Cargando…
Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities
Treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) may be the cause of second malignancies in long-term survivors. Our aim was to investigate whether survivors present a higher risk of malignancy than the general population according to treatment received. We analysed data for 16 705 BC survivors treat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18268495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604241 |
_version_ | 1782151572121190400 |
---|---|
author | Kirova, Y M De Rycke, Y Gambotti, L Pierga, J-Y Asselain, B Fourquet, A |
author_facet | Kirova, Y M De Rycke, Y Gambotti, L Pierga, J-Y Asselain, B Fourquet, A |
author_sort | Kirova, Y M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) may be the cause of second malignancies in long-term survivors. Our aim was to investigate whether survivors present a higher risk of malignancy than the general population according to treatment received. We analysed data for 16 705 BC survivors treated at the Curie Institute (1981–1997) by either chemotherapy (various regimens), radiotherapy (high-energy photons from a (60)Co unit or linear accelerator) and/or hormone therapy (2–5 years of tamoxifen). We calculated age-standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for each malignancy, using data for the general French population from five regional registries. At a median follow-up 10.5 years, 709 patients had developed a second malignancy. The greatest increases in risk were for leukaemia (SIR: 2.07 (1.52–2.75)), ovarian cancer (SIR: 1.6 (1.27–2.04)) and gynaecological (cervical/endometrial) cancer (SIR: 1.6 (1.34–1.89); P<0.0001). The SIR for gastrointestinal cancer, the most common malignancy, was 0.82 (0.70–0.95; P<0.007). The increase in leukaemia was most strongly related to chemotherapy and that in gynaecological cancers to hormone therapy. Radiotherapy alone also had a significant, although lesser, effect on leukaemia and gynaecological cancer incidence. The increased risk of sarcomas and lung cancer was attributed to radiotherapy. No increased risk was observed for malignant melanoma, lymphoma, genitourinary, thyroid or head and neck cancer. There is a significantly increased risk of several kinds of second malignancy in women treated for BC, compared with the general population. This increase may be related to adjuvant treatment in some cases. However, the absolute risk is small. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2266852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22668522009-09-10 Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities Kirova, Y M De Rycke, Y Gambotti, L Pierga, J-Y Asselain, B Fourquet, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study Treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) may be the cause of second malignancies in long-term survivors. Our aim was to investigate whether survivors present a higher risk of malignancy than the general population according to treatment received. We analysed data for 16 705 BC survivors treated at the Curie Institute (1981–1997) by either chemotherapy (various regimens), radiotherapy (high-energy photons from a (60)Co unit or linear accelerator) and/or hormone therapy (2–5 years of tamoxifen). We calculated age-standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for each malignancy, using data for the general French population from five regional registries. At a median follow-up 10.5 years, 709 patients had developed a second malignancy. The greatest increases in risk were for leukaemia (SIR: 2.07 (1.52–2.75)), ovarian cancer (SIR: 1.6 (1.27–2.04)) and gynaecological (cervical/endometrial) cancer (SIR: 1.6 (1.34–1.89); P<0.0001). The SIR for gastrointestinal cancer, the most common malignancy, was 0.82 (0.70–0.95; P<0.007). The increase in leukaemia was most strongly related to chemotherapy and that in gynaecological cancers to hormone therapy. Radiotherapy alone also had a significant, although lesser, effect on leukaemia and gynaecological cancer incidence. The increased risk of sarcomas and lung cancer was attributed to radiotherapy. No increased risk was observed for malignant melanoma, lymphoma, genitourinary, thyroid or head and neck cancer. There is a significantly increased risk of several kinds of second malignancy in women treated for BC, compared with the general population. This increase may be related to adjuvant treatment in some cases. However, the absolute risk is small. Nature Publishing Group 2008-03-11 2008-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2266852/ /pubmed/18268495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604241 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Kirova, Y M De Rycke, Y Gambotti, L Pierga, J-Y Asselain, B Fourquet, A Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities |
title | Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities |
title_full | Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities |
title_fullStr | Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities |
title_full_unstemmed | Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities |
title_short | Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities |
title_sort | second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18268495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirovaym secondmalignanciesafterbreastcancertheimpactofdifferenttreatmentmodalities AT deryckey secondmalignanciesafterbreastcancertheimpactofdifferenttreatmentmodalities AT gambottil secondmalignanciesafterbreastcancertheimpactofdifferenttreatmentmodalities AT piergajy secondmalignanciesafterbreastcancertheimpactofdifferenttreatmentmodalities AT asselainb secondmalignanciesafterbreastcancertheimpactofdifferenttreatmentmodalities AT fourqueta secondmalignanciesafterbreastcancertheimpactofdifferenttreatmentmodalities |