Cargando…
A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods
BACKGROUND: The need for economical rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is increasing in developing countries. Implementation of the two currently approved economical intradermal (ID) vaccine regimens is restricted due to confusion over different vaccines, regimens and dosages, lack of confidence...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18431444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000224 |
_version_ | 1782152494580760576 |
---|---|
author | Warrell, Mary J. Riddell, Anna Yu, Ly-Mee Phipps, Judith Diggle, Linda Bourhy, Hervé Deeks, Jonathan J. Fooks, Anthony R. Audry, Laurent Brookes, Sharon M. Meslin, François-Xavier Moxon, Richard Pollard, Andrew J. Warrell, David A. |
author_facet | Warrell, Mary J. Riddell, Anna Yu, Ly-Mee Phipps, Judith Diggle, Linda Bourhy, Hervé Deeks, Jonathan J. Fooks, Anthony R. Audry, Laurent Brookes, Sharon M. Meslin, François-Xavier Moxon, Richard Pollard, Andrew J. Warrell, David A. |
author_sort | Warrell, Mary J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The need for economical rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is increasing in developing countries. Implementation of the two currently approved economical intradermal (ID) vaccine regimens is restricted due to confusion over different vaccines, regimens and dosages, lack of confidence in intradermal technique, and pharmaceutical regulations. We therefore compared a simplified 4-site economical PEP regimen with standard methods. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-four volunteers were randomly allocated to a single blind controlled trial. Each received purified vero cell rabies vaccine by one of four PEP regimens: the currently accepted 2-site ID; the 8-site regimen using 0.05 ml per ID site; a new 4-site ID regimen (on day 0, approximately 0.1 ml at 4 ID sites, using the whole 0.5 ml ampoule of vaccine; on day 7, 0.1 ml ID at 2 sites and at one site on days 28 and 90); or the standard 5-dose intramuscular regimen. All ID regimens required the same total amount of vaccine, 60% less than the intramuscular method. Neutralising antibody responses were measured five times over a year in 229 people, for whom complete data were available. FINDINGS: All ID regimens showed similar immunogenicity. The intramuscular regimen gave the lowest geometric mean antibody titres. Using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test, some sera had unexpectedly high antibody levels that were not attributable to previous vaccination. The results were confirmed using the fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation method. CONCLUSIONS: This 4-site PEP regimen proved as immunogenic as current regimens, and has the advantages of requiring fewer clinic visits, being more practicable, and having a wider margin of safety, especially in inexperienced hands, than the 2-site regimen. It is more convenient than the 8-site method, and can be used economically with vaccines formulated in 1.0 or 0.5 ml ampoules. The 4-site regimen now meets all requirements of immunogenicity for PEP and can be introduced without further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 30087513 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2292256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22922562008-04-23 A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods Warrell, Mary J. Riddell, Anna Yu, Ly-Mee Phipps, Judith Diggle, Linda Bourhy, Hervé Deeks, Jonathan J. Fooks, Anthony R. Audry, Laurent Brookes, Sharon M. Meslin, François-Xavier Moxon, Richard Pollard, Andrew J. Warrell, David A. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The need for economical rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is increasing in developing countries. Implementation of the two currently approved economical intradermal (ID) vaccine regimens is restricted due to confusion over different vaccines, regimens and dosages, lack of confidence in intradermal technique, and pharmaceutical regulations. We therefore compared a simplified 4-site economical PEP regimen with standard methods. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-four volunteers were randomly allocated to a single blind controlled trial. Each received purified vero cell rabies vaccine by one of four PEP regimens: the currently accepted 2-site ID; the 8-site regimen using 0.05 ml per ID site; a new 4-site ID regimen (on day 0, approximately 0.1 ml at 4 ID sites, using the whole 0.5 ml ampoule of vaccine; on day 7, 0.1 ml ID at 2 sites and at one site on days 28 and 90); or the standard 5-dose intramuscular regimen. All ID regimens required the same total amount of vaccine, 60% less than the intramuscular method. Neutralising antibody responses were measured five times over a year in 229 people, for whom complete data were available. FINDINGS: All ID regimens showed similar immunogenicity. The intramuscular regimen gave the lowest geometric mean antibody titres. Using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test, some sera had unexpectedly high antibody levels that were not attributable to previous vaccination. The results were confirmed using the fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation method. CONCLUSIONS: This 4-site PEP regimen proved as immunogenic as current regimens, and has the advantages of requiring fewer clinic visits, being more practicable, and having a wider margin of safety, especially in inexperienced hands, than the 2-site regimen. It is more convenient than the 8-site method, and can be used economically with vaccines formulated in 1.0 or 0.5 ml ampoules. The 4-site regimen now meets all requirements of immunogenicity for PEP and can be introduced without further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 30087513 Public Library of Science 2008-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2292256/ /pubmed/18431444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000224 Text en Warrell et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Warrell, Mary J. Riddell, Anna Yu, Ly-Mee Phipps, Judith Diggle, Linda Bourhy, Hervé Deeks, Jonathan J. Fooks, Anthony R. Audry, Laurent Brookes, Sharon M. Meslin, François-Xavier Moxon, Richard Pollard, Andrew J. Warrell, David A. A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods |
title | A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods |
title_full | A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods |
title_fullStr | A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods |
title_short | A Simplified 4-Site Economical Intradermal Post-Exposure Rabies Vaccine Regimen: A Randomised Controlled Comparison with Standard Methods |
title_sort | simplified 4-site economical intradermal post-exposure rabies vaccine regimen: a randomised controlled comparison with standard methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18431444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warrellmaryj asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT riddellanna asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT yulymee asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT phippsjudith asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT digglelinda asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT bourhyherve asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT deeksjonathanj asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT fooksanthonyr asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT audrylaurent asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT brookessharonm asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT meslinfrancoisxavier asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT moxonrichard asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT pollardandrewj asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT warrelldavida asimplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT warrellmaryj simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT riddellanna simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT yulymee simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT phippsjudith simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT digglelinda simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT bourhyherve simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT deeksjonathanj simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT fooksanthonyr simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT audrylaurent simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT brookessharonm simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT meslinfrancoisxavier simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT moxonrichard simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT pollardandrewj simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods AT warrelldavida simplified4siteeconomicalintradermalpostexposurerabiesvaccineregimenarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonwithstandardmethods |