Cargando…
Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system
BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays provide a powerful method for global analysis of gene expression. The application of this technology to specific cell types and tissues, however, is typically limited by small amounts of available mRNA, thereby necessitating amplification. Here we compare microarray resul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2263045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18284693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-84 |
_version_ | 1782151435296702464 |
---|---|
author | Watson, Joseph D Wang, Shenglong Von Stetina, Stephen E Spencer, W Clay Levy, Shawn Dexheimer, Phillip J Kurn, Nurith Heath, Joe Don Miller, David M |
author_facet | Watson, Joseph D Wang, Shenglong Von Stetina, Stephen E Spencer, W Clay Levy, Shawn Dexheimer, Phillip J Kurn, Nurith Heath, Joe Don Miller, David M |
author_sort | Watson, Joseph D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays provide a powerful method for global analysis of gene expression. The application of this technology to specific cell types and tissues, however, is typically limited by small amounts of available mRNA, thereby necessitating amplification. Here we compare microarray results obtained with two different methods of RNA amplification to profile gene expression in the C. elegans larval nervous system. RESULTS: We used the mRNA-tagging strategy to isolate transcripts specifically from C. elegans larval neurons. The WT-Ovation Pico System (WT-Pico) was used to amplify 2 ng of pan-neural RNA to produce labeled cDNA for microarray analysis. These WT-Pico-derived data were compared to microarray results obtained with a labeled aRNA target generated by two rounds of In Vitro Transcription (IVT) of 25 ng of pan-neural RNA. WT-Pico results in a higher fraction of present calls than IVT, a finding consistent with the proposal that DNA-DNA hybridization results in lower mismatch signals than the RNA-DNA heteroduplexes produced by IVT amplification. Microarray data sets from these samples were compared to a reference profile of all larval cells to identify transcripts with elevated expression in neurons. These results were validated by the high proportion of known neuron-expressed genes detected in these profiles and by promoter-GFP constructs for previously uncharacterized genes in these data sets. Together, the IVT and WT-Pico methods identified 2,173 unique neuron-enriched transcripts. Only about half of these transcripts (1,044), however, are detected as enriched by both IVT and WT-Pico amplification. CONCLUSION: We show that two different methods of RNA amplification, IVT and WT-Pico, produce valid microarray profiles of gene expression in the C. elegans larval nervous system with a low rate of false positives. However, our results also show that each method of RNA amplification detects a unique subset of bona fide neural-enriched transcripts and thus a wider array of authentic neural genes are identified by the combination of these data sets than by the microarray profiles obtained with either method of RNA amplification alone. With its relative ease of implementation and greater sensitivity, WT-Pico is the preferred method of amplification for cases in which sample RNA is limiting. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2263045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22630452008-03-06 Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system Watson, Joseph D Wang, Shenglong Von Stetina, Stephen E Spencer, W Clay Levy, Shawn Dexheimer, Phillip J Kurn, Nurith Heath, Joe Don Miller, David M BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays provide a powerful method for global analysis of gene expression. The application of this technology to specific cell types and tissues, however, is typically limited by small amounts of available mRNA, thereby necessitating amplification. Here we compare microarray results obtained with two different methods of RNA amplification to profile gene expression in the C. elegans larval nervous system. RESULTS: We used the mRNA-tagging strategy to isolate transcripts specifically from C. elegans larval neurons. The WT-Ovation Pico System (WT-Pico) was used to amplify 2 ng of pan-neural RNA to produce labeled cDNA for microarray analysis. These WT-Pico-derived data were compared to microarray results obtained with a labeled aRNA target generated by two rounds of In Vitro Transcription (IVT) of 25 ng of pan-neural RNA. WT-Pico results in a higher fraction of present calls than IVT, a finding consistent with the proposal that DNA-DNA hybridization results in lower mismatch signals than the RNA-DNA heteroduplexes produced by IVT amplification. Microarray data sets from these samples were compared to a reference profile of all larval cells to identify transcripts with elevated expression in neurons. These results were validated by the high proportion of known neuron-expressed genes detected in these profiles and by promoter-GFP constructs for previously uncharacterized genes in these data sets. Together, the IVT and WT-Pico methods identified 2,173 unique neuron-enriched transcripts. Only about half of these transcripts (1,044), however, are detected as enriched by both IVT and WT-Pico amplification. CONCLUSION: We show that two different methods of RNA amplification, IVT and WT-Pico, produce valid microarray profiles of gene expression in the C. elegans larval nervous system with a low rate of false positives. However, our results also show that each method of RNA amplification detects a unique subset of bona fide neural-enriched transcripts and thus a wider array of authentic neural genes are identified by the combination of these data sets than by the microarray profiles obtained with either method of RNA amplification alone. With its relative ease of implementation and greater sensitivity, WT-Pico is the preferred method of amplification for cases in which sample RNA is limiting. BioMed Central 2008-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2263045/ /pubmed/18284693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-84 Text en Copyright © 2008 Watson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Watson, Joseph D Wang, Shenglong Von Stetina, Stephen E Spencer, W Clay Levy, Shawn Dexheimer, Phillip J Kurn, Nurith Heath, Joe Don Miller, David M Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system |
title | Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system |
title_full | Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system |
title_fullStr | Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system |
title_full_unstemmed | Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system |
title_short | Complementary RNA amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the C. elegans nervous system |
title_sort | complementary rna amplification methods enhance microarray identification of transcripts expressed in the c. elegans nervous system |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2263045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18284693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-84 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watsonjosephd complementaryrnaamplificationmethodsenhancemicroarrayidentificationoftranscriptsexpressedinthecelegansnervoussystem AT wangshenglong complementaryrnaamplificationmethodsenhancemicroarrayidentificationoftranscriptsexpressedinthecelegansnervoussystem AT vonstetinastephene complementaryrnaamplificationmethodsenhancemicroarrayidentificationoftranscriptsexpressedinthecelegansnervoussystem AT spencerwclay complementaryrnaamplificationmethodsenhancemicroarrayidentificationoftranscriptsexpressedinthecelegansnervoussystem AT levyshawn complementaryrnaamplificationmethodsenhancemicroarrayidentificationoftranscriptsexpressedinthecelegansnervoussystem AT dexheimerphillipj complementaryrnaamplificationmethodsenhancemicroarrayidentificationoftranscriptsexpressedinthecelegansnervoussystem AT kurnnurith complementaryrnaamplificationmethodsenhancemicroarrayidentificationoftranscriptsexpressedinthecelegansnervoussystem AT heathjoedon complementaryrnaamplificationmethodsenhancemicroarrayidentificationoftranscriptsexpressedinthecelegansnervoussystem AT millerdavidm complementaryrnaamplificationmethodsenhancemicroarrayidentificationoftranscriptsexpressedinthecelegansnervoussystem |