Cargando…

Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out?

BACKGROUND: The term blue skies research implies a freedom to carry out flexible, curiosity-driven research that leads to outcomes not envisaged at the outset. This research often challenges accepted thinking and introduces new fields of study. Science policy in the UK has given growing support for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Linden, Belinda
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18312612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-3-3
_version_ 1782152469952856064
author Linden, Belinda
author_facet Linden, Belinda
author_sort Linden, Belinda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The term blue skies research implies a freedom to carry out flexible, curiosity-driven research that leads to outcomes not envisaged at the outset. This research often challenges accepted thinking and introduces new fields of study. Science policy in the UK has given growing support for short-term goal-oriented scientific research projects, with pressure being applied on researchers to demonstrate the future application of their work. These policies carry the risk of restricting freedom, curbing research direction, and stifling rather than stimulating the creativity needed for scientific discovery. METHODS: This study tracks the tortuous routes that led to three major discoveries in cardiology. It then investigates the constraints in current research, and opportunities that may be lost with existing funding processes, by interviewing selected scientists and fund providers for their views on curiosity-driven research and the freedom needed to allow science to flourish. The transcripts were analysed using a grounded theory approach to gather recurrent themes from the interviews. RESULTS: The results from these interviews suggest that scientists often cannot predict the future applications of research. Constraints such as lack of scientific freedom, and a narrow focus on relevance and accountability were believed to stifle the discovery process. Although it was acknowledged that some research projects do need a clear and measurable framework, the interviewees saw a need for inquisitive, blue skies research to be managed in a different way. They provided examples of situations where money allocated to 'safe' funding was used for more innovative research. CONCLUSION: This sample of key UK scientists and grant providers acknowledge the importance of basic blue skies research. Yet the current evaluation process often requires that scientists predict their likely findings and estimate short-term impact, which does not permit freedom of research direction. There is a vital need for prominent scientists and for universities to help the media, the public, and policy makers to understand the importance of innovative thought along with the need for scientists to have the freedom to challenge accepted thinking. Encouraging an avenue for blue skies research could have immense influence over future scientific discoveries.
format Text
id pubmed-2292148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22921482008-04-11 Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out? Linden, Belinda J Biomed Discov Collab Research BACKGROUND: The term blue skies research implies a freedom to carry out flexible, curiosity-driven research that leads to outcomes not envisaged at the outset. This research often challenges accepted thinking and introduces new fields of study. Science policy in the UK has given growing support for short-term goal-oriented scientific research projects, with pressure being applied on researchers to demonstrate the future application of their work. These policies carry the risk of restricting freedom, curbing research direction, and stifling rather than stimulating the creativity needed for scientific discovery. METHODS: This study tracks the tortuous routes that led to three major discoveries in cardiology. It then investigates the constraints in current research, and opportunities that may be lost with existing funding processes, by interviewing selected scientists and fund providers for their views on curiosity-driven research and the freedom needed to allow science to flourish. The transcripts were analysed using a grounded theory approach to gather recurrent themes from the interviews. RESULTS: The results from these interviews suggest that scientists often cannot predict the future applications of research. Constraints such as lack of scientific freedom, and a narrow focus on relevance and accountability were believed to stifle the discovery process. Although it was acknowledged that some research projects do need a clear and measurable framework, the interviewees saw a need for inquisitive, blue skies research to be managed in a different way. They provided examples of situations where money allocated to 'safe' funding was used for more innovative research. CONCLUSION: This sample of key UK scientists and grant providers acknowledge the importance of basic blue skies research. Yet the current evaluation process often requires that scientists predict their likely findings and estimate short-term impact, which does not permit freedom of research direction. There is a vital need for prominent scientists and for universities to help the media, the public, and policy makers to understand the importance of innovative thought along with the need for scientists to have the freedom to challenge accepted thinking. Encouraging an avenue for blue skies research could have immense influence over future scientific discoveries. BioMed Central 2008-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2292148/ /pubmed/18312612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-3-3 Text en Copyright © 2008 Linden; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Linden, Belinda
Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out?
title Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out?
title_full Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out?
title_fullStr Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out?
title_full_unstemmed Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out?
title_short Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out?
title_sort basic blue skies research in the uk: are we losing out?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18312612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-3-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lindenbelinda basicblueskiesresearchintheukarewelosingout