Cargando…

Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the WHO classification in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML-97 protocol

We reviewed and categorized 638 of 809 patients who were registered in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-97 protocol using morphological means. Patients with the M3 subtype were excluded from the study group. According to the WHO classification, 171 patients (26.8%) h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wakui, Moe, Kuriyama, Kazutaka, Miyazaki, Yasushi, Hata, Tomoko, Taniwaki, Masafumi, Ohtake, Shigeki, Sakamaki, Hisashi, Miyawaki, Shuichi, Naoe, Tomoki, Ohno, Ryuzo, Tomonaga, Masao
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2276241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18256787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12185-008-0025-3
_version_ 1782151986672566272
author Wakui, Moe
Kuriyama, Kazutaka
Miyazaki, Yasushi
Hata, Tomoko
Taniwaki, Masafumi
Ohtake, Shigeki
Sakamaki, Hisashi
Miyawaki, Shuichi
Naoe, Tomoki
Ohno, Ryuzo
Tomonaga, Masao
author_facet Wakui, Moe
Kuriyama, Kazutaka
Miyazaki, Yasushi
Hata, Tomoko
Taniwaki, Masafumi
Ohtake, Shigeki
Sakamaki, Hisashi
Miyawaki, Shuichi
Naoe, Tomoki
Ohno, Ryuzo
Tomonaga, Masao
author_sort Wakui, Moe
collection PubMed
description We reviewed and categorized 638 of 809 patients who were registered in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-97 protocol using morphological means. Patients with the M3 subtype were excluded from the study group. According to the WHO classification, 171 patients (26.8%) had AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities, 133 (20.8%) had AML with multilineage dysplasia (MLD), 331 (51.9%) had AML not otherwise categorized, and 3 (0.5%) had acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage. The platelet count was higher and the rate of myeloperoxidase (MPO)-positive blasts was lower in AML with MLD than in the other WHO categories. The outcome was significantly better in patients with high (≥50%) than with low (<50%) ratios of MPO-positive blasts (P < 0.01). The 5-year survival rates for patients with favorable, intermediate, and adverse karyotypes were 63.4, 39.1, and 0.0%, respectively, and 35.5% for those with 11q23 abnormalities (P < 0.0001). Overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between nine patients with t(9;11) and 23 with other 11q23 abnormalities (P = 0.22). Our results confirmed that the cytogenetic profile, MLD phenotype, and MPO-positivity of blasts are associated with survival in patients with AML, and showed that each category had the characteristics of the WHO classification such as incidence, clinical features, and OS.
format Text
id pubmed-2276241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22762412008-03-28 Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the WHO classification in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML-97 protocol Wakui, Moe Kuriyama, Kazutaka Miyazaki, Yasushi Hata, Tomoko Taniwaki, Masafumi Ohtake, Shigeki Sakamaki, Hisashi Miyawaki, Shuichi Naoe, Tomoki Ohno, Ryuzo Tomonaga, Masao Int J Hematol Original Article We reviewed and categorized 638 of 809 patients who were registered in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-97 protocol using morphological means. Patients with the M3 subtype were excluded from the study group. According to the WHO classification, 171 patients (26.8%) had AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities, 133 (20.8%) had AML with multilineage dysplasia (MLD), 331 (51.9%) had AML not otherwise categorized, and 3 (0.5%) had acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage. The platelet count was higher and the rate of myeloperoxidase (MPO)-positive blasts was lower in AML with MLD than in the other WHO categories. The outcome was significantly better in patients with high (≥50%) than with low (<50%) ratios of MPO-positive blasts (P < 0.01). The 5-year survival rates for patients with favorable, intermediate, and adverse karyotypes were 63.4, 39.1, and 0.0%, respectively, and 35.5% for those with 11q23 abnormalities (P < 0.0001). Overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between nine patients with t(9;11) and 23 with other 11q23 abnormalities (P = 0.22). Our results confirmed that the cytogenetic profile, MLD phenotype, and MPO-positivity of blasts are associated with survival in patients with AML, and showed that each category had the characteristics of the WHO classification such as incidence, clinical features, and OS. Springer Japan 2008-02-07 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2276241/ /pubmed/18256787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12185-008-0025-3 Text en © The Japanese Society of Hematology 2008
spellingShingle Original Article
Wakui, Moe
Kuriyama, Kazutaka
Miyazaki, Yasushi
Hata, Tomoko
Taniwaki, Masafumi
Ohtake, Shigeki
Sakamaki, Hisashi
Miyawaki, Shuichi
Naoe, Tomoki
Ohno, Ryuzo
Tomonaga, Masao
Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the WHO classification in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML-97 protocol
title Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the WHO classification in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML-97 protocol
title_full Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the WHO classification in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML-97 protocol
title_fullStr Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the WHO classification in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML-97 protocol
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the WHO classification in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML-97 protocol
title_short Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the WHO classification in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML-97 protocol
title_sort diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the who classification in the japan adult leukemia study group aml-97 protocol
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2276241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18256787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12185-008-0025-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wakuimoe diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT kuriyamakazutaka diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT miyazakiyasushi diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT hatatomoko diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT taniwakimasafumi diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT ohtakeshigeki diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT sakamakihisashi diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT miyawakishuichi diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT naoetomoki diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT ohnoryuzo diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol
AT tomonagamasao diagnosisofacutemyeloidleukemiaaccordingtothewhoclassificationinthejapanadultleukemiastudygroupaml97protocol