Cargando…
A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) are treatment modalities used to treat refractory angina pectoris, with the major aim of such treatment being the relief of disabling symptoms. This study compared the change in myocardial perfusion f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18304366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-9 |
_version_ | 1782151542067953664 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Sadia N McNab, Duncan C Sharples, Linda D Freeman, Carol J Hardy, Ian Stone, David L Schofield, Peter M |
author_facet | Khan, Sadia N McNab, Duncan C Sharples, Linda D Freeman, Carol J Hardy, Ian Stone, David L Schofield, Peter M |
author_sort | Khan, Sadia N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) are treatment modalities used to treat refractory angina pectoris, with the major aim of such treatment being the relief of disabling symptoms. This study compared the change in myocardial perfusion following SCS and PMR treatment. METHODS: Subjects with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3/4 angina and reversible perfusion defects as assessed by single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion scintigraphy were randomised to SCS (34) or PMR (34). 28 subjects in each group underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging 12 months post intervention. Visual scoring of perfusion images was performed using a 20-segment model and a scale of 0 to 4. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) baseline summed rest score (SRS) and stress scores (SSS) were 4.6 (5.7) and 13.6 (9.0) in the PMR group and 6.1 (7.4) and 16.8 (11.6) in the SCS group. At 12 months, SRS was 5.5 (6.0) and SSS 15.3 (11.3) in the PMR group and 6.9 (8.2) and 15.1 (10.9) in the SCS group. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups adjusted for baseline (p = 1.0 for SRS, p = 0.29 for SSS). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in myocardial perfusion one year post treatment with SCS or PMR. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2266700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22667002008-03-11 A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial Khan, Sadia N McNab, Duncan C Sharples, Linda D Freeman, Carol J Hardy, Ian Stone, David L Schofield, Peter M Trials Research BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) are treatment modalities used to treat refractory angina pectoris, with the major aim of such treatment being the relief of disabling symptoms. This study compared the change in myocardial perfusion following SCS and PMR treatment. METHODS: Subjects with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3/4 angina and reversible perfusion defects as assessed by single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion scintigraphy were randomised to SCS (34) or PMR (34). 28 subjects in each group underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging 12 months post intervention. Visual scoring of perfusion images was performed using a 20-segment model and a scale of 0 to 4. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) baseline summed rest score (SRS) and stress scores (SSS) were 4.6 (5.7) and 13.6 (9.0) in the PMR group and 6.1 (7.4) and 16.8 (11.6) in the SCS group. At 12 months, SRS was 5.5 (6.0) and SSS 15.3 (11.3) in the PMR group and 6.9 (8.2) and 15.1 (10.9) in the SCS group. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups adjusted for baseline (p = 1.0 for SRS, p = 0.29 for SSS). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in myocardial perfusion one year post treatment with SCS or PMR. BioMed Central 2008-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2266700/ /pubmed/18304366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-9 Text en Copyright © 2008 Khan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Khan, Sadia N McNab, Duncan C Sharples, Linda D Freeman, Carol J Hardy, Ian Stone, David L Schofield, Peter M A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial |
title | A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial |
title_full | A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial |
title_fullStr | A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial |
title_short | A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial |
title_sort | study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18304366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khansadian astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT mcnabduncanc astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT sharpleslindad astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT freemancarolj astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT hardyian astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT stonedavidl astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT schofieldpeterm astudytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT khansadian studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT mcnabduncanc studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT sharpleslindad studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT freemancarolj studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT hardyian studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT stonedavidl studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial AT schofieldpeterm studytoassesschangesinmyocardialperfusionaftertreatmentwithspinalcordstimulationandpercutaneousmyocardiallaserrevascularisationdatafromarandomisedtrial |