Cargando…
Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device
OBJECTIVES: To describe a new surgical procedure for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device (VSD) and to report the results of surgery. DESIGN: A prospective observational study SETTING: Two tertiary referral Urogynaecology practices. POPULATION: Ninety-five women with Interna...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18190377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01606.x |
_version_ | 1782151132423913472 |
---|---|
author | Carey, M Slack, M Higgs, P Wynn-Williams, M Cornish, A |
author_facet | Carey, M Slack, M Higgs, P Wynn-Williams, M Cornish, A |
author_sort | Carey, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To describe a new surgical procedure for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device (VSD) and to report the results of surgery. DESIGN: A prospective observational study SETTING: Two tertiary referral Urogynaecology practices. POPULATION: Ninety-five women with International Continence Society pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage 2 or more pelvic organ prolapse who underwent vaginal surgery using mesh augmentation and a VSD. METHODS: Surgery involved a vaginal approach with mesh reinforcement and placement of a VSD for 4 weeks. At 6 and 12 months, women were examined for prolapse recurrence, and visual analogue scales for satisfaction were completed. Women completed quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective success of surgery at 6 and 12 months following surgery. Secondary outcomes were subjective success, complications, QOL outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. RESULTS: Objective success rate was 92 and 85% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Subjective success rate was 91 and 87% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. New prolapse in nonrepaired compartments accounted for 7 of 12 (58%) failures at 12 months. Two of 4 mesh exposures required surgery. Sexual dysfunction was reported by 58% of sexually active women preoperatively and 23% at 12 months. QOL scores significantly improved at 12 months compared with baseline (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Vaginal surgery using mesh and a VSD is an effective procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. However, further studies are required to establish the role of the surgery described in this study. Please cite this paper as:Carey M, Slack M, Higgs P, Wynn-Williams M, Cornish A. Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device. BJOG 2008;115:391–397. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2253712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22537122008-03-10 Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device Carey, M Slack, M Higgs, P Wynn-Williams, M Cornish, A BJOG Genitourinary Medicine OBJECTIVES: To describe a new surgical procedure for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device (VSD) and to report the results of surgery. DESIGN: A prospective observational study SETTING: Two tertiary referral Urogynaecology practices. POPULATION: Ninety-five women with International Continence Society pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage 2 or more pelvic organ prolapse who underwent vaginal surgery using mesh augmentation and a VSD. METHODS: Surgery involved a vaginal approach with mesh reinforcement and placement of a VSD for 4 weeks. At 6 and 12 months, women were examined for prolapse recurrence, and visual analogue scales for satisfaction were completed. Women completed quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective success of surgery at 6 and 12 months following surgery. Secondary outcomes were subjective success, complications, QOL outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. RESULTS: Objective success rate was 92 and 85% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Subjective success rate was 91 and 87% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. New prolapse in nonrepaired compartments accounted for 7 of 12 (58%) failures at 12 months. Two of 4 mesh exposures required surgery. Sexual dysfunction was reported by 58% of sexually active women preoperatively and 23% at 12 months. QOL scores significantly improved at 12 months compared with baseline (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Vaginal surgery using mesh and a VSD is an effective procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. However, further studies are required to establish the role of the surgery described in this study. Please cite this paper as:Carey M, Slack M, Higgs P, Wynn-Williams M, Cornish A. Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device. BJOG 2008;115:391–397. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2253712/ /pubmed/18190377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01606.x Text en © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Genitourinary Medicine Carey, M Slack, M Higgs, P Wynn-Williams, M Cornish, A Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device |
title | Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device |
title_full | Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device |
title_fullStr | Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device |
title_full_unstemmed | Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device |
title_short | Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device |
title_sort | vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device |
topic | Genitourinary Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18190377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01606.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT careym vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice AT slackm vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice AT higgsp vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice AT wynnwilliamsm vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice AT cornisha vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice |