Cargando…
The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?
BACKGROUND: It is well established that nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NbM) lesions impair performance on tests of sustained attention. Previous work from this laboratory has also demonstrated that pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesioned rats make more omissions on a test of sustained a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2257968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18234074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16 |
_version_ | 1782151295925223424 |
---|---|
author | Rostron, Claire L Farquhar, Morag J Latimer, Mary P Winn, Philip |
author_facet | Rostron, Claire L Farquhar, Morag J Latimer, Mary P Winn, Philip |
author_sort | Rostron, Claire L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is well established that nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NbM) lesions impair performance on tests of sustained attention. Previous work from this laboratory has also demonstrated that pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesioned rats make more omissions on a test of sustained attention, suggesting that it might also play a role in mediating this function. However, the results of the PPTg study were open to alternative interpretation. We aimed to resolve this by conducting a detailed analysis of the effects of damage to each brain region in the same sustained attention task used in our previous work. Rats were trained in the task before surgery and post-surgical testing examined performance in response to unpredictable light signals of 1500 ms and 4000 ms duration. Data for PPTg lesioned rats were compared to control rats, and rats with 192 IgG saporin infusions centred on the NbM. In addition to operant data, video data of rats' performance during the task were also analysed. RESULTS: Both lesion groups omitted trials relative to controls but the effect was milder and transient in NbM rats. The number of omitted trials decreased in all groups when tested using the 4000 ms signal compared to the 1500 ms signal. This confirmed previous findings for PPTg lesioned rats. Detailed analysis revealed that the increase in omissions in PPTg rats was not a consequence of motor impairment. The video data (taken on selected days) showed reduced lever orientation in PPTg lesioned rats, coupled with an increase in unconditioned behaviours such as rearing and sniffing. In contrast NbM rats showed evidence of inadequate lever pressing. CONCLUSION: The question addressed here is whether the PPTg and NbM both have a role in sustained attention. Rats bearing lesions of either structure showed deficits in the test used. However, we conclude that the most parsimonious explanation for the deficit observed in PPTg rats is inadequate response organization, rather than impairment in sustained attention. Furthermore the impairment observed in NbM lesioned rats included lever pressing difficulties in addition to impaired sustained attention. Unfortunately we could not link these deficits directly to cholinergic neuronal loss. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2257968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22579682008-02-28 The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention? Rostron, Claire L Farquhar, Morag J Latimer, Mary P Winn, Philip BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: It is well established that nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NbM) lesions impair performance on tests of sustained attention. Previous work from this laboratory has also demonstrated that pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesioned rats make more omissions on a test of sustained attention, suggesting that it might also play a role in mediating this function. However, the results of the PPTg study were open to alternative interpretation. We aimed to resolve this by conducting a detailed analysis of the effects of damage to each brain region in the same sustained attention task used in our previous work. Rats were trained in the task before surgery and post-surgical testing examined performance in response to unpredictable light signals of 1500 ms and 4000 ms duration. Data for PPTg lesioned rats were compared to control rats, and rats with 192 IgG saporin infusions centred on the NbM. In addition to operant data, video data of rats' performance during the task were also analysed. RESULTS: Both lesion groups omitted trials relative to controls but the effect was milder and transient in NbM rats. The number of omitted trials decreased in all groups when tested using the 4000 ms signal compared to the 1500 ms signal. This confirmed previous findings for PPTg lesioned rats. Detailed analysis revealed that the increase in omissions in PPTg rats was not a consequence of motor impairment. The video data (taken on selected days) showed reduced lever orientation in PPTg lesioned rats, coupled with an increase in unconditioned behaviours such as rearing and sniffing. In contrast NbM rats showed evidence of inadequate lever pressing. CONCLUSION: The question addressed here is whether the PPTg and NbM both have a role in sustained attention. Rats bearing lesions of either structure showed deficits in the test used. However, we conclude that the most parsimonious explanation for the deficit observed in PPTg rats is inadequate response organization, rather than impairment in sustained attention. Furthermore the impairment observed in NbM lesioned rats included lever pressing difficulties in addition to impaired sustained attention. Unfortunately we could not link these deficits directly to cholinergic neuronal loss. BioMed Central 2008-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2257968/ /pubmed/18234074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16 Text en Copyright © 2008 Rostron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rostron, Claire L Farquhar, Morag J Latimer, Mary P Winn, Philip The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention? |
title | The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention? |
title_full | The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention? |
title_fullStr | The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention? |
title_full_unstemmed | The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention? |
title_short | The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention? |
title_sort | pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: do both have a role in sustained attention? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2257968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18234074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rostronclairel thepedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention AT farquharmoragj thepedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention AT latimermaryp thepedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention AT winnphilip thepedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention AT rostronclairel pedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention AT farquharmoragj pedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention AT latimermaryp pedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention AT winnphilip pedunculopontinetegmentalnucleusandthenucleusbasalismagnocellularisdobothhavearoleinsustainedattention |