Cargando…
Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy
BACKGROUND: Healthcare services often use a carbon monoxide (CO) breath test to validate self-reported smoking and to assess reductions in smoking habit. A cut-off level of ≥ 8 parts per million (p.p.m.) is used to identify smoking. This cut-off requires further validation in pregnant women. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265678/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-4 |
_version_ | 1782151504736550912 |
---|---|
author | Usmani, Zara C Craig, Pauline Shipton, Deborah Tappin, David |
author_facet | Usmani, Zara C Craig, Pauline Shipton, Deborah Tappin, David |
author_sort | Usmani, Zara C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthcare services often use a carbon monoxide (CO) breath test to validate self-reported smoking and to assess reductions in smoking habit. A cut-off level of ≥ 8 parts per million (p.p.m.) is used to identify smoking. This cut-off requires further validation in pregnant women. METHODS: Data on self-reported smoking were assessed in conjunction with breath CO levels. Subjects in the study were 2548 women attending antenatal booking during 12 months. RESULTS: 546/2584 (21.4%) women self-reported as current smokers. A cut-off of 8 ppm identified only 325/546 self-reported smokers (sensitivity 59.4%). 27/2002 self-reported non-smokers had levels greater than 8 ppm (specificity 98.7%). Sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed that CO cut-off levels of 2 or 3 p.p.m. resulted in the best sensitivity and specificity for discriminating apparent smokers and non-smokers. A cut-off of 2 p.p.m. would have identified 468/546 of self-reported smokers (sensitivity 86%). 206/2002 self-reported non-smokers had levels > 2 ppm (specificity 90 %). If all these women were 'true' smokers, the real prevalence of smoking in pregnancy was 26.5% (752/2548) and 27% of true smokers provided false answers to the self-reported question at maternity booking. CONCLUSION: At 8 ppm, many smokers are missed and there may be gross underestimating of levels of smoking in a pregnant population. Results emphasise the need to support a lower cut-off level for the breath CO test closer to 2 or 3 p.p.m. These cut-offs may be more appropriate in the antenatal clinic setting, and are in line with recent recommendations in the non-pregnant population. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2265678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22656782008-03-08 Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy Usmani, Zara C Craig, Pauline Shipton, Deborah Tappin, David Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: Healthcare services often use a carbon monoxide (CO) breath test to validate self-reported smoking and to assess reductions in smoking habit. A cut-off level of ≥ 8 parts per million (p.p.m.) is used to identify smoking. This cut-off requires further validation in pregnant women. METHODS: Data on self-reported smoking were assessed in conjunction with breath CO levels. Subjects in the study were 2548 women attending antenatal booking during 12 months. RESULTS: 546/2584 (21.4%) women self-reported as current smokers. A cut-off of 8 ppm identified only 325/546 self-reported smokers (sensitivity 59.4%). 27/2002 self-reported non-smokers had levels greater than 8 ppm (specificity 98.7%). Sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed that CO cut-off levels of 2 or 3 p.p.m. resulted in the best sensitivity and specificity for discriminating apparent smokers and non-smokers. A cut-off of 2 p.p.m. would have identified 468/546 of self-reported smokers (sensitivity 86%). 206/2002 self-reported non-smokers had levels > 2 ppm (specificity 90 %). If all these women were 'true' smokers, the real prevalence of smoking in pregnancy was 26.5% (752/2548) and 27% of true smokers provided false answers to the self-reported question at maternity booking. CONCLUSION: At 8 ppm, many smokers are missed and there may be gross underestimating of levels of smoking in a pregnant population. Results emphasise the need to support a lower cut-off level for the breath CO test closer to 2 or 3 p.p.m. These cut-offs may be more appropriate in the antenatal clinic setting, and are in line with recent recommendations in the non-pregnant population. BioMed Central 2008-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2265678/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-4 Text en Copyright © 2008 Usmani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Usmani, Zara C Craig, Pauline Shipton, Deborah Tappin, David Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy |
title | Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy |
title_full | Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy |
title_short | Comparison of CO breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy |
title_sort | comparison of co breath testing and women's self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265678/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT usmanizarac comparisonofcobreathtestingandwomensselfreportingofsmokingbehaviourforidentifyingsmokingduringpregnancy AT craigpauline comparisonofcobreathtestingandwomensselfreportingofsmokingbehaviourforidentifyingsmokingduringpregnancy AT shiptondeborah comparisonofcobreathtestingandwomensselfreportingofsmokingbehaviourforidentifyingsmokingduringpregnancy AT tappindavid comparisonofcobreathtestingandwomensselfreportingofsmokingbehaviourforidentifyingsmokingduringpregnancy |