Cargando…

The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms

During embryogenesis, multicellular animals are shaped via cell proliferation, cell rearrangement, and apoptosis. At the end of development, tissue architecture is then maintained through balanced rates of cell proliferation and loss. Here, we take an in silico approach to look for generic systems f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basanta, David, Miodownik, Mark, Baum, Buzz
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2274883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18369424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000030
_version_ 1782151802933739520
author Basanta, David
Miodownik, Mark
Baum, Buzz
author_facet Basanta, David
Miodownik, Mark
Baum, Buzz
author_sort Basanta, David
collection PubMed
description During embryogenesis, multicellular animals are shaped via cell proliferation, cell rearrangement, and apoptosis. At the end of development, tissue architecture is then maintained through balanced rates of cell proliferation and loss. Here, we take an in silico approach to look for generic systems features of morphogenesis in multicellular animals that arise as a consequence of the evolution of development. Using artificial evolution, we evolved cellular automata-based digital organisms that have distinct embryonic and homeostatic phases of development. Although these evolved organisms use a variety of strategies to maintain their form over time, organisms of different types were all found to rapidly recover from environmental damage in the form of wounds. This regenerative response was most robust in an organism with a stratified tissue-like architecture. An evolutionary analysis revealed that evolution itself contributed to the ability of this organism to maintain its form in the face of genetic and environmental perturbation, confirming the results of previous studies. In addition, the exceptional robustness of this organism to surface injury was found to result from an upward flux of cells, driven in part by cell divisions with a stable niche at the tissue base. Given the general nature of the model, our results lead us to suggest that many of the robust systems properties observed in real organisms, including scar-free wound-healing in well-protected embryos and the layered tissue architecture of regenerating epithelial tissues, may be by-products of the evolution of morphogenesis, rather than the direct result of selection.
format Text
id pubmed-2274883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22748832008-03-28 The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms Basanta, David Miodownik, Mark Baum, Buzz PLoS Comput Biol Research Article During embryogenesis, multicellular animals are shaped via cell proliferation, cell rearrangement, and apoptosis. At the end of development, tissue architecture is then maintained through balanced rates of cell proliferation and loss. Here, we take an in silico approach to look for generic systems features of morphogenesis in multicellular animals that arise as a consequence of the evolution of development. Using artificial evolution, we evolved cellular automata-based digital organisms that have distinct embryonic and homeostatic phases of development. Although these evolved organisms use a variety of strategies to maintain their form over time, organisms of different types were all found to rapidly recover from environmental damage in the form of wounds. This regenerative response was most robust in an organism with a stratified tissue-like architecture. An evolutionary analysis revealed that evolution itself contributed to the ability of this organism to maintain its form in the face of genetic and environmental perturbation, confirming the results of previous studies. In addition, the exceptional robustness of this organism to surface injury was found to result from an upward flux of cells, driven in part by cell divisions with a stable niche at the tissue base. Given the general nature of the model, our results lead us to suggest that many of the robust systems properties observed in real organisms, including scar-free wound-healing in well-protected embryos and the layered tissue architecture of regenerating epithelial tissues, may be by-products of the evolution of morphogenesis, rather than the direct result of selection. Public Library of Science 2008-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2274883/ /pubmed/18369424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000030 Text en Basanta et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Basanta, David
Miodownik, Mark
Baum, Buzz
The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms
title The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms
title_full The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms
title_fullStr The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms
title_short The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms
title_sort evolution of robust development and homeostasis in artificial organisms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2274883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18369424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000030
work_keys_str_mv AT basantadavid theevolutionofrobustdevelopmentandhomeostasisinartificialorganisms
AT miodownikmark theevolutionofrobustdevelopmentandhomeostasisinartificialorganisms
AT baumbuzz theevolutionofrobustdevelopmentandhomeostasisinartificialorganisms
AT basantadavid evolutionofrobustdevelopmentandhomeostasisinartificialorganisms
AT miodownikmark evolutionofrobustdevelopmentandhomeostasisinartificialorganisms
AT baumbuzz evolutionofrobustdevelopmentandhomeostasisinartificialorganisms