Cargando…

Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model

BACKGROUND: Both CT and MRI are complementary to each other in that CT can produce a distinct contour of bones, and MRI can show the shape of both ligaments and bones. It will be ideal to build a CT-MRI combined model to take advantage of complementary information of each modality. This study evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Yeon S, Seon, Jong K, Shin, Vladimir I, Kim, Gyu-Ha, Jeon, Moongu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18234068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-7-6
_version_ 1782151513569755136
author Lee, Yeon S
Seon, Jong K
Shin, Vladimir I
Kim, Gyu-Ha
Jeon, Moongu
author_facet Lee, Yeon S
Seon, Jong K
Shin, Vladimir I
Kim, Gyu-Ha
Jeon, Moongu
author_sort Lee, Yeon S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both CT and MRI are complementary to each other in that CT can produce a distinct contour of bones, and MRI can show the shape of both ligaments and bones. It will be ideal to build a CT-MRI combined model to take advantage of complementary information of each modality. This study evaluated the accuracy of the combined femoral model in terms of anatomical inspection. METHODS: Six normal porcine femora (180 ± 10 days, 3 lefts and 3 rights) with ball markers were scanned by CT and MRI. The 3D/3D registration was performed by two methods, i.e. the landmark-based 3 points-to-3 points and the surface matching using the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. The matching accuracy of the combined model was evaluated with statistical global deviation and locally measure anatomical contour-based deviation. Statistical analysis to assess any significant difference between accuracies of those two methods was performed using univariate repeated measures ANOVA with the Turkey post hoc test. RESULTS: This study revealed that the local 2D contour-based measurement of matching deviation was 0.5 ± 0.3 mm in the femoral condyle, and in the middle femoral shaft. The global 3D contour matching deviation of the landmark-based matching was 1.1 ± 0.3 mm, but local 2D contour deviation through anatomical inspection was much larger as much as 3.0 ± 1.8 mm. CONCLUSION: Even with human-factor derived errors accumulated from segmentation of MRI images, and limited image quality, the matching accuracy of CT-&-MRI combined 3D models was 0.5 ± 0.3 mm in terms of local anatomical inspection.
format Text
id pubmed-2265715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22657152008-03-08 Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model Lee, Yeon S Seon, Jong K Shin, Vladimir I Kim, Gyu-Ha Jeon, Moongu Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Both CT and MRI are complementary to each other in that CT can produce a distinct contour of bones, and MRI can show the shape of both ligaments and bones. It will be ideal to build a CT-MRI combined model to take advantage of complementary information of each modality. This study evaluated the accuracy of the combined femoral model in terms of anatomical inspection. METHODS: Six normal porcine femora (180 ± 10 days, 3 lefts and 3 rights) with ball markers were scanned by CT and MRI. The 3D/3D registration was performed by two methods, i.e. the landmark-based 3 points-to-3 points and the surface matching using the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. The matching accuracy of the combined model was evaluated with statistical global deviation and locally measure anatomical contour-based deviation. Statistical analysis to assess any significant difference between accuracies of those two methods was performed using univariate repeated measures ANOVA with the Turkey post hoc test. RESULTS: This study revealed that the local 2D contour-based measurement of matching deviation was 0.5 ± 0.3 mm in the femoral condyle, and in the middle femoral shaft. The global 3D contour matching deviation of the landmark-based matching was 1.1 ± 0.3 mm, but local 2D contour deviation through anatomical inspection was much larger as much as 3.0 ± 1.8 mm. CONCLUSION: Even with human-factor derived errors accumulated from segmentation of MRI images, and limited image quality, the matching accuracy of CT-&-MRI combined 3D models was 0.5 ± 0.3 mm in terms of local anatomical inspection. BioMed Central 2008-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2265715/ /pubmed/18234068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-7-6 Text en Copyright © 2008 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Yeon S
Seon, Jong K
Shin, Vladimir I
Kim, Gyu-Ha
Jeon, Moongu
Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model
title Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model
title_full Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model
title_fullStr Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model
title_short Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model
title_sort anatomical evaluation of ct-mri combined femoral model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18234068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-7-6
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyeons anatomicalevaluationofctmricombinedfemoralmodel
AT seonjongk anatomicalevaluationofctmricombinedfemoralmodel
AT shinvladimiri anatomicalevaluationofctmricombinedfemoralmodel
AT kimgyuha anatomicalevaluationofctmricombinedfemoralmodel
AT jeonmoongu anatomicalevaluationofctmricombinedfemoralmodel