Cargando…

Checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during DNA re-replication in fission yeast

BACKGROUND: Although much is known about molecular mechanisms that prevent re-initiation of DNA replication on newly replicated DNA during a single cell cycle, knowledge is sparse regarding the regions that are most susceptible to re-replication when those mechanisms are bypassed and regarding the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mickle, Katie L, Oliva, Anna, Huberman, Joel A, Leatherwood, Janet
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18154680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-119
_version_ 1782151515012595712
author Mickle, Katie L
Oliva, Anna
Huberman, Joel A
Leatherwood, Janet
author_facet Mickle, Katie L
Oliva, Anna
Huberman, Joel A
Leatherwood, Janet
author_sort Mickle, Katie L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although much is known about molecular mechanisms that prevent re-initiation of DNA replication on newly replicated DNA during a single cell cycle, knowledge is sparse regarding the regions that are most susceptible to re-replication when those mechanisms are bypassed and regarding the extents to which checkpoint pathways modulate re-replication. We used microarrays to learn more about these issues in wild-type and checkpoint-mutant cells of the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. RESULTS: We found that over-expressing a non-phosphorylatable form of the replication-initiation protein, Cdc18 (known as Cdc6 in other eukaryotes), drove re-replication of DNA sequences genome-wide, rather than forcing high level amplification of just a few sequences. Moderate variations in extents of re-replication generated regions spanning hundreds of kilobases that were amplified (or not) ~2-fold more (or less) than average. However, these regions showed little correlation with replication origins used during S phase. The extents and locations of amplified regions in cells deleted for the checkpoint genes encoding Rad3 (ortholog of human ATR and budding yeast Mec1) and Cds1 (ortholog of human Chk2 and budding yeast Rad53) were similar to those in wild-type cells. Relatively minor but distinct effects, including increased re-replication of heterochromatic regions, were found specifically in cells lacking Rad3. These might be due to Cds1-independent roles for Rad3 in regulating re-replication and/or due to the fact that cells lacking Rad3 continued to divide during re-replication, unlike wild-type cells or cells lacking Cds1. In both wild-type and checkpoint-mutant cells, regions near telomeres were particularly susceptible to re-replication. Highly re-replicated telomere-proximal regions (50–100 kb) were, in each case, followed by some of the least re-replicated DNA in the genome. CONCLUSION: The origins used, and the extent of replication fork progression, during re-replication are largely independent of the replication and DNA-damage checkpoint pathways mediated by Cds1 and Rad3. The fission yeast pattern of telomere-proximal amplification adjacent to a region of under-replication has also been seen in the distantly-related budding yeast, which suggests that subtelomeric sequences may be a promising place to look for DNA re-replication in other organisms.
format Text
id pubmed-2265721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22657212008-03-08 Checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during DNA re-replication in fission yeast Mickle, Katie L Oliva, Anna Huberman, Joel A Leatherwood, Janet BMC Mol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Although much is known about molecular mechanisms that prevent re-initiation of DNA replication on newly replicated DNA during a single cell cycle, knowledge is sparse regarding the regions that are most susceptible to re-replication when those mechanisms are bypassed and regarding the extents to which checkpoint pathways modulate re-replication. We used microarrays to learn more about these issues in wild-type and checkpoint-mutant cells of the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. RESULTS: We found that over-expressing a non-phosphorylatable form of the replication-initiation protein, Cdc18 (known as Cdc6 in other eukaryotes), drove re-replication of DNA sequences genome-wide, rather than forcing high level amplification of just a few sequences. Moderate variations in extents of re-replication generated regions spanning hundreds of kilobases that were amplified (or not) ~2-fold more (or less) than average. However, these regions showed little correlation with replication origins used during S phase. The extents and locations of amplified regions in cells deleted for the checkpoint genes encoding Rad3 (ortholog of human ATR and budding yeast Mec1) and Cds1 (ortholog of human Chk2 and budding yeast Rad53) were similar to those in wild-type cells. Relatively minor but distinct effects, including increased re-replication of heterochromatic regions, were found specifically in cells lacking Rad3. These might be due to Cds1-independent roles for Rad3 in regulating re-replication and/or due to the fact that cells lacking Rad3 continued to divide during re-replication, unlike wild-type cells or cells lacking Cds1. In both wild-type and checkpoint-mutant cells, regions near telomeres were particularly susceptible to re-replication. Highly re-replicated telomere-proximal regions (50–100 kb) were, in each case, followed by some of the least re-replicated DNA in the genome. CONCLUSION: The origins used, and the extent of replication fork progression, during re-replication are largely independent of the replication and DNA-damage checkpoint pathways mediated by Cds1 and Rad3. The fission yeast pattern of telomere-proximal amplification adjacent to a region of under-replication has also been seen in the distantly-related budding yeast, which suggests that subtelomeric sequences may be a promising place to look for DNA re-replication in other organisms. BioMed Central 2007-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2265721/ /pubmed/18154680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-119 Text en Copyright © 2007 Mickle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mickle, Katie L
Oliva, Anna
Huberman, Joel A
Leatherwood, Janet
Checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during DNA re-replication in fission yeast
title Checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during DNA re-replication in fission yeast
title_full Checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during DNA re-replication in fission yeast
title_fullStr Checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during DNA re-replication in fission yeast
title_full_unstemmed Checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during DNA re-replication in fission yeast
title_short Checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during DNA re-replication in fission yeast
title_sort checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during dna re-replication in fission yeast
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18154680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-119
work_keys_str_mv AT micklekatiel checkpointeffectsandtelomereamplificationduringdnarereplicationinfissionyeast
AT olivaanna checkpointeffectsandtelomereamplificationduringdnarereplicationinfissionyeast
AT hubermanjoela checkpointeffectsandtelomereamplificationduringdnarereplicationinfissionyeast
AT leatherwoodjanet checkpointeffectsandtelomereamplificationduringdnarereplicationinfissionyeast