable consistent positioning of cuts. RESULTS: The Biomet Matthews Nail demonstrated a greater endurance limit load over the dynamic compression screw in both fracture configurations. CONCLUSION: The distal locking screws pass through the Biomet Matthews Nail in a unique "cruciate" orientation. This allows for greater purchase in the bone of the femoral condyle and potentially improves the stability of the fracture fixation. As these fractures are usually in weak osteoporotic bone, the Biomet Matthews Nail represents a favourable surgical option in these patients. BioMed Central 2008-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2253542/ /pubmed/18208608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-7-3 Text en Copyright © 2008 O'Connor-Read et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
O'Connor-Read, Laurence M
Davidson, Jerome A
Davies, Benjamin M
Matthews, Michael G
Smirthwaite, Paul
Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the Dynamic Compression Screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures
title Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the Dynamic Compression Screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures
title_full Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the Dynamic Compression Screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures
title_fullStr Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the Dynamic Compression Screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the Dynamic Compression Screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures
title_short Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the Dynamic Compression Screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures
title_sort comparative endurance testing of the biomet matthews nail and the dynamic compression screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18208608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-7-3
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorreadlaurencem comparativeendurancetestingofthebiometmatthewsnailandthedynamiccompressionscrewinsimulatedcondylarandsupracondylarfemoralfractures
AT davidsonjeromea comparativeendurancetestingofthebiometmatthewsnailandthedynamiccompressionscrewinsimulatedcondylarandsupracondylarfemoralfractures
AT daviesbenjaminm comparativeendurancetestingofthebiometmatthewsnailandthedynamiccompressionscrewinsimulatedcondylarandsupracondylarfemoralfractures
AT matthewsmichaelg comparativeendurancetestingofthebiometmatthewsnailandthedynamiccompressionscrewinsimulatedcondylarandsupracondylarfemoralfractures
AT smirthwaitepaul comparativeendurancetestingofthebiometmatthewsnailandthedynamiccompressionscrewinsimulatedcondylarandsupracondylarfemoralfractures