Cargando…
A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios
BACKGROUND: It is usually preferable to model and estimate prevalence ratios instead of odds ratios in cross-sectional studies when diseases or injuries are not rare. Problems with existing methods of modeling prevalence ratios include lack of convergence, overestimated standard errors, and extrapol...
Autores principales: | Petersen, Martin R, Deddens, James A |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18307814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A comparison of two methods for estimating odds ratios: Results from the National Health Survey
por: Bakhshi, Enayatollah, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Comparison of Prevalence- and Smoking Impact Ratio-Based Methods of Estimating Smoking-Attributable Fractions of Deaths
por: Kong, Kyoung Ae, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Modifiers of exposure-response estimates for lung cancer among miners exposed to radon progeny.
por: Hornung, R W, et al.
Publicado: (1995) -
Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods for prevalence estimation under misclassification
por: Flor, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of machine learning methods for estimating case fatality ratios: An Ebola outbreak simulation study
por: Forna, Alpha, et al.
Publicado: (2021)