Cargando…

Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: A strong family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) confers increased DM risk. This survey analysis determined whether patients who were informed by their doctors of familial DM risk acknowledged that risk and took steps to reduce it. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of the Nationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qureshi, Nadeem, Kai, Joe
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18257922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-37
_version_ 1782151839058231296
author Qureshi, Nadeem
Kai, Joe
author_facet Qureshi, Nadeem
Kai, Joe
author_sort Qureshi, Nadeem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A strong family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) confers increased DM risk. This survey analysis determined whether patients who were informed by their doctors of familial DM risk acknowledged that risk and took steps to reduce it. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of the National Health Styles 2004 mail survey. All non-diabetic participants who responded to the question of whether their doctor had or had not informed them of their familial DM risk (n = 3,323) were compared for their risk-reducing behaviour and attitude to DM risk. RESULTS: Forty-one percent (n = 616) of the question responders that had DM family histories were informed by their doctors of their familial risk; the chance of being informed increased with the number of relatives that had the disease. Members of the informed group were more likely than those in the non-informed group to report lifestyle changes to prevent DM (odds ratio [OR] 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5–5.2) and being tested for DM (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.4–3.6), although no significant improvement occurred in their U.S.-recommended exercise activity (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.1). Overall, informed responders recognised both their familial and personal DM risk; most discussed diabetes with their family (69%), though less so with friends (42%); however, 44% of them still did not consider themselves to be at risk. CONCLUSION: Responders who were informed by their doctors of being at familial DM risk reported greater incidences of lifestyle changes, DM screening, and awareness of risk than non-informed responders. Doctors were more likely to inform patients with stronger DM family histories. Identifying this higher risk group, either in isolation or in combination with other recognised risk factors, offers doctors the opportunity to target limited health promotion resources efficiently for primary DM prevention.
format Text
id pubmed-2275238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22752382008-03-26 Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey Qureshi, Nadeem Kai, Joe BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A strong family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) confers increased DM risk. This survey analysis determined whether patients who were informed by their doctors of familial DM risk acknowledged that risk and took steps to reduce it. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of the National Health Styles 2004 mail survey. All non-diabetic participants who responded to the question of whether their doctor had or had not informed them of their familial DM risk (n = 3,323) were compared for their risk-reducing behaviour and attitude to DM risk. RESULTS: Forty-one percent (n = 616) of the question responders that had DM family histories were informed by their doctors of their familial risk; the chance of being informed increased with the number of relatives that had the disease. Members of the informed group were more likely than those in the non-informed group to report lifestyle changes to prevent DM (odds ratio [OR] 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5–5.2) and being tested for DM (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.4–3.6), although no significant improvement occurred in their U.S.-recommended exercise activity (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.1). Overall, informed responders recognised both their familial and personal DM risk; most discussed diabetes with their family (69%), though less so with friends (42%); however, 44% of them still did not consider themselves to be at risk. CONCLUSION: Responders who were informed by their doctors of being at familial DM risk reported greater incidences of lifestyle changes, DM screening, and awareness of risk than non-informed responders. Doctors were more likely to inform patients with stronger DM family histories. Identifying this higher risk group, either in isolation or in combination with other recognised risk factors, offers doctors the opportunity to target limited health promotion resources efficiently for primary DM prevention. BioMed Central 2008-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2275238/ /pubmed/18257922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-37 Text en Copyright © 2008 Qureshi and Kai; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qureshi, Nadeem
Kai, Joe
Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey
title Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey
title_full Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey
title_short Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey
title_sort informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: how do they respond? a cross-sectional survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18257922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-37
work_keys_str_mv AT qureshinadeem informingpatientsoffamilialdiabetesmellitusriskhowdotheyrespondacrosssectionalsurvey
AT kaijoe informingpatientsoffamilialdiabetesmellitusriskhowdotheyrespondacrosssectionalsurvey