Cargando…

Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device

OBJECTIVES: To describe a new surgical procedure for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device (VSD) and to report the results of surgery. DESIGN: A prospective observational study SETTING: Two tertiary referral Urogynaecology practices. POPULATION: Ninety-five women with Interna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carey, M, Slack, M, Higgs, P, Wynn-Williams, M, Cornish, A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18190377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01606.x
_version_ 1782151132423913472
author Carey, M
Slack, M
Higgs, P
Wynn-Williams, M
Cornish, A
author_facet Carey, M
Slack, M
Higgs, P
Wynn-Williams, M
Cornish, A
author_sort Carey, M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To describe a new surgical procedure for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device (VSD) and to report the results of surgery. DESIGN: A prospective observational study SETTING: Two tertiary referral Urogynaecology practices. POPULATION: Ninety-five women with International Continence Society pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage 2 or more pelvic organ prolapse who underwent vaginal surgery using mesh augmentation and a VSD. METHODS: Surgery involved a vaginal approach with mesh reinforcement and placement of a VSD for 4 weeks. At 6 and 12 months, women were examined for prolapse recurrence, and visual analogue scales for satisfaction were completed. Women completed quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective success of surgery at 6 and 12 months following surgery. Secondary outcomes were subjective success, complications, QOL outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. RESULTS: Objective success rate was 92 and 85% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Subjective success rate was 91 and 87% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. New prolapse in nonrepaired compartments accounted for 7 of 12 (58%) failures at 12 months. Two of 4 mesh exposures required surgery. Sexual dysfunction was reported by 58% of sexually active women preoperatively and 23% at 12 months. QOL scores significantly improved at 12 months compared with baseline (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Vaginal surgery using mesh and a VSD is an effective procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. However, further studies are required to establish the role of the surgery described in this study. Please cite this paper as:Carey M, Slack M, Higgs P, Wynn-Williams M, Cornish A. Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device. BJOG 2008;115:391–397.
format Text
id pubmed-2253712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22537122008-03-10 Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device Carey, M Slack, M Higgs, P Wynn-Williams, M Cornish, A BJOG Genitourinary Medicine OBJECTIVES: To describe a new surgical procedure for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device (VSD) and to report the results of surgery. DESIGN: A prospective observational study SETTING: Two tertiary referral Urogynaecology practices. POPULATION: Ninety-five women with International Continence Society pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage 2 or more pelvic organ prolapse who underwent vaginal surgery using mesh augmentation and a VSD. METHODS: Surgery involved a vaginal approach with mesh reinforcement and placement of a VSD for 4 weeks. At 6 and 12 months, women were examined for prolapse recurrence, and visual analogue scales for satisfaction were completed. Women completed quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective success of surgery at 6 and 12 months following surgery. Secondary outcomes were subjective success, complications, QOL outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. RESULTS: Objective success rate was 92 and 85% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Subjective success rate was 91 and 87% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. New prolapse in nonrepaired compartments accounted for 7 of 12 (58%) failures at 12 months. Two of 4 mesh exposures required surgery. Sexual dysfunction was reported by 58% of sexually active women preoperatively and 23% at 12 months. QOL scores significantly improved at 12 months compared with baseline (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Vaginal surgery using mesh and a VSD is an effective procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. However, further studies are required to establish the role of the surgery described in this study. Please cite this paper as:Carey M, Slack M, Higgs P, Wynn-Williams M, Cornish A. Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device. BJOG 2008;115:391–397. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2253712/ /pubmed/18190377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01606.x Text en © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Genitourinary Medicine
Carey, M
Slack, M
Higgs, P
Wynn-Williams, M
Cornish, A
Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device
title Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device
title_full Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device
title_fullStr Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device
title_full_unstemmed Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device
title_short Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device
title_sort vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device
topic Genitourinary Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2253712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18190377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01606.x
work_keys_str_mv AT careym vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice
AT slackm vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice
AT higgsp vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice
AT wynnwilliamsm vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice
AT cornisha vaginalsurgeryforpelvicorganprolapseusingmeshandavaginalsupportdevice