Cargando…

A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) are treatment modalities used to treat refractory angina pectoris, with the major aim of such treatment being the relief of disabling symptoms. This study compared the change in myocardial perfusion f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Sadia N, McNab, Duncan C, Sharples, Linda D, Freeman, Carol J, Hardy, Ian, Stone, David L, Schofield, Peter M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18304366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-9
_version_ 1782151542067953664
author Khan, Sadia N
McNab, Duncan C
Sharples, Linda D
Freeman, Carol J
Hardy, Ian
Stone, David L
Schofield, Peter M
author_facet Khan, Sadia N
McNab, Duncan C
Sharples, Linda D
Freeman, Carol J
Hardy, Ian
Stone, David L
Schofield, Peter M
author_sort Khan, Sadia N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) are treatment modalities used to treat refractory angina pectoris, with the major aim of such treatment being the relief of disabling symptoms. This study compared the change in myocardial perfusion following SCS and PMR treatment. METHODS: Subjects with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3/4 angina and reversible perfusion defects as assessed by single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion scintigraphy were randomised to SCS (34) or PMR (34). 28 subjects in each group underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging 12 months post intervention. Visual scoring of perfusion images was performed using a 20-segment model and a scale of 0 to 4. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) baseline summed rest score (SRS) and stress scores (SSS) were 4.6 (5.7) and 13.6 (9.0) in the PMR group and 6.1 (7.4) and 16.8 (11.6) in the SCS group. At 12 months, SRS was 5.5 (6.0) and SSS 15.3 (11.3) in the PMR group and 6.9 (8.2) and 15.1 (10.9) in the SCS group. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups adjusted for baseline (p = 1.0 for SRS, p = 0.29 for SSS). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in myocardial perfusion one year post treatment with SCS or PMR.
format Text
id pubmed-2266700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22667002008-03-11 A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial Khan, Sadia N McNab, Duncan C Sharples, Linda D Freeman, Carol J Hardy, Ian Stone, David L Schofield, Peter M Trials Research BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) are treatment modalities used to treat refractory angina pectoris, with the major aim of such treatment being the relief of disabling symptoms. This study compared the change in myocardial perfusion following SCS and PMR treatment. METHODS: Subjects with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3/4 angina and reversible perfusion defects as assessed by single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion scintigraphy were randomised to SCS (34) or PMR (34). 28 subjects in each group underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging 12 months post intervention. Visual scoring of perfusion images was performed using a 20-segment model and a scale of 0 to 4. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) baseline summed rest score (SRS) and stress scores (SSS) were 4.6 (5.7) and 13.6 (9.0) in the PMR group and 6.1 (7.4) and 16.8 (11.6) in the SCS group. At 12 months, SRS was 5.5 (6.0) and SSS 15.3 (11.3) in the PMR group and 6.9 (8.2) and 15.1 (10.9) in the SCS group. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups adjusted for baseline (p = 1.0 for SRS, p = 0.29 for SSS). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in myocardial perfusion one year post treatment with SCS or PMR. BioMed Central 2008-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2266700/ /pubmed/18304366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-9 Text en Copyright © 2008 Khan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Khan, Sadia N
McNab, Duncan C
Sharples, Linda D
Freeman, Carol J
Hardy, Ian
Stone, David L
Schofield, Peter M
A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial
title A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial
title_full A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial
title_fullStr A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial
title_short A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial
title_sort study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18304366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-9
work_keys_str_mv AT khansadian astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT mcnabduncanc astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT sharpleslindad astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT freemancarolj astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT hardyian astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT stonedavidl astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT schofieldpeterm astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT khansadian studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT mcnabduncanc studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT sharpleslindad studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT freemancarolj studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT hardyian studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT stonedavidl studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial
AT schofieldpeterm studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial