Cargando…

The effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation (E-PES) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is one of the main causes of musculoskeletal disability in the western world. Current available management options provide symptomatic relief (exercise and self-management, medication and surgery) but do not, in general, address the disease process itself....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fary, Robyn E, Carroll, Graeme J, Briffa, Tom G, Gupta, Ritu, Briffa, N Kathryn
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18241355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-18
_version_ 1782151895691821056
author Fary, Robyn E
Carroll, Graeme J
Briffa, Tom G
Gupta, Ritu
Briffa, N Kathryn
author_facet Fary, Robyn E
Carroll, Graeme J
Briffa, Tom G
Gupta, Ritu
Briffa, N Kathryn
author_sort Fary, Robyn E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is one of the main causes of musculoskeletal disability in the western world. Current available management options provide symptomatic relief (exercise and self-management, medication and surgery) but do not, in general, address the disease process itself. Moreover, adverse effects and complications with some of these interventions (medication and surgery) and the presence of co-morbidities commonly restrict their use. There is clearly a need to investigate treatments that are more widely applicable for symptom management and which may also directly address the disease process itself. In two randomised controlled trials of four and 12 weeks duration, pulsed electrical stimulation was shown to be effective in managing the symptoms of OA of the knee. Laboratory and animal studies demonstrate the capacity of externally applied electric and electromagnetic fields to positively affect chondrocyte proliferation and extracellular matrix protein production. This latter evidence provides strong theoretical support for the use of electrical stimulation to maintain and repair cartilage in the clinical setting and highlights its potential as a disease-modifying modality. METHODS/DESIGN: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, repeated measures trial to examine the effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation in providing symptomatic relief for people with OA of the knee over 26 weeks. Seventy people will be recruited and information regarding age, gender, body mass index and medication use will be recorded. The population will be stratified for age, gender and baseline pain levels. Outcome measures will include pain (100 mm VAS and WOMAC 3.1), function (WOMAC 3.1), stiffness (WOMAC 3.1), patient global assessment (100 mm VAS) and quality of life (SF-36). These outcomes will be measured at baseline, four, 16 and 26 weeks. Activity levels will be measured at baseline and 16 weeks using accelerometers and the Human Activity Profile questionnaire. A patient global perceived effect scale (11-point Likert) will be completed at 16 and 26 weeks. DISCUSSION: This paper describes the protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that will contribute to the evidence regarding the use of sub-sensory pulsed electrical stimulation in the management of OA of the knee. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12607000492459.
format Text
id pubmed-2275728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22757282008-03-27 The effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation (E-PES) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial Fary, Robyn E Carroll, Graeme J Briffa, Tom G Gupta, Ritu Briffa, N Kathryn BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is one of the main causes of musculoskeletal disability in the western world. Current available management options provide symptomatic relief (exercise and self-management, medication and surgery) but do not, in general, address the disease process itself. Moreover, adverse effects and complications with some of these interventions (medication and surgery) and the presence of co-morbidities commonly restrict their use. There is clearly a need to investigate treatments that are more widely applicable for symptom management and which may also directly address the disease process itself. In two randomised controlled trials of four and 12 weeks duration, pulsed electrical stimulation was shown to be effective in managing the symptoms of OA of the knee. Laboratory and animal studies demonstrate the capacity of externally applied electric and electromagnetic fields to positively affect chondrocyte proliferation and extracellular matrix protein production. This latter evidence provides strong theoretical support for the use of electrical stimulation to maintain and repair cartilage in the clinical setting and highlights its potential as a disease-modifying modality. METHODS/DESIGN: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, repeated measures trial to examine the effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation in providing symptomatic relief for people with OA of the knee over 26 weeks. Seventy people will be recruited and information regarding age, gender, body mass index and medication use will be recorded. The population will be stratified for age, gender and baseline pain levels. Outcome measures will include pain (100 mm VAS and WOMAC 3.1), function (WOMAC 3.1), stiffness (WOMAC 3.1), patient global assessment (100 mm VAS) and quality of life (SF-36). These outcomes will be measured at baseline, four, 16 and 26 weeks. Activity levels will be measured at baseline and 16 weeks using accelerometers and the Human Activity Profile questionnaire. A patient global perceived effect scale (11-point Likert) will be completed at 16 and 26 weeks. DISCUSSION: This paper describes the protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that will contribute to the evidence regarding the use of sub-sensory pulsed electrical stimulation in the management of OA of the knee. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12607000492459. BioMed Central 2008-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2275728/ /pubmed/18241355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-18 Text en Copyright © 2008 Fary et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Fary, Robyn E
Carroll, Graeme J
Briffa, Tom G
Gupta, Ritu
Briffa, N Kathryn
The effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation (E-PES) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title The effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation (E-PES) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation (E-PES) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation (E-PES) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation (E-PES) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation (E-PES) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation (e-pes) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18241355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-18
work_keys_str_mv AT faryrobyne theeffectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT carrollgraemej theeffectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT briffatomg theeffectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT guptaritu theeffectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT briffankathryn theeffectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT faryrobyne effectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT carrollgraemej effectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT briffatomg effectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT guptaritu effectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT briffankathryn effectivenessofpulsedelectricalstimulationepesinthemanagementofosteoarthritisofthekneeaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial