Cargando…

The Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in surgery

BACKGROUND: Two unfortunate outcomes for patients treated surgically for rectal cancer are placement of a permanent colostomy and local tumor recurrence. Total mesorectal excision is a new technique for rectal cancer surgery that can lead to improved patient outcomes. We describe a cluster randomize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simunovic, Marko, Goldsmith, Charles, Thabane, Lehana, McLeod, Robin, DeNardi, Franco, Whelan, Timothy J, Levine, Mark N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2262058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18279521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-4
_version_ 1782151398559842304
author Simunovic, Marko
Goldsmith, Charles
Thabane, Lehana
McLeod, Robin
DeNardi, Franco
Whelan, Timothy J
Levine, Mark N
author_facet Simunovic, Marko
Goldsmith, Charles
Thabane, Lehana
McLeod, Robin
DeNardi, Franco
Whelan, Timothy J
Levine, Mark N
author_sort Simunovic, Marko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two unfortunate outcomes for patients treated surgically for rectal cancer are placement of a permanent colostomy and local tumor recurrence. Total mesorectal excision is a new technique for rectal cancer surgery that can lead to improved patient outcomes. We describe a cluster randomized controlled trial that is testing if the above patient outcomes can be improved through a knowledge translation strategy called the Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) strategy. The strategy is designed to optimize the use of total mesorectal excision techniques. METHODS AND DESIGN: Hospitals were randomized to the QIRC strategy (experimental group) versus normal practice environment (control group). Participating hospitals, and the respective surgeon group operating in them, are from Ontario, Canada and have an annual procedure volume for major rectal cancer resections of 15 or greater. Patients were eligible if they underwent major rectal surgery for a diagnosis of primary rectal cancer. The surgeon-directed QIRC interventions included a workshop, use of opinion leaders, operative demonstrations, a post-operative questionnaire, and, audit and feedback. For an operative demonstration participating surgeons invited a study team surgeon to assist them with a case of rectal cancer surgery. The intent was to demonstrate total mesorectal excision techniques. Control arm surgeons received no intervention. Sample size calculations were two-sided, considered the clustering of data at the hospital level, and were driven by requirements for the outcome local recurrence. To detect an improvement in local recurrence from 20% to 8% with confidence we required 16 hospitals and 672 patients – 8 hospitals and 336 patients in each arm. Outcomes data are collected via chart review for at least 30 months after surgery. Analyses will use an intention-to-treat principle and will consider the clustering of data. Data collection will be complete by the end of 2007. DISCUSSION: Lower rates of permanent colostomy and local tumour recurrence in the intervention arm would suggest the QIRC strategy is efficacious. The strategy may act as a template for efforts to improve surgical quality in other areas and will contribute to knowledge on influencing surgeon practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN78363167
format Text
id pubmed-2262058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22620582008-03-04 The Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in surgery Simunovic, Marko Goldsmith, Charles Thabane, Lehana McLeod, Robin DeNardi, Franco Whelan, Timothy J Levine, Mark N BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Two unfortunate outcomes for patients treated surgically for rectal cancer are placement of a permanent colostomy and local tumor recurrence. Total mesorectal excision is a new technique for rectal cancer surgery that can lead to improved patient outcomes. We describe a cluster randomized controlled trial that is testing if the above patient outcomes can be improved through a knowledge translation strategy called the Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) strategy. The strategy is designed to optimize the use of total mesorectal excision techniques. METHODS AND DESIGN: Hospitals were randomized to the QIRC strategy (experimental group) versus normal practice environment (control group). Participating hospitals, and the respective surgeon group operating in them, are from Ontario, Canada and have an annual procedure volume for major rectal cancer resections of 15 or greater. Patients were eligible if they underwent major rectal surgery for a diagnosis of primary rectal cancer. The surgeon-directed QIRC interventions included a workshop, use of opinion leaders, operative demonstrations, a post-operative questionnaire, and, audit and feedback. For an operative demonstration participating surgeons invited a study team surgeon to assist them with a case of rectal cancer surgery. The intent was to demonstrate total mesorectal excision techniques. Control arm surgeons received no intervention. Sample size calculations were two-sided, considered the clustering of data at the hospital level, and were driven by requirements for the outcome local recurrence. To detect an improvement in local recurrence from 20% to 8% with confidence we required 16 hospitals and 672 patients – 8 hospitals and 336 patients in each arm. Outcomes data are collected via chart review for at least 30 months after surgery. Analyses will use an intention-to-treat principle and will consider the clustering of data. Data collection will be complete by the end of 2007. DISCUSSION: Lower rates of permanent colostomy and local tumour recurrence in the intervention arm would suggest the QIRC strategy is efficacious. The strategy may act as a template for efforts to improve surgical quality in other areas and will contribute to knowledge on influencing surgeon practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN78363167 BioMed Central 2008-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2262058/ /pubmed/18279521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-4 Text en Copyright © 2008 Simunovic et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Simunovic, Marko
Goldsmith, Charles
Thabane, Lehana
McLeod, Robin
DeNardi, Franco
Whelan, Timothy J
Levine, Mark N
The Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in surgery
title The Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in surgery
title_full The Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in surgery
title_fullStr The Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in surgery
title_full_unstemmed The Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in surgery
title_short The Quality Initiative in Rectal Cancer (QIRC) trial: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in surgery
title_sort quality initiative in rectal cancer (qirc) trial: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in surgery
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2262058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18279521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-4
work_keys_str_mv AT simunovicmarko thequalityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT goldsmithcharles thequalityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT thabanelehana thequalityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT mcleodrobin thequalityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT denardifranco thequalityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT whelantimothyj thequalityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT levinemarkn thequalityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT simunovicmarko qualityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT goldsmithcharles qualityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT thabanelehana qualityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT mcleodrobin qualityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT denardifranco qualityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT whelantimothyj qualityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery
AT levinemarkn qualityinitiativeinrectalcancerqirctrialstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsurgery