Cargando…

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Display No Preference for Chaperone Binding In Vivo

Intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins (IDPs) are extremely sensitive to proteolysis in vitro, but show no enhanced degradation rates in vivo. Their existence and functioning may be explained if IDPs are preferentially associated with chaperones in the cell, which may offer protection agains...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegyi, Hedi, Tompa, Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18369417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000017
_version_ 1782151486312022016
author Hegyi, Hedi
Tompa, Peter
author_facet Hegyi, Hedi
Tompa, Peter
author_sort Hegyi, Hedi
collection PubMed
description Intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins (IDPs) are extremely sensitive to proteolysis in vitro, but show no enhanced degradation rates in vivo. Their existence and functioning may be explained if IDPs are preferentially associated with chaperones in the cell, which may offer protection against degradation by proteases. To test this inference, we took pairwise interaction data from high-throughput interaction studies and analyzed to see if predicted disorder correlates with the tendency of chaperone binding by proteins. Our major finding is that disorder predicted by the IUPred algorithm actually shows negative correlation with chaperone binding in E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and metazoa species. Since predicted disorder positively correlates with the tendency of partner binding in the interactome, the difference between the disorder of chaperone-binding and non-binding proteins is even more pronounced if normalized to their overall tendency to be involved in pairwise protein–protein interactions. We argue that chaperone binding is primarily required for folding of globular proteins, as reflected in an increased preference for chaperones of proteins in which at least one Pfam domain exists. In terms of the functional consequences of chaperone binding of mostly disordered proteins, we suggest that its primary reason is not the assistance of folding, but promotion of assembly with partners. In support of this conclusion, we show that IDPs that bind chaperones also tend to bind other proteins.
format Text
id pubmed-2265518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22655182008-03-08 Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Display No Preference for Chaperone Binding In Vivo Hegyi, Hedi Tompa, Peter PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins (IDPs) are extremely sensitive to proteolysis in vitro, but show no enhanced degradation rates in vivo. Their existence and functioning may be explained if IDPs are preferentially associated with chaperones in the cell, which may offer protection against degradation by proteases. To test this inference, we took pairwise interaction data from high-throughput interaction studies and analyzed to see if predicted disorder correlates with the tendency of chaperone binding by proteins. Our major finding is that disorder predicted by the IUPred algorithm actually shows negative correlation with chaperone binding in E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and metazoa species. Since predicted disorder positively correlates with the tendency of partner binding in the interactome, the difference between the disorder of chaperone-binding and non-binding proteins is even more pronounced if normalized to their overall tendency to be involved in pairwise protein–protein interactions. We argue that chaperone binding is primarily required for folding of globular proteins, as reflected in an increased preference for chaperones of proteins in which at least one Pfam domain exists. In terms of the functional consequences of chaperone binding of mostly disordered proteins, we suggest that its primary reason is not the assistance of folding, but promotion of assembly with partners. In support of this conclusion, we show that IDPs that bind chaperones also tend to bind other proteins. Public Library of Science 2008-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2265518/ /pubmed/18369417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000017 Text en Hegyi and Tompa. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hegyi, Hedi
Tompa, Peter
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Display No Preference for Chaperone Binding In Vivo
title Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Display No Preference for Chaperone Binding In Vivo
title_full Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Display No Preference for Chaperone Binding In Vivo
title_fullStr Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Display No Preference for Chaperone Binding In Vivo
title_full_unstemmed Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Display No Preference for Chaperone Binding In Vivo
title_short Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Display No Preference for Chaperone Binding In Vivo
title_sort intrinsically disordered proteins display no preference for chaperone binding in vivo
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18369417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000017
work_keys_str_mv AT hegyihedi intrinsicallydisorderedproteinsdisplaynopreferenceforchaperonebindinginvivo
AT tompapeter intrinsicallydisorderedproteinsdisplaynopreferenceforchaperonebindinginvivo