Cargando…

Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice*

AIMS: To test the efficacy of (i) computer-generated tailored letters and (ii) practitioner-delivered brief advice for smoking cessation against an assessment-only condition; and to compare both interventions directly. DESIGN: Quasi-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A total of 34 randomly select...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Christian, Ulbricht, Sabina, Baumeister, Sebastian E, Schumann, Anja, Rüge, Jeannette, Bischof, Gallus, Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen, John, Ulrich
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17995993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02031.x
_version_ 1782151131499069440
author Meyer, Christian
Ulbricht, Sabina
Baumeister, Sebastian E
Schumann, Anja
Rüge, Jeannette
Bischof, Gallus
Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen
John, Ulrich
author_facet Meyer, Christian
Ulbricht, Sabina
Baumeister, Sebastian E
Schumann, Anja
Rüge, Jeannette
Bischof, Gallus
Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen
John, Ulrich
author_sort Meyer, Christian
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To test the efficacy of (i) computer-generated tailored letters and (ii) practitioner-delivered brief advice for smoking cessation against an assessment-only condition; and to compare both interventions directly. DESIGN: Quasi-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A total of 34 randomly selected general practices from a German region (participation rate 87%). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1499 consecutive patients aged 18–70 years with daily cigarette smoking (participation rate 80%). INTERVENTIONS: The tailored letters intervention group received up to three individualized personal letters. Brief advice was delivered during routine consultation by the practitioner after an onsite training session. Both interventions were based on the Transtheoretical Model of behaviour change. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported point prevalence and prolonged abstinence at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month follow-ups. FINDINGS: Among participants completing the last follow-up, 6-month prolonged abstinence was 18.3% in the tailored letters intervention group, 14.8% in the brief advice intervention group and 10.5% in the assessment-only control group. Assuming those lost to follow-up to be smokers, the rates were 10.2%, 9.7% and 6.7%, respectively. Analyses including all follow-ups confirmed statistically significant effects of both interventions compared to assessment only. Using complete case analysis, the tailored letters intervention was significantly more effective than brief advice for 24-hour [odds ratio (OR) = 1.4; P = 0.047] but not for 7-day point prevalence abstinence (OR = 1.4; P = 0.068) for prolonged abstinence, or for alternative assumptions about participants lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated long-term efficacy of low-cost interventions for smoking cessation in general practice. The interventions are suitable to reach entire populations of general practices and smoking patients. Computer-generated letters are a promising option to overcome barriers to provide smoking cessation counselling routinely.
format Text
id pubmed-2253708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22537082008-03-17 Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice* Meyer, Christian Ulbricht, Sabina Baumeister, Sebastian E Schumann, Anja Rüge, Jeannette Bischof, Gallus Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen John, Ulrich Addiction Research Reports AIMS: To test the efficacy of (i) computer-generated tailored letters and (ii) practitioner-delivered brief advice for smoking cessation against an assessment-only condition; and to compare both interventions directly. DESIGN: Quasi-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A total of 34 randomly selected general practices from a German region (participation rate 87%). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1499 consecutive patients aged 18–70 years with daily cigarette smoking (participation rate 80%). INTERVENTIONS: The tailored letters intervention group received up to three individualized personal letters. Brief advice was delivered during routine consultation by the practitioner after an onsite training session. Both interventions were based on the Transtheoretical Model of behaviour change. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported point prevalence and prolonged abstinence at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month follow-ups. FINDINGS: Among participants completing the last follow-up, 6-month prolonged abstinence was 18.3% in the tailored letters intervention group, 14.8% in the brief advice intervention group and 10.5% in the assessment-only control group. Assuming those lost to follow-up to be smokers, the rates were 10.2%, 9.7% and 6.7%, respectively. Analyses including all follow-ups confirmed statistically significant effects of both interventions compared to assessment only. Using complete case analysis, the tailored letters intervention was significantly more effective than brief advice for 24-hour [odds ratio (OR) = 1.4; P = 0.047] but not for 7-day point prevalence abstinence (OR = 1.4; P = 0.068) for prolonged abstinence, or for alternative assumptions about participants lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated long-term efficacy of low-cost interventions for smoking cessation in general practice. The interventions are suitable to reach entire populations of general practices and smoking patients. Computer-generated letters are a promising option to overcome barriers to provide smoking cessation counselling routinely. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2253708/ /pubmed/17995993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02031.x Text en © 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 Society for the Study of Addiction https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Meyer, Christian
Ulbricht, Sabina
Baumeister, Sebastian E
Schumann, Anja
Rüge, Jeannette
Bischof, Gallus
Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen
John, Ulrich
Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice*
title Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice*
title_full Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice*
title_fullStr Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice*
title_full_unstemmed Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice*
title_short Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice*
title_sort proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice*
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17995993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02031.x
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerchristian proactiveinterventionsforsmokingcessationingeneralmedicalpracticeaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheefficacyofcomputertailoredlettersandphysiciandeliveredbriefadvice
AT ulbrichtsabina proactiveinterventionsforsmokingcessationingeneralmedicalpracticeaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheefficacyofcomputertailoredlettersandphysiciandeliveredbriefadvice
AT baumeistersebastiane proactiveinterventionsforsmokingcessationingeneralmedicalpracticeaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheefficacyofcomputertailoredlettersandphysiciandeliveredbriefadvice
AT schumannanja proactiveinterventionsforsmokingcessationingeneralmedicalpracticeaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheefficacyofcomputertailoredlettersandphysiciandeliveredbriefadvice
AT rugejeannette proactiveinterventionsforsmokingcessationingeneralmedicalpracticeaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheefficacyofcomputertailoredlettersandphysiciandeliveredbriefadvice
AT bischofgallus proactiveinterventionsforsmokingcessationingeneralmedicalpracticeaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheefficacyofcomputertailoredlettersandphysiciandeliveredbriefadvice
AT rumpfhansjurgen proactiveinterventionsforsmokingcessationingeneralmedicalpracticeaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheefficacyofcomputertailoredlettersandphysiciandeliveredbriefadvice
AT johnulrich proactiveinterventionsforsmokingcessationingeneralmedicalpracticeaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrialtoexaminetheefficacyofcomputertailoredlettersandphysiciandeliveredbriefadvice