Cargando…

A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods

BACKGROUND: The need for economical rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is increasing in developing countries. Implementation of the two currently approved economical intradermal (ID) vaccine regimens is restricted due to confusion over different vaccines, regimens and dosages, lack of confidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warrell, Mary J., Riddell, Anna, Yu, Ly-Mee, Phipps, Judith, Diggle, Linda, Bourhy, Hervé, Deeks, Jonathan J., Fooks, Anthony R., Audry, Laurent, Brookes, Sharon M., Meslin, François-Xavier, Moxon, Richard, Pollard, Andrew J., Warrell, David A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18431444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000224
_version_ 1782152494580760576
author Warrell, Mary J.
Riddell, Anna
Yu, Ly-Mee
Phipps, Judith
Diggle, Linda
Bourhy, Hervé
Deeks, Jonathan J.
Fooks, Anthony R.
Audry, Laurent
Brookes, Sharon M.
Meslin, François-Xavier
Moxon, Richard
Pollard, Andrew J.
Warrell, David A.
author_facet Warrell, Mary J.
Riddell, Anna
Yu, Ly-Mee
Phipps, Judith
Diggle, Linda
Bourhy, Hervé
Deeks, Jonathan J.
Fooks, Anthony R.
Audry, Laurent
Brookes, Sharon M.
Meslin, François-Xavier
Moxon, Richard
Pollard, Andrew J.
Warrell, David A.
author_sort Warrell, Mary J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The need for economical rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is increasing in developing countries. Implementation of the two currently approved economical intradermal (ID) vaccine regimens is restricted due to confusion over different vaccines, regimens and dosages, lack of confidence in intradermal technique, and pharmaceutical regulations. We therefore compared a simplified 4-site economical PEP regimen with standard methods. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-four volunteers were randomly allocated to a single blind controlled trial. Each received purified vero cell rabies vaccine by one of four PEP regimens: the currently accepted 2-site ID; the 8-site regimen using 0.05 ml per ID site; a new 4-site ID regimen (on day 0, approximately 0.1 ml at 4 ID sites, using the whole 0.5 ml ampoule of vaccine; on day 7, 0.1 ml ID at 2 sites and at one site on days 28 and 90); or the standard 5-dose intramuscular regimen. All ID regimens required the same total amount of vaccine, 60% less than the intramuscular method. Neutralising antibody responses were measured five times over a year in 229 people, for whom complete data were available. FINDINGS: All ID regimens showed similar immunogenicity. The intramuscular regimen gave the lowest geometric mean antibody titres. Using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test, some sera had unexpectedly high antibody levels that were not attributable to previous vaccination. The results were confirmed using the fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation method. CONCLUSIONS: This 4-site PEP regimen proved as immunogenic as current regimens, and has the advantages of requiring fewer clinic visits, being more practicable, and having a wider margin of safety, especially in inexperienced hands, than the 2-site regimen. It is more convenient than the 8-site method, and can be used economically with vaccines formulated in 1.0 or 0.5 ml ampoules. The 4-site regimen now meets all requirements of immunogenicity for PEP and can be introduced without further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 30087513
format Text
id pubmed-2292256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22922562008-04-23 A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods Warrell, Mary J. Riddell, Anna Yu, Ly-Mee Phipps, Judith Diggle, Linda Bourhy, Hervé Deeks, Jonathan J. Fooks, Anthony R. Audry, Laurent Brookes, Sharon M. Meslin, François-Xavier Moxon, Richard Pollard, Andrew J. Warrell, David A. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The need for economical rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is increasing in developing countries. Implementation of the two currently approved economical intradermal (ID) vaccine regimens is restricted due to confusion over different vaccines, regimens and dosages, lack of confidence in intradermal technique, and pharmaceutical regulations. We therefore compared a simplified 4-site economical PEP regimen with standard methods. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-four volunteers were randomly allocated to a single blind controlled trial. Each received purified vero cell rabies vaccine by one of four PEP regimens: the currently accepted 2-site ID; the 8-site regimen using 0.05 ml per ID site; a new 4-site ID regimen (on day 0, approximately 0.1 ml at 4 ID sites, using the whole 0.5 ml ampoule of vaccine; on day 7, 0.1 ml ID at 2 sites and at one site on days 28 and 90); or the standard 5-dose intramuscular regimen. All ID regimens required the same total amount of vaccine, 60% less than the intramuscular method. Neutralising antibody responses were measured five times over a year in 229 people, for whom complete data were available. FINDINGS: All ID regimens showed similar immunogenicity. The intramuscular regimen gave the lowest geometric mean antibody titres. Using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test, some sera had unexpectedly high antibody levels that were not attributable to previous vaccination. The results were confirmed using the fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation method. CONCLUSIONS: This 4-site PEP regimen proved as immunogenic as current regimens, and has the advantages of requiring fewer clinic visits, being more practicable, and having a wider margin of safety, especially in inexperienced hands, than the 2-site regimen. It is more convenient than the 8-site method, and can be used economically with vaccines formulated in 1.0 or 0.5 ml ampoules. The 4-site regimen now meets all requirements of immunogenicity for PEP and can be introduced without further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 30087513 Public Library of Science 2008-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2292256/ /pubmed/18431444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000224 Text en Warrell et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Warrell, Mary J.
Riddell, Anna
Yu, Ly-Mee
Phipps, Judith
Diggle, Linda
Bourhy, Hervé
Deeks, Jonathan J.
Fooks, Anthony R.
Audry, Laurent
Brookes, Sharon M.
Meslin, François-Xavier
Moxon, Richard
Pollard, Andrew J.
Warrell, David A.
A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods
title A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods
title_full A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods
title_fullStr A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods
title_full_unstemmed A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods
title_short A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods
title_sort simplified 4-site economical intradermal post-exposure rabies vaccine regimen: a randomised controlled comparison with standard methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18431444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000224
work_keys_str_mv AT warrellmaryj asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT riddellanna asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT yulymee asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT phippsjudith asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT digglelinda asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT bourhyherve asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT deeksjonathanj asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT fooksanthonyr asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT audrylaurent asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT brookessharonm asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT meslinfrancoisxavier asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT moxonrichard asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT pollardandrewj asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT warrelldavida asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT warrellmaryj simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT riddellanna simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT yulymee simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT phippsjudith simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT digglelinda simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT bourhyherve simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT deeksjonathanj simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT fooksanthonyr simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT audrylaurent simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT brookessharonm simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT meslinfrancoisxavier simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT moxonrichard simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT pollardandrewj simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods
AT warrelldavida simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods