Cargando…
Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population
BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study is to establish an optimal cutoff point for distress measured with the corresponding scale of the 4DSQ, using the prediction of sickness absence as a criterion. The cutoff point should result in a measure that can be used as a credible selection instrum...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18205912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-3 |
_version_ | 1782151558849363968 |
---|---|
author | van Rhenen, Willem van Dijk, Frank JH Schaufeli, Wilmar B Blonk, Roland WB |
author_facet | van Rhenen, Willem van Dijk, Frank JH Schaufeli, Wilmar B Blonk, Roland WB |
author_sort | van Rhenen, Willem |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study is to establish an optimal cutoff point for distress measured with the corresponding scale of the 4DSQ, using the prediction of sickness absence as a criterion. The cutoff point should result in a measure that can be used as a credible selection instrument for sickness absence in occupational health practice and in future studies on distress and mental disorders. METHODS: Distress is measured using the Four Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ), a 50-item self-report questionnaire, in a working population with and without sickness absence due to distress. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for various potential cutoff points, and a receiver operating characteristics analysis was conducted. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A distress cutoff point of ≥11 was defined. The choice was based on a challenging specificity and negative predictive value and indicates a distress level at which an employee is presumably at risk for subsequent sick leave on psychological grounds. The defined distress cutoff point is appropriate for use in occupational health practice and in studies of distress in working populations. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2266771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22667712008-03-11 Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population van Rhenen, Willem van Dijk, Frank JH Schaufeli, Wilmar B Blonk, Roland WB J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study is to establish an optimal cutoff point for distress measured with the corresponding scale of the 4DSQ, using the prediction of sickness absence as a criterion. The cutoff point should result in a measure that can be used as a credible selection instrument for sickness absence in occupational health practice and in future studies on distress and mental disorders. METHODS: Distress is measured using the Four Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ), a 50-item self-report questionnaire, in a working population with and without sickness absence due to distress. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for various potential cutoff points, and a receiver operating characteristics analysis was conducted. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A distress cutoff point of ≥11 was defined. The choice was based on a challenging specificity and negative predictive value and indicates a distress level at which an employee is presumably at risk for subsequent sick leave on psychological grounds. The defined distress cutoff point is appropriate for use in occupational health practice and in studies of distress in working populations. BioMed Central 2008-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2266771/ /pubmed/18205912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-3 Text en Copyright © 2008 van Rhenen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research van Rhenen, Willem van Dijk, Frank JH Schaufeli, Wilmar B Blonk, Roland WB Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population |
title | Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population |
title_full | Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population |
title_fullStr | Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population |
title_full_unstemmed | Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population |
title_short | Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population |
title_sort | distress or no distress, that's the question: a cutoff point for distress in a working population |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18205912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanrhenenwillem distressornodistressthatsthequestionacutoffpointfordistressinaworkingpopulation AT vandijkfrankjh distressornodistressthatsthequestionacutoffpointfordistressinaworkingpopulation AT schaufeliwilmarb distressornodistressthatsthequestionacutoffpointfordistressinaworkingpopulation AT blonkrolandwb distressornodistressthatsthequestionacutoffpointfordistressinaworkingpopulation |