Cargando…
The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis
Recent studies have emphasized the value of including structural information into the topological analysis of protein networks. Here, we utilized structural information to investigate the role of intrinsic disorder in these networks. Hub proteins tend to be more disordered than other proteins (i.e....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2290937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18364713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.16 |
_version_ | 1782152401524883456 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Philip M Sboner, Andrea Xia, Yu Gerstein, Mark |
author_facet | Kim, Philip M Sboner, Andrea Xia, Yu Gerstein, Mark |
author_sort | Kim, Philip M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent studies have emphasized the value of including structural information into the topological analysis of protein networks. Here, we utilized structural information to investigate the role of intrinsic disorder in these networks. Hub proteins tend to be more disordered than other proteins (i.e. the proteome average); however, we find this only true for those with one or two binding interfaces (‘single'-interface hubs). In contrast, the distribution of disordered residues in multi-interface hubs is indistinguishable from the overall proteome. Surprisingly, we find that the binding interfaces in single-interface hubs are highly structured, as is the case for multi-interface hubs. However, the binding partners of single-interface hubs tend to have a higher level of disorder than the proteome average, suggesting that their binding promiscuity is related to the disorder of their binding partners. In turn, the higher level of disorder of single-interface hubs can be partly explained by their tendency to bind to each other in a cascade. A good illustration of this trend can be found in signaling pathways and, more specifically, in kinase cascades. Finally, our findings have implications for the current controversy related to party and date-hubs. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2290937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22909372008-04-10 The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis Kim, Philip M Sboner, Andrea Xia, Yu Gerstein, Mark Mol Syst Biol Report Recent studies have emphasized the value of including structural information into the topological analysis of protein networks. Here, we utilized structural information to investigate the role of intrinsic disorder in these networks. Hub proteins tend to be more disordered than other proteins (i.e. the proteome average); however, we find this only true for those with one or two binding interfaces (‘single'-interface hubs). In contrast, the distribution of disordered residues in multi-interface hubs is indistinguishable from the overall proteome. Surprisingly, we find that the binding interfaces in single-interface hubs are highly structured, as is the case for multi-interface hubs. However, the binding partners of single-interface hubs tend to have a higher level of disorder than the proteome average, suggesting that their binding promiscuity is related to the disorder of their binding partners. In turn, the higher level of disorder of single-interface hubs can be partly explained by their tendency to bind to each other in a cascade. A good illustration of this trend can be found in signaling pathways and, more specifically, in kinase cascades. Finally, our findings have implications for the current controversy related to party and date-hubs. Nature Publishing Group 2008-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2290937/ /pubmed/18364713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.16 Text en Copyright © 2008, EMBO and Nature Publishing Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Creation of derivative works is permitted but the resulting work may be distributed only under the same or similar licence to this one. This licence does not permit commercial exploitation without specific permission. |
spellingShingle | Report Kim, Philip M Sboner, Andrea Xia, Yu Gerstein, Mark The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis |
title | The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis |
title_full | The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis |
title_fullStr | The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis |
title_short | The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis |
title_sort | role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis |
topic | Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2290937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18364713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimphilipm theroleofdisorderininteractionnetworksastructuralanalysis AT sbonerandrea theroleofdisorderininteractionnetworksastructuralanalysis AT xiayu theroleofdisorderininteractionnetworksastructuralanalysis AT gersteinmark theroleofdisorderininteractionnetworksastructuralanalysis AT kimphilipm roleofdisorderininteractionnetworksastructuralanalysis AT sbonerandrea roleofdisorderininteractionnetworksastructuralanalysis AT xiayu roleofdisorderininteractionnetworksastructuralanalysis AT gersteinmark roleofdisorderininteractionnetworksastructuralanalysis |