Cargando…

Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?

BACKGROUND: Dissociated and associated phoria are measures of latent strabismus under artificial viewing conditions. We examined to what extent dissociated and associated phoria predict the “comfortable prism”, i.e. the prism that appears most comfortable under natural viewing conditions. METHODS: F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otto, Joanna M. N., Kromeier, Miriam, Bach, Michael, Kommerell, Guntram
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18379816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0798-3
_version_ 1782152499370655744
author Otto, Joanna M. N.
Kromeier, Miriam
Bach, Michael
Kommerell, Guntram
author_facet Otto, Joanna M. N.
Kromeier, Miriam
Bach, Michael
Kommerell, Guntram
author_sort Otto, Joanna M. N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dissociated and associated phoria are measures of latent strabismus under artificial viewing conditions. We examined to what extent dissociated and associated phoria predict the “comfortable prism”, i.e. the prism that appears most comfortable under natural viewing conditions. METHODS: For associated phoria, a configuration resembling the Mallett test was employed: both eyes were presented with a fixation cross, surrounded by fusionable objects. Nonius lines served as monocular markers. For dissociated phoria, the left eye was presented with all the Mallett elements, while only a white spot was presented to the right eye. To determine the comfortable prism, all the Mallett elements, including the Nonius lines, were shown to both eyes. In each of the three tests, the observer had to adjust a pair of counterrotating prisms. To avoid any (possibly prejudiced) influence of the experimenter, the prismatic power was recorded with a potentiometer. Twenty non-strabismic subjects with a visual acuity of ≥1.0 in each eye were examined. RESULTS: The range of the intertrial mean was for dissociated phoria from +9.3 eso to −5.9 cm/m exo, for associated phoria from +11.2 eso to −3.3 cm/m exo, and for the comfortable prism from +4.8 eso to −4.1 cm/m exo (cm/m = prism dioptre). In most observers, the phoria parameters differed greatly from the comfortable prism. On average, the phoria values were shifted about 2 cm/m towards the eso direction in relation to the comfortable prism (associated phoria not less than dissociated phoria). CONCLUSIONS: The deviation of both, dissociated and associated phoria, from the comfortable prism suggests that the abnormal viewing conditions under which the phoria parameters are determined induce artefacts. Accordingly, the findings cast doubt on current textbook recommendations to use dissociated or associated phoria as a basis for therapeutic prisms. Rather, patients should be allowed to determine their comfortable prism under natural viewing conditions.
format Text
id pubmed-2292470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22924702008-04-11 Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism? Otto, Joanna M. N. Kromeier, Miriam Bach, Michael Kommerell, Guntram Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Neurophthalmology BACKGROUND: Dissociated and associated phoria are measures of latent strabismus under artificial viewing conditions. We examined to what extent dissociated and associated phoria predict the “comfortable prism”, i.e. the prism that appears most comfortable under natural viewing conditions. METHODS: For associated phoria, a configuration resembling the Mallett test was employed: both eyes were presented with a fixation cross, surrounded by fusionable objects. Nonius lines served as monocular markers. For dissociated phoria, the left eye was presented with all the Mallett elements, while only a white spot was presented to the right eye. To determine the comfortable prism, all the Mallett elements, including the Nonius lines, were shown to both eyes. In each of the three tests, the observer had to adjust a pair of counterrotating prisms. To avoid any (possibly prejudiced) influence of the experimenter, the prismatic power was recorded with a potentiometer. Twenty non-strabismic subjects with a visual acuity of ≥1.0 in each eye were examined. RESULTS: The range of the intertrial mean was for dissociated phoria from +9.3 eso to −5.9 cm/m exo, for associated phoria from +11.2 eso to −3.3 cm/m exo, and for the comfortable prism from +4.8 eso to −4.1 cm/m exo (cm/m = prism dioptre). In most observers, the phoria parameters differed greatly from the comfortable prism. On average, the phoria values were shifted about 2 cm/m towards the eso direction in relation to the comfortable prism (associated phoria not less than dissociated phoria). CONCLUSIONS: The deviation of both, dissociated and associated phoria, from the comfortable prism suggests that the abnormal viewing conditions under which the phoria parameters are determined induce artefacts. Accordingly, the findings cast doubt on current textbook recommendations to use dissociated or associated phoria as a basis for therapeutic prisms. Rather, patients should be allowed to determine their comfortable prism under natural viewing conditions. Springer-Verlag 2008-04-01 2008-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2292470/ /pubmed/18379816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0798-3 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2008
spellingShingle Neurophthalmology
Otto, Joanna M. N.
Kromeier, Miriam
Bach, Michael
Kommerell, Guntram
Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
title Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
title_full Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
title_fullStr Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
title_full_unstemmed Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
title_short Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
title_sort do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
topic Neurophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18379816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0798-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ottojoannamn dodissociatedorassociatedphoriapredictthecomfortableprism
AT kromeiermiriam dodissociatedorassociatedphoriapredictthecomfortableprism
AT bachmichael dodissociatedorassociatedphoriapredictthecomfortableprism
AT kommerellguntram dodissociatedorassociatedphoriapredictthecomfortableprism