Cargando…
Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential
Although a substantial part of scientific research is collaborative and increasing globalization will probably lead to its increase, very few studies actually investigate the advantages, disadvantages, experiences and lessons learned from collaboration. In environmental epidemiology interdisciplinar...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18208596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-7-3 |
_version_ | 1782151507619086336 |
---|---|
author | Katsouyanni, Klea |
author_facet | Katsouyanni, Klea |
author_sort | Katsouyanni, Klea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although a substantial part of scientific research is collaborative and increasing globalization will probably lead to its increase, very few studies actually investigate the advantages, disadvantages, experiences and lessons learned from collaboration. In environmental epidemiology interdisciplinary collaboration is essential and the contrasting geographical patterns in exposure and disease make multi-location projects essential. This paper is based on a presentation given at the Annual Conference of the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology, Paris 2006, and is attempting to initiate a discussion on a framework for studying collaborative research. A review of the relevant literature showed that indeed collaborative research is rising, in some countries with impressive rates. However, there are substantial differences between countries in their outlook, need and respect for collaboration. In many situations collaborative publications receive more citations than those based on national authorship. The European Union is the most important host of collaborative research, mainly driven by the European Commission through the Framework Programmes. A critical assessment of the tools and trends of collaborative networks under FP6, showed that there was a need for a critical revision, which led to changes in FP7. In conclusion, it is useful to study the characteristics of collaborative research and set targets for the future. The added value for science and for the researchers involved may be assessed. The motivation for collaboration could be increased in the more developed countries. Particular ways to increase the efficiency and interaction in interdisciplinary and intercultural collaboration may be developed. We can work towards "the principles of collaborative research" in Environmental Epidemiology. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2265690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22656902008-03-08 Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential Katsouyanni, Klea Environ Health Commentary Although a substantial part of scientific research is collaborative and increasing globalization will probably lead to its increase, very few studies actually investigate the advantages, disadvantages, experiences and lessons learned from collaboration. In environmental epidemiology interdisciplinary collaboration is essential and the contrasting geographical patterns in exposure and disease make multi-location projects essential. This paper is based on a presentation given at the Annual Conference of the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology, Paris 2006, and is attempting to initiate a discussion on a framework for studying collaborative research. A review of the relevant literature showed that indeed collaborative research is rising, in some countries with impressive rates. However, there are substantial differences between countries in their outlook, need and respect for collaboration. In many situations collaborative publications receive more citations than those based on national authorship. The European Union is the most important host of collaborative research, mainly driven by the European Commission through the Framework Programmes. A critical assessment of the tools and trends of collaborative networks under FP6, showed that there was a need for a critical revision, which led to changes in FP7. In conclusion, it is useful to study the characteristics of collaborative research and set targets for the future. The added value for science and for the researchers involved may be assessed. The motivation for collaboration could be increased in the more developed countries. Particular ways to increase the efficiency and interaction in interdisciplinary and intercultural collaboration may be developed. We can work towards "the principles of collaborative research" in Environmental Epidemiology. BioMed Central 2008-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2265690/ /pubmed/18208596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-7-3 Text en Copyright © 2008 Katsouyanni; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Katsouyanni, Klea Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential |
title | Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential |
title_full | Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential |
title_fullStr | Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential |
title_full_unstemmed | Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential |
title_short | Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential |
title_sort | collaborative research: accomplishments & potential |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18208596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-7-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katsouyanniklea collaborativeresearchaccomplishmentspotential |