Cargando…

Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis

BACKGROUND: Stress shielding of the proximal femur has been observed in a number of conventional cementless implants used in total hip arthroplasty. Short femoral-neck implants are claiming less interference with the biomechanics of the proximal femur. The goal of this study was to investigate the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Decking, Ralf, Rokahr, Christoph, Zurstegge, Matthias, Simon, Ulrich, Decking, Jens
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2267172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18237437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-17
_version_ 1782151616561938432
author Decking, Ralf
Rokahr, Christoph
Zurstegge, Matthias
Simon, Ulrich
Decking, Jens
author_facet Decking, Ralf
Rokahr, Christoph
Zurstegge, Matthias
Simon, Ulrich
Decking, Jens
author_sort Decking, Ralf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stress shielding of the proximal femur has been observed in a number of conventional cementless implants used in total hip arthroplasty. Short femoral-neck implants are claiming less interference with the biomechanics of the proximal femur. The goal of this study was to investigate the changes of bone-mineral density in the proximal femur and the clinical outcome after implantation of a short femoral-neck prosthesis. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the clinical outcome and the changes of bone mineral density of the proximal femur up to one year after implantation of a short femoral neck prosthesis in 20 patients with a mean age of 47 years (range 17 to 65). Clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip Score. The WOMAC was used as a patient-relevant outcome-measure. The bone mineral density was determined using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, performed 10 days, three months and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The Harris Hip Score improved from an average preoperative score of 46 to a postoperative score at 12 months of 89 points, the global WOMAC index from 5,3 preoperatively to 0,8 at 12 months postoperatively. In contrast to conventional implants, the DEXA-scans overall revealed a slight increase of bone mineral density in the proximal femur in the 12 months following the implantation. CONCLUSION: The short femoral neck stem lead to a distinct bone reaction. This was significantly different when compared to the changes in bone mineral density reported after implantation of conventional implants.
format Text
id pubmed-2267172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22671722008-03-13 Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis Decking, Ralf Rokahr, Christoph Zurstegge, Matthias Simon, Ulrich Decking, Jens BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Stress shielding of the proximal femur has been observed in a number of conventional cementless implants used in total hip arthroplasty. Short femoral-neck implants are claiming less interference with the biomechanics of the proximal femur. The goal of this study was to investigate the changes of bone-mineral density in the proximal femur and the clinical outcome after implantation of a short femoral-neck prosthesis. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the clinical outcome and the changes of bone mineral density of the proximal femur up to one year after implantation of a short femoral neck prosthesis in 20 patients with a mean age of 47 years (range 17 to 65). Clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip Score. The WOMAC was used as a patient-relevant outcome-measure. The bone mineral density was determined using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, performed 10 days, three months and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The Harris Hip Score improved from an average preoperative score of 46 to a postoperative score at 12 months of 89 points, the global WOMAC index from 5,3 preoperatively to 0,8 at 12 months postoperatively. In contrast to conventional implants, the DEXA-scans overall revealed a slight increase of bone mineral density in the proximal femur in the 12 months following the implantation. CONCLUSION: The short femoral neck stem lead to a distinct bone reaction. This was significantly different when compared to the changes in bone mineral density reported after implantation of conventional implants. BioMed Central 2008-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2267172/ /pubmed/18237437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-17 Text en Copyright © 2008 Decking et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Decking, Ralf
Rokahr, Christoph
Zurstegge, Matthias
Simon, Ulrich
Decking, Jens
Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis
title Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis
title_full Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis
title_fullStr Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis
title_short Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis
title_sort maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2267172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18237437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-17
work_keys_str_mv AT deckingralf maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis
AT rokahrchristoph maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis
AT zursteggematthias maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis
AT simonulrich maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis
AT deckingjens maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis