Cargando…

Conversant or clueless? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia

BACKGROUND: A survey of Western Australia's general practitioners' (GPs') knowledge and practices relating to genital chlamydia infection was conducted in mid-2005, prior to a multi-media campaign which encouraged 15–24 year olds to seek chlamydia testing through their general practit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Temple-Smith, Meredith J, Mak, Donna, Watson, Jan, Bastian, Lisa, Smith, Anthony, Pitts, Marian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18307819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-9-17
_version_ 1782152480266649600
author Temple-Smith, Meredith J
Mak, Donna
Watson, Jan
Bastian, Lisa
Smith, Anthony
Pitts, Marian
author_facet Temple-Smith, Meredith J
Mak, Donna
Watson, Jan
Bastian, Lisa
Smith, Anthony
Pitts, Marian
author_sort Temple-Smith, Meredith J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A survey of Western Australia's general practitioners' (GPs') knowledge and practices relating to genital chlamydia infection was conducted in mid-2005, prior to a multi-media campaign which encouraged 15–24 year olds to seek chlamydia testing through their general practitioner (GP). The survey aimed to raise GPs' awareness of chlamydia in preparation for the campaign and to establish a baseline measure of their chlamydia-related knowledge and practices. METHODS: All 2038 GPs registered on the Australian Medical Publishing Company's database as practising in Western Australia were sent a survey which covered clinical features of chlamydia, investigations, treatment and public health issues; 576 (29%) responded. RESULTS: Most GPs were aware of chlamydia being common in the 20–24 year old age group, but less than half were aware that it is common in 15–19 year olds. GPs missed many opportunities for chlamydia testing in patients likely to be at risk of STIs, largely because they thought the patient would be embarrassed. It is of concern that public health responsibilities in relation to chlamydia, ie notification and contact tracing, were not undertaken by all GPs. CONCLUSION: Australia is currently piloting chlamydia screening. For this to be successful, GPs will need to maintain current knowledge and clinical suspicion about chlamydia, and be comfortable in asking and receiving information about sexual behaviours. Only then will GPs have a significant impact on curbing Australia's ever-increasing rates of chlamydia.
format Text
id pubmed-2292189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22921892008-04-11 Conversant or clueless? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia Temple-Smith, Meredith J Mak, Donna Watson, Jan Bastian, Lisa Smith, Anthony Pitts, Marian BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: A survey of Western Australia's general practitioners' (GPs') knowledge and practices relating to genital chlamydia infection was conducted in mid-2005, prior to a multi-media campaign which encouraged 15–24 year olds to seek chlamydia testing through their general practitioner (GP). The survey aimed to raise GPs' awareness of chlamydia in preparation for the campaign and to establish a baseline measure of their chlamydia-related knowledge and practices. METHODS: All 2038 GPs registered on the Australian Medical Publishing Company's database as practising in Western Australia were sent a survey which covered clinical features of chlamydia, investigations, treatment and public health issues; 576 (29%) responded. RESULTS: Most GPs were aware of chlamydia being common in the 20–24 year old age group, but less than half were aware that it is common in 15–19 year olds. GPs missed many opportunities for chlamydia testing in patients likely to be at risk of STIs, largely because they thought the patient would be embarrassed. It is of concern that public health responsibilities in relation to chlamydia, ie notification and contact tracing, were not undertaken by all GPs. CONCLUSION: Australia is currently piloting chlamydia screening. For this to be successful, GPs will need to maintain current knowledge and clinical suspicion about chlamydia, and be comfortable in asking and receiving information about sexual behaviours. Only then will GPs have a significant impact on curbing Australia's ever-increasing rates of chlamydia. BioMed Central 2008-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2292189/ /pubmed/18307819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-9-17 Text en Copyright © 2008 Temple-Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Temple-Smith, Meredith J
Mak, Donna
Watson, Jan
Bastian, Lisa
Smith, Anthony
Pitts, Marian
Conversant or clueless? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia
title Conversant or clueless? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia
title_full Conversant or clueless? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia
title_fullStr Conversant or clueless? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia
title_full_unstemmed Conversant or clueless? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia
title_short Conversant or clueless? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia
title_sort conversant or clueless? chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in western australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18307819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-9-17
work_keys_str_mv AT templesmithmeredithj conversantorcluelesschlamydiarelatedknowledgeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinwesternaustralia
AT makdonna conversantorcluelesschlamydiarelatedknowledgeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinwesternaustralia
AT watsonjan conversantorcluelesschlamydiarelatedknowledgeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinwesternaustralia
AT bastianlisa conversantorcluelesschlamydiarelatedknowledgeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinwesternaustralia
AT smithanthony conversantorcluelesschlamydiarelatedknowledgeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinwesternaustralia
AT pittsmarian conversantorcluelesschlamydiarelatedknowledgeandpracticeofgeneralpractitionersinwesternaustralia