Cargando…
Content and communication: How can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing?
BACKGROUND: Peer review is assumed to improve the quality of research reports as tools for scientific communication, yet strong evidence that this outcome is obtained consistently has been elusive. Failure to distinguish between aspects of discipline-specific content and aspects of the writing or us...
Autor principal: | Shashok, Karen |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2268697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18237378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Writing a discussion section: how to integrate substantive and statistical expertise
por: Höfler, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Developing essential professional skills: a framework for teaching and learning about feedback
por: Henderson, Penny, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Improving utilization of and retention in PMTCT services: Can behavioral economics help?
por: Taylor, Nicholas Kenji, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Plagiarism in scientific writing: words or ideas?
por: Habibzadeh, Farrokh, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Can tobacco dependence provide insights into other drug addictions?
por: DiFranza, Joseph R.
Publicado: (2016)