Cargando…

The new Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations on glucose control should be reconsidered

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Schultz, Marcus J., de Graaff, Mart J., Kuiper, Michael A., Spronk, Peter E.
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:	Correspondence
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2271082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18286263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1027-6

Ejemplares similares

Comment on “Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008” by Dellinger et al.
por: Spoelstra - de Man, A. M. E., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Legislation on research involving patients who are (temporarily) unable to give informed consent: differences between European countries
por: Kuiper, Michael A., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Quality of evidence supporting Surviving Sepsis Campaign Recommendations
por: Rello, Jordi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Tight glycaemic control: intelligent technology or a nurse-wise strategy?
por: de Graaff, Mart J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Balneotherapy in the era of COVID-19: should it be recommended or not?
por: Guvener, Orhan
Publicado: (2020)

Reconsidering the COVID-19 vaccine strategy in West and Central Africa
por: Msellati, Philippe, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Glucontrol, no control, or out of control?
por: Schultz, Marcus J., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Analysis of factors influencing 3-and 6-h compliance with the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines based on medical-quality intensive care unit data from China
por: Wang, Lu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Should Hepatitis B Serosurveys Methodology Be Reconsidered?
Publicado: (2010)

Should we reconsider how to assess eutrophication?
por: Polimene, L, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Efficacy of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics: Need to reconsider the empirical use of cefepime
por: Kotwal, A., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Costs of severe sepsis according to the guidelines of the 'Surviving Sepsis Campaign'
por: de Anda, G Vazquez, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

What is new and different in the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines
por: Prescott, Hallie C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Fourth Surviving Sepsis Campaign’s hemodynamic recommendations: a step forward or a return to chaos?
por: Hernández, Glenn, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Viewpoint: Weak Scientific Basis for the Recommendation of Executive Summary of Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021
por: Nath, Soumya Sankar, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Why we should not recommend or offer fluvoxamine to COVID-19 patients?
por: Trkulja, Vladimir
Publicado: (2022)

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign sepsis change bundles and clinical practice
por: Dellinger, R Phillip, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign implementation on severe sepsis outcome
por: Silva, E
Publicado: (2011)

Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock
por: Coopersmith, Craig M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Ivermectin Should Not Be Recommended to Treat Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome 2 Infection
por: Boven, A G, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Screening for Charles Bonnet syndrome: Should the definition be reconsidered?
por: Satgunam, PremNandhini, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Making the GRADE: how useful are the new Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines?
por: Vo, Mai, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of Surviving Sepsis Campaign implementation in Brazil
por: Machado, F, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Survivors of the Punjab Campaigns
por: Wimberley, C. N. C.
Publicado: (1909)

Reconsidering lactate as a sepsis risk biomarker
por: Moran, John L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Differences in compliance with Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations according to hospital entrance time: day versus night
por: Almeida, Mónica, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

ICU mortality rates in patients with sepsis before and after the Surviving Sepsis Campaign
por: Melville, J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Should We Avoid Saline in Sepsis? It’s Probably Too Early to Definitively Conclude
por: Gueret, Gildas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Regional anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a time to reconsider practices? (Letter #1)
por: Soberón, José R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Regional anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a time to reconsider practices? (Letter #2)
por: Aliste, Julian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Provider/patient conflict: is it time to reconsider the contraindication for videolaryngoscope use in a bleeding/soiled airway?
por: Turkstra, Timothy P., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of an educational program on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign implementation for sepsis management
por: d'Empaire, Pablo Perez, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

V.D. Campaign in Calcutta
por: Sarkar, M.
Publicado: (1947)

Adsorptive hemofiltration for sepsis management: expert recommendations based on the Asia Pacific experience
por: Zhang, Ling, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Should the laws of gravitation be reconsidered?: the scientific legacy of Maurice Allais
por: Múnera, Héctor A
Publicado: (2011)

The statistical interpretation of pilot trials: should significance thresholds be reconsidered?
por: Lee, Ellen C, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Diets for patients with chronic kidney disease, should we reconsider?
por: Mitch, William E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Unexpected Discoveries Should Be Reconsidered in Science—A Look to the Past?
por: Foletti, Alberto, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Zoonosis–Why we should reconsider “What's in a name?”
por: Singh, Balbir B., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Should we reconsider high-risk features in thyroid ultrasonography?
por: Canpolat, Asena Gökçay, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_mpd4eesajqdpi0kdq2equ0m1kg