Cargando…
Compound Cytotoxicity Profiling Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening
BACKGROUND: The propensity of compounds to produce adverse health effects in humans is generally evaluated using animal-based test methods. Such methods can be relatively expensive, low-throughput, and associated with pain suffered by the treated animals. In addition, differences in species biology...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18335092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10727 |
_version_ | 1782151454889345024 |
---|---|
author | Xia, Menghang Huang, Ruili Witt, Kristine L. Southall, Noel Fostel, Jennifer Cho, Ming-Hsuang Jadhav, Ajit Smith, Cynthia S. Inglese, James Portier, Christopher J. Tice, Raymond R. Austin, Christopher P. |
author_facet | Xia, Menghang Huang, Ruili Witt, Kristine L. Southall, Noel Fostel, Jennifer Cho, Ming-Hsuang Jadhav, Ajit Smith, Cynthia S. Inglese, James Portier, Christopher J. Tice, Raymond R. Austin, Christopher P. |
author_sort | Xia, Menghang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The propensity of compounds to produce adverse health effects in humans is generally evaluated using animal-based test methods. Such methods can be relatively expensive, low-throughput, and associated with pain suffered by the treated animals. In addition, differences in species biology may confound extrapolation to human health effects. OBJECTIVE: The National Toxicology Program and the National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center are collaborating to identify a battery of cell-based screens to prioritize compounds for further toxicologic evaluation. METHODS: A collection of 1,408 compounds previously tested in one or more traditional toxicologic assays were profiled for cytotoxicity using quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) in 13 human and rodent cell types derived from six common targets of xenobiotic toxicity (liver, blood, kidney, nerve, lung, skin). Selected cytotoxicants were further tested to define response kinetics. RESULTS: qHTS of these compounds produced robust and reproducible results, which allowed cross-compound, cross-cell type, and cross-species comparisons. Some compounds were cytotoxic to all cell types at similar concentrations, whereas others exhibited species- or cell type–specific cytotoxicity. Closely related cell types and analogous cell types in human and rodent frequently showed different patterns of cytotoxicity. Some compounds inducing similar levels of cytotoxicity showed distinct time dependence in kinetic studies, consistent with known mechanisms of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The generation of high-quality cytotoxicity data on this large library of known compounds using qHTS demonstrates the potential of this methodology to profile a much broader array of assays and compounds, which, in aggregate, may be valuable for prioritizing compounds for further toxicologic evaluation, identifying compounds with particular mechanisms of action, and potentially predicting in vivo biological response. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2265061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22650612008-03-11 Compound Cytotoxicity Profiling Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening Xia, Menghang Huang, Ruili Witt, Kristine L. Southall, Noel Fostel, Jennifer Cho, Ming-Hsuang Jadhav, Ajit Smith, Cynthia S. Inglese, James Portier, Christopher J. Tice, Raymond R. Austin, Christopher P. Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: The propensity of compounds to produce adverse health effects in humans is generally evaluated using animal-based test methods. Such methods can be relatively expensive, low-throughput, and associated with pain suffered by the treated animals. In addition, differences in species biology may confound extrapolation to human health effects. OBJECTIVE: The National Toxicology Program and the National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center are collaborating to identify a battery of cell-based screens to prioritize compounds for further toxicologic evaluation. METHODS: A collection of 1,408 compounds previously tested in one or more traditional toxicologic assays were profiled for cytotoxicity using quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) in 13 human and rodent cell types derived from six common targets of xenobiotic toxicity (liver, blood, kidney, nerve, lung, skin). Selected cytotoxicants were further tested to define response kinetics. RESULTS: qHTS of these compounds produced robust and reproducible results, which allowed cross-compound, cross-cell type, and cross-species comparisons. Some compounds were cytotoxic to all cell types at similar concentrations, whereas others exhibited species- or cell type–specific cytotoxicity. Closely related cell types and analogous cell types in human and rodent frequently showed different patterns of cytotoxicity. Some compounds inducing similar levels of cytotoxicity showed distinct time dependence in kinetic studies, consistent with known mechanisms of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The generation of high-quality cytotoxicity data on this large library of known compounds using qHTS demonstrates the potential of this methodology to profile a much broader array of assays and compounds, which, in aggregate, may be valuable for prioritizing compounds for further toxicologic evaluation, identifying compounds with particular mechanisms of action, and potentially predicting in vivo biological response. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2008-03 2007-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2265061/ /pubmed/18335092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10727 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Research Xia, Menghang Huang, Ruili Witt, Kristine L. Southall, Noel Fostel, Jennifer Cho, Ming-Hsuang Jadhav, Ajit Smith, Cynthia S. Inglese, James Portier, Christopher J. Tice, Raymond R. Austin, Christopher P. Compound Cytotoxicity Profiling Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening |
title | Compound Cytotoxicity Profiling Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening |
title_full | Compound Cytotoxicity Profiling Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening |
title_fullStr | Compound Cytotoxicity Profiling Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Compound Cytotoxicity Profiling Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening |
title_short | Compound Cytotoxicity Profiling Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening |
title_sort | compound cytotoxicity profiling using quantitative high-throughput screening |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18335092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10727 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiamenghang compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT huangruili compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT wittkristinel compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT southallnoel compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT fosteljennifer compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT chominghsuang compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT jadhavajit compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT smithcynthias compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT inglesejames compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT portierchristopherj compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT ticeraymondr compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening AT austinchristopherp compoundcytotoxicityprofilingusingquantitativehighthroughputscreening |