Cargando…
Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis
BACKGROUND: Stress shielding of the proximal femur has been observed in a number of conventional cementless implants used in total hip arthroplasty. Short femoral-neck implants are claiming less interference with the biomechanics of the proximal femur. The goal of this study was to investigate the c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2267172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18237437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-17 |
_version_ | 1782151616561938432 |
---|---|
author | Decking, Ralf Rokahr, Christoph Zurstegge, Matthias Simon, Ulrich Decking, Jens |
author_facet | Decking, Ralf Rokahr, Christoph Zurstegge, Matthias Simon, Ulrich Decking, Jens |
author_sort | Decking, Ralf |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stress shielding of the proximal femur has been observed in a number of conventional cementless implants used in total hip arthroplasty. Short femoral-neck implants are claiming less interference with the biomechanics of the proximal femur. The goal of this study was to investigate the changes of bone-mineral density in the proximal femur and the clinical outcome after implantation of a short femoral-neck prosthesis. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the clinical outcome and the changes of bone mineral density of the proximal femur up to one year after implantation of a short femoral neck prosthesis in 20 patients with a mean age of 47 years (range 17 to 65). Clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip Score. The WOMAC was used as a patient-relevant outcome-measure. The bone mineral density was determined using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, performed 10 days, three months and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The Harris Hip Score improved from an average preoperative score of 46 to a postoperative score at 12 months of 89 points, the global WOMAC index from 5,3 preoperatively to 0,8 at 12 months postoperatively. In contrast to conventional implants, the DEXA-scans overall revealed a slight increase of bone mineral density in the proximal femur in the 12 months following the implantation. CONCLUSION: The short femoral neck stem lead to a distinct bone reaction. This was significantly different when compared to the changes in bone mineral density reported after implantation of conventional implants. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2267172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22671722008-03-13 Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis Decking, Ralf Rokahr, Christoph Zurstegge, Matthias Simon, Ulrich Decking, Jens BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Stress shielding of the proximal femur has been observed in a number of conventional cementless implants used in total hip arthroplasty. Short femoral-neck implants are claiming less interference with the biomechanics of the proximal femur. The goal of this study was to investigate the changes of bone-mineral density in the proximal femur and the clinical outcome after implantation of a short femoral-neck prosthesis. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the clinical outcome and the changes of bone mineral density of the proximal femur up to one year after implantation of a short femoral neck prosthesis in 20 patients with a mean age of 47 years (range 17 to 65). Clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip Score. The WOMAC was used as a patient-relevant outcome-measure. The bone mineral density was determined using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, performed 10 days, three months and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The Harris Hip Score improved from an average preoperative score of 46 to a postoperative score at 12 months of 89 points, the global WOMAC index from 5,3 preoperatively to 0,8 at 12 months postoperatively. In contrast to conventional implants, the DEXA-scans overall revealed a slight increase of bone mineral density in the proximal femur in the 12 months following the implantation. CONCLUSION: The short femoral neck stem lead to a distinct bone reaction. This was significantly different when compared to the changes in bone mineral density reported after implantation of conventional implants. BioMed Central 2008-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2267172/ /pubmed/18237437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-17 Text en Copyright © 2008 Decking et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Decking, Ralf Rokahr, Christoph Zurstegge, Matthias Simon, Ulrich Decking, Jens Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis |
title | Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis |
title_full | Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis |
title_fullStr | Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis |
title_short | Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis |
title_sort | maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2267172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18237437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deckingralf maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis AT rokahrchristoph maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis AT zursteggematthias maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis AT simonulrich maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis AT deckingjens maintenanceofbonemineraldensityafterimplantationofafemoralneckhipprosthesis |