Cargando…
Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation
BACKGROUND: In 2000, the national cancer plan for England created 34 cancer networks, new organisational structures to coordinate services across populations varying between a half and three million people. We investigated the availability of data sets reflecting measures of structure, process and o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18304315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-45 |
_version_ | 1782152475075149824 |
---|---|
author | McCarthy, Mark Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Arturo Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris Khachatryan, Artak Coleman, Michel P Rachet, Bernard |
author_facet | McCarthy, Mark Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Arturo Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris Khachatryan, Artak Coleman, Michel P Rachet, Bernard |
author_sort | McCarthy, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2000, the national cancer plan for England created 34 cancer networks, new organisational structures to coordinate services across populations varying between a half and three million people. We investigated the availability of data sets reflecting measures of structure, process and outcome that could be used to support network management. METHODS: We investigated the properties of national data sets relating to four common cancers – breast, colorectal, lung and prostate. We reviewed the availability and completeness of these data sets, identified leading items within each set and put them into tables of the 34 cancer networks. We also investigated methods of presentation. RESULTS: The Acute Hospitals Portfolio and the Cancer Standards Peer Review recorded structural characteristics at hospital and cancer service level. Process measures included Hospital Episode Statistics, recording admissions, and Hospital Waiting-List data. Patient outcome measures included the National Survey of Patient Satisfaction for cancer, and cancer survival, drawn from cancer registration. Data were drawn together to provide an exemplar indicator set a single network, and methods of graphical presentation were considered. CONCLUSION: While not as yet used together in practice, comparative indicators are available within the National Health Service in England for use in performance assessment by cancer networks. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2292168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22921682008-04-11 Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation McCarthy, Mark Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Arturo Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris Khachatryan, Artak Coleman, Michel P Rachet, Bernard BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2000, the national cancer plan for England created 34 cancer networks, new organisational structures to coordinate services across populations varying between a half and three million people. We investigated the availability of data sets reflecting measures of structure, process and outcome that could be used to support network management. METHODS: We investigated the properties of national data sets relating to four common cancers – breast, colorectal, lung and prostate. We reviewed the availability and completeness of these data sets, identified leading items within each set and put them into tables of the 34 cancer networks. We also investigated methods of presentation. RESULTS: The Acute Hospitals Portfolio and the Cancer Standards Peer Review recorded structural characteristics at hospital and cancer service level. Process measures included Hospital Episode Statistics, recording admissions, and Hospital Waiting-List data. Patient outcome measures included the National Survey of Patient Satisfaction for cancer, and cancer survival, drawn from cancer registration. Data were drawn together to provide an exemplar indicator set a single network, and methods of graphical presentation were considered. CONCLUSION: While not as yet used together in practice, comparative indicators are available within the National Health Service in England for use in performance assessment by cancer networks. BioMed Central 2008-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2292168/ /pubmed/18304315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-45 Text en Copyright © 2008 McCarthy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McCarthy, Mark Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Arturo Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris Khachatryan, Artak Coleman, Michel P Rachet, Bernard Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation |
title | Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation |
title_full | Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation |
title_fullStr | Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation |
title_short | Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation |
title_sort | comparative indicators for cancer network management in england: availability, characteristics and presentation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18304315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-45 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccarthymark comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation AT gonzalezizquierdoarturo comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation AT sherlawjohnsonchris comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation AT khachatryanartak comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation AT colemanmichelp comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation AT rachetbernard comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation |