Cargando…

Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study is to establish an optimal cutoff point for distress measured with the corresponding scale of the 4DSQ, using the prediction of sickness absence as a criterion. The cutoff point should result in a measure that can be used as a credible selection instrum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Rhenen, Willem, van Dijk, Frank JH, Schaufeli, Wilmar B, Blonk, Roland WB
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18205912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-3
_version_ 1782151558849363968
author van Rhenen, Willem
van Dijk, Frank JH
Schaufeli, Wilmar B
Blonk, Roland WB
author_facet van Rhenen, Willem
van Dijk, Frank JH
Schaufeli, Wilmar B
Blonk, Roland WB
author_sort van Rhenen, Willem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study is to establish an optimal cutoff point for distress measured with the corresponding scale of the 4DSQ, using the prediction of sickness absence as a criterion. The cutoff point should result in a measure that can be used as a credible selection instrument for sickness absence in occupational health practice and in future studies on distress and mental disorders. METHODS: Distress is measured using the Four Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ), a 50-item self-report questionnaire, in a working population with and without sickness absence due to distress. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for various potential cutoff points, and a receiver operating characteristics analysis was conducted. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A distress cutoff point of ≥11 was defined. The choice was based on a challenging specificity and negative predictive value and indicates a distress level at which an employee is presumably at risk for subsequent sick leave on psychological grounds. The defined distress cutoff point is appropriate for use in occupational health practice and in studies of distress in working populations.
format Text
id pubmed-2266771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22667712008-03-11 Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population van Rhenen, Willem van Dijk, Frank JH Schaufeli, Wilmar B Blonk, Roland WB J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study is to establish an optimal cutoff point for distress measured with the corresponding scale of the 4DSQ, using the prediction of sickness absence as a criterion. The cutoff point should result in a measure that can be used as a credible selection instrument for sickness absence in occupational health practice and in future studies on distress and mental disorders. METHODS: Distress is measured using the Four Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ), a 50-item self-report questionnaire, in a working population with and without sickness absence due to distress. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for various potential cutoff points, and a receiver operating characteristics analysis was conducted. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A distress cutoff point of ≥11 was defined. The choice was based on a challenging specificity and negative predictive value and indicates a distress level at which an employee is presumably at risk for subsequent sick leave on psychological grounds. The defined distress cutoff point is appropriate for use in occupational health practice and in studies of distress in working populations. BioMed Central 2008-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2266771/ /pubmed/18205912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-3 Text en Copyright © 2008 van Rhenen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
van Rhenen, Willem
van Dijk, Frank JH
Schaufeli, Wilmar B
Blonk, Roland WB
Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population
title Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population
title_full Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population
title_fullStr Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population
title_full_unstemmed Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population
title_short Distress or no distress, that's the question: A cutoff point for distress in a working population
title_sort distress or no distress, that's the question: a cutoff point for distress in a working population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18205912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vanrhenenwillem distressornodistressthatsthequestionacutoffpointfordistressinaworkingpopulation
AT vandijkfrankjh distressornodistressthatsthequestionacutoffpointfordistressinaworkingpopulation
AT schaufeliwilmarb distressornodistressthatsthequestionacutoffpointfordistressinaworkingpopulation
AT blonkrolandwb distressornodistressthatsthequestionacutoffpointfordistressinaworkingpopulation