Cargando…

Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy

BACKGROUND: Healthcare services often use a carbon monoxide (CO) breath test to validate self-reported smoking and to assess reductions in smoking habit. A cut-off level of ≥ 8 parts per million (p.p.m.) is used to identify smoking. This cut-off requires further validation in pregnant women. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Usmani, Zara C, Craig, Pauline, Shipton, Deborah, Tappin, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265678/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-4
_version_ 1782151504736550912
author Usmani, Zara C
Craig, Pauline
Shipton, Deborah
Tappin, David
author_facet Usmani, Zara C
Craig, Pauline
Shipton, Deborah
Tappin, David
author_sort Usmani, Zara C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare services often use a carbon monoxide (CO) breath test to validate self-reported smoking and to assess reductions in smoking habit. A cut-off level of ≥ 8 parts per million (p.p.m.) is used to identify smoking. This cut-off requires further validation in pregnant women. METHODS: Data on self-reported smoking were assessed in conjunction with breath CO levels. Subjects in the study were 2548 women attending antenatal booking during 12 months. RESULTS: 546/2584 (21.4%) women self-reported as current smokers. A cut-off of 8 ppm identified only 325/546 self-reported smokers (sensitivity 59.4%). 27/2002 self-reported non-smokers had levels greater than 8 ppm (specificity 98.7%). Sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed that CO cut-off levels of 2 or 3 p.p.m. resulted in the best sensitivity and specificity for discriminating apparent smokers and non-smokers. A cut-off of 2 p.p.m. would have identified 468/546 of self-reported smokers (sensitivity 86%). 206/2002 self-reported non-smokers had levels > 2 ppm (specificity 90 %). If all these women were 'true' smokers, the real prevalence of smoking in pregnancy was 26.5% (752/2548) and 27% of true smokers provided false answers to the self-reported question at maternity booking. CONCLUSION: At 8 ppm, many smokers are missed and there may be gross underestimating of levels of smoking in a pregnant population. Results emphasise the need to support a lower cut-off level for the breath CO test closer to 2 or 3 p.p.m. These cut-offs may be more appropriate in the antenatal clinic setting, and are in line with recent recommendations in the non-pregnant population.
format Text
id pubmed-2265678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22656782008-03-08 Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy Usmani, Zara C Craig, Pauline Shipton, Deborah Tappin, David Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: Healthcare services often use a carbon monoxide (CO) breath test to validate self-reported smoking and to assess reductions in smoking habit. A cut-off level of ≥ 8 parts per million (p.p.m.) is used to identify smoking. This cut-off requires further validation in pregnant women. METHODS: Data on self-reported smoking were assessed in conjunction with breath CO levels. Subjects in the study were 2548 women attending antenatal booking during 12 months. RESULTS: 546/2584 (21.4%) women self-reported as current smokers. A cut-off of 8 ppm identified only 325/546 self-reported smokers (sensitivity 59.4%). 27/2002 self-reported non-smokers had levels greater than 8 ppm (specificity 98.7%). Sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed that CO cut-off levels of 2 or 3 p.p.m. resulted in the best sensitivity and specificity for discriminating apparent smokers and non-smokers. A cut-off of 2 p.p.m. would have identified 468/546 of self-reported smokers (sensitivity 86%). 206/2002 self-reported non-smokers had levels > 2 ppm (specificity 90 %). If all these women were 'true' smokers, the real prevalence of smoking in pregnancy was 26.5% (752/2548) and 27% of true smokers provided false answers to the self-reported question at maternity booking. CONCLUSION: At 8 ppm, many smokers are missed and there may be gross underestimating of levels of smoking in a pregnant population. Results emphasise the need to support a lower cut-off level for the breath CO test closer to 2 or 3 p.p.m. These cut-offs may be more appropriate in the antenatal clinic setting, and are in line with recent recommendations in the non-pregnant population. BioMed Central 2008-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2265678/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-4 Text en Copyright © 2008 Usmani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Usmani, Zara C
Craig, Pauline
Shipton, Deborah
Tappin, David
Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy
title Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy
title_full Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy
title_fullStr Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy
title_short Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy
title_sort comparison of co breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265678/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-4
work_keys_str_mv AT usmanizarac comparisonofcobreathtestingandwomensselfreportingofsmokingbehaviourforidentifyingsmokingduringpregnancy
AT craigpauline comparisonofcobreathtestingandwomensselfreportingofsmokingbehaviourforidentifyingsmokingduringpregnancy
AT shiptondeborah comparisonofcobreathtestingandwomensselfreportingofsmokingbehaviourforidentifyingsmokingduringpregnancy
AT tappindavid comparisonofcobreathtestingandwomensselfreportingofsmokingbehaviourforidentifyingsmokingduringpregnancy