Cargando…

The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?

BACKGROUND: It is well established that nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NbM) lesions impair performance on tests of sustained attention. Previous work from this laboratory has also demonstrated that pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesioned rats make more omissions on a test of sustained a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rostron, Claire L, Farquhar, Morag J, Latimer, Mary P, Winn, Philip
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2257968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18234074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16
_version_ 1782151295925223424
author Rostron, Claire L
Farquhar, Morag J
Latimer, Mary P
Winn, Philip
author_facet Rostron, Claire L
Farquhar, Morag J
Latimer, Mary P
Winn, Philip
author_sort Rostron, Claire L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is well established that nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NbM) lesions impair performance on tests of sustained attention. Previous work from this laboratory has also demonstrated that pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesioned rats make more omissions on a test of sustained attention, suggesting that it might also play a role in mediating this function. However, the results of the PPTg study were open to alternative interpretation. We aimed to resolve this by conducting a detailed analysis of the effects of damage to each brain region in the same sustained attention task used in our previous work. Rats were trained in the task before surgery and post-surgical testing examined performance in response to unpredictable light signals of 1500 ms and 4000 ms duration. Data for PPTg lesioned rats were compared to control rats, and rats with 192 IgG saporin infusions centred on the NbM. In addition to operant data, video data of rats' performance during the task were also analysed. RESULTS: Both lesion groups omitted trials relative to controls but the effect was milder and transient in NbM rats. The number of omitted trials decreased in all groups when tested using the 4000 ms signal compared to the 1500 ms signal. This confirmed previous findings for PPTg lesioned rats. Detailed analysis revealed that the increase in omissions in PPTg rats was not a consequence of motor impairment. The video data (taken on selected days) showed reduced lever orientation in PPTg lesioned rats, coupled with an increase in unconditioned behaviours such as rearing and sniffing. In contrast NbM rats showed evidence of inadequate lever pressing. CONCLUSION: The question addressed here is whether the PPTg and NbM both have a role in sustained attention. Rats bearing lesions of either structure showed deficits in the test used. However, we conclude that the most parsimonious explanation for the deficit observed in PPTg rats is inadequate response organization, rather than impairment in sustained attention. Furthermore the impairment observed in NbM lesioned rats included lever pressing difficulties in addition to impaired sustained attention. Unfortunately we could not link these deficits directly to cholinergic neuronal loss.
format Text
id pubmed-2257968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22579682008-02-28 The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention? Rostron, Claire L Farquhar, Morag J Latimer, Mary P Winn, Philip BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: It is well established that nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NbM) lesions impair performance on tests of sustained attention. Previous work from this laboratory has also demonstrated that pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesioned rats make more omissions on a test of sustained attention, suggesting that it might also play a role in mediating this function. However, the results of the PPTg study were open to alternative interpretation. We aimed to resolve this by conducting a detailed analysis of the effects of damage to each brain region in the same sustained attention task used in our previous work. Rats were trained in the task before surgery and post-surgical testing examined performance in response to unpredictable light signals of 1500 ms and 4000 ms duration. Data for PPTg lesioned rats were compared to control rats, and rats with 192 IgG saporin infusions centred on the NbM. In addition to operant data, video data of rats' performance during the task were also analysed. RESULTS: Both lesion groups omitted trials relative to controls but the effect was milder and transient in NbM rats. The number of omitted trials decreased in all groups when tested using the 4000 ms signal compared to the 1500 ms signal. This confirmed previous findings for PPTg lesioned rats. Detailed analysis revealed that the increase in omissions in PPTg rats was not a consequence of motor impairment. The video data (taken on selected days) showed reduced lever orientation in PPTg lesioned rats, coupled with an increase in unconditioned behaviours such as rearing and sniffing. In contrast NbM rats showed evidence of inadequate lever pressing. CONCLUSION: The question addressed here is whether the PPTg and NbM both have a role in sustained attention. Rats bearing lesions of either structure showed deficits in the test used. However, we conclude that the most parsimonious explanation for the deficit observed in PPTg rats is inadequate response organization, rather than impairment in sustained attention. Furthermore the impairment observed in NbM lesioned rats included lever pressing difficulties in addition to impaired sustained attention. Unfortunately we could not link these deficits directly to cholinergic neuronal loss. BioMed Central 2008-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2257968/ /pubmed/18234074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16 Text en Copyright © 2008 Rostron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rostron, Claire L
Farquhar, Morag J
Latimer, Mary P
Winn, Philip
The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?
title The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?
title_full The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?
title_fullStr The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?
title_full_unstemmed The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?
title_short The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?
title_sort pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: do both have a role in sustained attention?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2257968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18234074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16
work_keys_str_mv AT rostronclairel thepedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention
AT farquharmoragj thepedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention
AT latimermaryp thepedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention
AT winnphilip thepedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention
AT rostronclairel pedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention
AT farquharmoragj pedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention
AT latimermaryp pedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention
AT winnphilip pedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention