Cargando…

A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is the second most common chief complaint in North American emergency departments. Data from the U.S. suggest that 2.1% of patients with acute myocardial infarction and 2.3% of patients with unstable angina are misdiagnosed, with slightly higher rates reported in a recent Cana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hess, Erik P, Wells, George A, Jaffe, Allan, Stiell, Ian G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18254973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-8-3
_version_ 1782151899945893888
author Hess, Erik P
Wells, George A
Jaffe, Allan
Stiell, Ian G
author_facet Hess, Erik P
Wells, George A
Jaffe, Allan
Stiell, Ian G
author_sort Hess, Erik P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chest pain is the second most common chief complaint in North American emergency departments. Data from the U.S. suggest that 2.1% of patients with acute myocardial infarction and 2.3% of patients with unstable angina are misdiagnosed, with slightly higher rates reported in a recent Canadian study (4.6% and 6.4%, respectively). Information obtained from the history, 12-lead ECG, and a single set of cardiac enzymes is unable to identify patients who are safe for early discharge with sufficient sensitivity. The 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines for UA/NSTEMI do not identify patients at low risk for adverse cardiac events who can be safely discharged without provocative testing. As a result large numbers of low risk patients are triaged to chest pain observation units and undergo provocative testing, at significant cost to the healthcare system. Clinical decision rules use clinical findings (history, physical exam, test results) to suggest a diagnostic or therapeutic course of action. Currently no methodologically robust clinical decision rule identifies patients safe for early discharge. METHODS/DESIGN: The goal of this study is to derive a clinical decision rule which will allow emergency physicians to accurately identify patients with chest pain who are safe for early discharge. The study will utilize a prospective cohort design. Standardized clinical variables will be collected on all patients at least 25 years of age complaining of chest pain prior to provocative testing. Variables strongly associated with the composite outcome acute myocardial infarction, revascularization, or death will be further analyzed with multivariable analysis to derive the clinical rule. Specific aims are to: i) apply standardized clinical assessments to patients with chest pain, incorporating results of early cardiac testing; ii) determine the inter-observer reliability of the clinical information; iii) determine the statistical association between the clinical findings and the composite outcome; and iv) use multivariable analysis to derive a highly sensitive clinical decision rule to guide triage decisions. DISCUSSION: The study will derive a highly sensitive clinical decision rule to identify low risk patients safe for early discharge. This will improve patient care, lower healthcare costs, and enhance flow in our busy and overcrowded emergency departments.
format Text
id pubmed-2275746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22757462008-03-27 A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology Hess, Erik P Wells, George A Jaffe, Allan Stiell, Ian G BMC Emerg Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Chest pain is the second most common chief complaint in North American emergency departments. Data from the U.S. suggest that 2.1% of patients with acute myocardial infarction and 2.3% of patients with unstable angina are misdiagnosed, with slightly higher rates reported in a recent Canadian study (4.6% and 6.4%, respectively). Information obtained from the history, 12-lead ECG, and a single set of cardiac enzymes is unable to identify patients who are safe for early discharge with sufficient sensitivity. The 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines for UA/NSTEMI do not identify patients at low risk for adverse cardiac events who can be safely discharged without provocative testing. As a result large numbers of low risk patients are triaged to chest pain observation units and undergo provocative testing, at significant cost to the healthcare system. Clinical decision rules use clinical findings (history, physical exam, test results) to suggest a diagnostic or therapeutic course of action. Currently no methodologically robust clinical decision rule identifies patients safe for early discharge. METHODS/DESIGN: The goal of this study is to derive a clinical decision rule which will allow emergency physicians to accurately identify patients with chest pain who are safe for early discharge. The study will utilize a prospective cohort design. Standardized clinical variables will be collected on all patients at least 25 years of age complaining of chest pain prior to provocative testing. Variables strongly associated with the composite outcome acute myocardial infarction, revascularization, or death will be further analyzed with multivariable analysis to derive the clinical rule. Specific aims are to: i) apply standardized clinical assessments to patients with chest pain, incorporating results of early cardiac testing; ii) determine the inter-observer reliability of the clinical information; iii) determine the statistical association between the clinical findings and the composite outcome; and iv) use multivariable analysis to derive a highly sensitive clinical decision rule to guide triage decisions. DISCUSSION: The study will derive a highly sensitive clinical decision rule to identify low risk patients safe for early discharge. This will improve patient care, lower healthcare costs, and enhance flow in our busy and overcrowded emergency departments. BioMed Central 2008-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2275746/ /pubmed/18254973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-8-3 Text en Copyright © 2008 Hess et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hess, Erik P
Wells, George A
Jaffe, Allan
Stiell, Ian G
A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology
title A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology
title_full A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology
title_fullStr A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology
title_full_unstemmed A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology
title_short A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology
title_sort study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2275746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18254973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-8-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hesserikp astudytoderiveaclinicaldecisionrulefortriageofemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpaindesignandmethodology
AT wellsgeorgea astudytoderiveaclinicaldecisionrulefortriageofemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpaindesignandmethodology
AT jaffeallan astudytoderiveaclinicaldecisionrulefortriageofemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpaindesignandmethodology
AT stielliang astudytoderiveaclinicaldecisionrulefortriageofemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpaindesignandmethodology
AT hesserikp studytoderiveaclinicaldecisionrulefortriageofemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpaindesignandmethodology
AT wellsgeorgea studytoderiveaclinicaldecisionrulefortriageofemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpaindesignandmethodology
AT jaffeallan studytoderiveaclinicaldecisionrulefortriageofemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpaindesignandmethodology
AT stielliang studytoderiveaclinicaldecisionrulefortriageofemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpaindesignandmethodology