Cargando…

Influence of the incremental step size in work rate on exercise response and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has become increasingly important as a routine procedure in daily clinical work. So far, it is generally accepted that an individualized exercise protocol with exercise duration of 6 to 12 minutes is preferable to assess maximal exercise performanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gläser, Sven, Lodziewski, Sven, Koch, Beate, Opitz, Christian F, Völzke, Henry, Ewert, Ralf
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18294393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-8-3
_version_ 1782152507029454848
author Gläser, Sven
Lodziewski, Sven
Koch, Beate
Opitz, Christian F
Völzke, Henry
Ewert, Ralf
author_facet Gläser, Sven
Lodziewski, Sven
Koch, Beate
Opitz, Christian F
Völzke, Henry
Ewert, Ralf
author_sort Gläser, Sven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has become increasingly important as a routine procedure in daily clinical work. So far, it is generally accepted that an individualized exercise protocol with exercise duration of 6 to 12 minutes is preferable to assess maximal exercise performance. The aim of this study was to compare an individualized NYHA adapted exercise protocol with a fixed standard protocol in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (17 female, 5 male; mean age 49 ± 14 yrs) underwent symptom limited CPET on a bicycle. On two consecutive days each subject performed a stepwise CPET according to a modified Jones protocol (16 Watt per minute stages) as well as an individualized NYHA adapted protocol with 5 or 10 Watt/min stages in a randomized order. Oxygen uptake at peak exercise (peakVO(2)) and anaerobic threshold (VO(2)AT), maximal ventilation (VE), breathing reserve (VE/MVV), ventilatory efficiency (VE vs. VCO(2 )slope), exercise time, maximal power and work rate were assessed and compared between both protocols. RESULTS: Comparing both, adapted NYHA protocol and standardized Jones protocol, we found significant differences in maximal power (56.7 ± 19 W vs. 74 ± 18 W; p < 0.001) and exercise time (332 ± 107 sec. vs. 248 ± 72 sec.; p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant differences were obvious comparing both protocols concerning work rate, VE, VE/MVV, peakVO(2), VO(2)AT and VE vs. VCO(2 )slope. CONCLUSION: Variations of incremental step size during CPET significantly affect exercise time and maximal power, whereas relevant parameters for clinical judgement and prognosis such as oxygen uptake, ventilation and ventilatory efficiency remain unchanged. These findings have practical implications for the exercise evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension. To reach maximal results for ventilation, oxygen uptake and gas exchange an individualization of incremental step size appears not to be mandatory.
format Text
id pubmed-2292676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22926762008-04-12 Influence of the incremental step size in work rate on exercise response and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension Gläser, Sven Lodziewski, Sven Koch, Beate Opitz, Christian F Völzke, Henry Ewert, Ralf BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has become increasingly important as a routine procedure in daily clinical work. So far, it is generally accepted that an individualized exercise protocol with exercise duration of 6 to 12 minutes is preferable to assess maximal exercise performance. The aim of this study was to compare an individualized NYHA adapted exercise protocol with a fixed standard protocol in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (17 female, 5 male; mean age 49 ± 14 yrs) underwent symptom limited CPET on a bicycle. On two consecutive days each subject performed a stepwise CPET according to a modified Jones protocol (16 Watt per minute stages) as well as an individualized NYHA adapted protocol with 5 or 10 Watt/min stages in a randomized order. Oxygen uptake at peak exercise (peakVO(2)) and anaerobic threshold (VO(2)AT), maximal ventilation (VE), breathing reserve (VE/MVV), ventilatory efficiency (VE vs. VCO(2 )slope), exercise time, maximal power and work rate were assessed and compared between both protocols. RESULTS: Comparing both, adapted NYHA protocol and standardized Jones protocol, we found significant differences in maximal power (56.7 ± 19 W vs. 74 ± 18 W; p < 0.001) and exercise time (332 ± 107 sec. vs. 248 ± 72 sec.; p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant differences were obvious comparing both protocols concerning work rate, VE, VE/MVV, peakVO(2), VO(2)AT and VE vs. VCO(2 )slope. CONCLUSION: Variations of incremental step size during CPET significantly affect exercise time and maximal power, whereas relevant parameters for clinical judgement and prognosis such as oxygen uptake, ventilation and ventilatory efficiency remain unchanged. These findings have practical implications for the exercise evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension. To reach maximal results for ventilation, oxygen uptake and gas exchange an individualization of incremental step size appears not to be mandatory. BioMed Central 2008-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2292676/ /pubmed/18294393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-8-3 Text en Copyright © 2008 Gläser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gläser, Sven
Lodziewski, Sven
Koch, Beate
Opitz, Christian F
Völzke, Henry
Ewert, Ralf
Influence of the incremental step size in work rate on exercise response and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension
title Influence of the incremental step size in work rate on exercise response and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_full Influence of the incremental step size in work rate on exercise response and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_fullStr Influence of the incremental step size in work rate on exercise response and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the incremental step size in work rate on exercise response and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_short Influence of the incremental step size in work rate on exercise response and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_sort influence of the incremental step size in work rate on exercise response and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18294393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-8-3
work_keys_str_mv AT glasersven influenceoftheincrementalstepsizeinworkrateonexerciseresponseandgasexchangeinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT lodziewskisven influenceoftheincrementalstepsizeinworkrateonexerciseresponseandgasexchangeinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT kochbeate influenceoftheincrementalstepsizeinworkrateonexerciseresponseandgasexchangeinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT opitzchristianf influenceoftheincrementalstepsizeinworkrateonexerciseresponseandgasexchangeinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT volzkehenry influenceoftheincrementalstepsizeinworkrateonexerciseresponseandgasexchangeinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT ewertralf influenceoftheincrementalstepsizeinworkrateonexerciseresponseandgasexchangeinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension