Cargando…

Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome

BACKGROUND: Mammalian genomes consist of regions differing in GC content, referred to as isochores or GC-content domains. The scientific debate is still open as to whether such compositional heterogeneity is a selected or neutral trait. RESULTS: Here we analyze SNP allele frequencies, retrotransposo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pozzoli, Uberto, Menozzi, Giorgia, Fumagalli, Matteo, Cereda, Matteo, Comi, Giacomo P, Cagliani, Rachele, Bresolin, Nereo, Sironi, Manuela
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18371205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-99
_version_ 1782152512076251136
author Pozzoli, Uberto
Menozzi, Giorgia
Fumagalli, Matteo
Cereda, Matteo
Comi, Giacomo P
Cagliani, Rachele
Bresolin, Nereo
Sironi, Manuela
author_facet Pozzoli, Uberto
Menozzi, Giorgia
Fumagalli, Matteo
Cereda, Matteo
Comi, Giacomo P
Cagliani, Rachele
Bresolin, Nereo
Sironi, Manuela
author_sort Pozzoli, Uberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mammalian genomes consist of regions differing in GC content, referred to as isochores or GC-content domains. The scientific debate is still open as to whether such compositional heterogeneity is a selected or neutral trait. RESULTS: Here we analyze SNP allele frequencies, retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms (RIPs), as well as fixed substitutions accumulated in the human lineage since its divergence from chimpanzee to indicate that biased gene conversion (BGC) has been playing a role in within-genome GC content variation. Yet, a distinct contribution to GC content evolution is accounted for by a selective process. Accordingly, we searched for independent evidences that GC content distribution does not conform to neutral expectations. Indeed, after correcting for possible biases, we show that intron GC content and size display isochore-specific correlations. CONCLUSION: We consider that the more parsimonious explanation for our results is that GC content is subjected to the action of both weak selection and BGC in the human genome with features such as nucleosome positioning or chromatin conformation possibly representing the final target of selective processes. This view might reconcile previous contrasting findings and add some theoretical background to recent evidences suggesting that GC content domains display different behaviors with respect to highly regulated biological processes such as developmentally-stage related gene expression and programmed replication timing during neural stem cell differentiation.
format Text
id pubmed-2292697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22926972008-04-12 Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome Pozzoli, Uberto Menozzi, Giorgia Fumagalli, Matteo Cereda, Matteo Comi, Giacomo P Cagliani, Rachele Bresolin, Nereo Sironi, Manuela BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Mammalian genomes consist of regions differing in GC content, referred to as isochores or GC-content domains. The scientific debate is still open as to whether such compositional heterogeneity is a selected or neutral trait. RESULTS: Here we analyze SNP allele frequencies, retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms (RIPs), as well as fixed substitutions accumulated in the human lineage since its divergence from chimpanzee to indicate that biased gene conversion (BGC) has been playing a role in within-genome GC content variation. Yet, a distinct contribution to GC content evolution is accounted for by a selective process. Accordingly, we searched for independent evidences that GC content distribution does not conform to neutral expectations. Indeed, after correcting for possible biases, we show that intron GC content and size display isochore-specific correlations. CONCLUSION: We consider that the more parsimonious explanation for our results is that GC content is subjected to the action of both weak selection and BGC in the human genome with features such as nucleosome positioning or chromatin conformation possibly representing the final target of selective processes. This view might reconcile previous contrasting findings and add some theoretical background to recent evidences suggesting that GC content domains display different behaviors with respect to highly regulated biological processes such as developmentally-stage related gene expression and programmed replication timing during neural stem cell differentiation. BioMed Central 2008-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2292697/ /pubmed/18371205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-99 Text en Copyright ©2008 Pozzoli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pozzoli, Uberto
Menozzi, Giorgia
Fumagalli, Matteo
Cereda, Matteo
Comi, Giacomo P
Cagliani, Rachele
Bresolin, Nereo
Sironi, Manuela
Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome
title Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome
title_full Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome
title_fullStr Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome
title_full_unstemmed Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome
title_short Both selective and neutral processes drive GC content evolution in the human genome
title_sort both selective and neutral processes drive gc content evolution in the human genome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18371205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-99
work_keys_str_mv AT pozzoliuberto bothselectiveandneutralprocessesdrivegccontentevolutioninthehumangenome
AT menozzigiorgia bothselectiveandneutralprocessesdrivegccontentevolutioninthehumangenome
AT fumagallimatteo bothselectiveandneutralprocessesdrivegccontentevolutioninthehumangenome
AT ceredamatteo bothselectiveandneutralprocessesdrivegccontentevolutioninthehumangenome
AT comigiacomop bothselectiveandneutralprocessesdrivegccontentevolutioninthehumangenome
AT caglianirachele bothselectiveandneutralprocessesdrivegccontentevolutioninthehumangenome
AT bresolinnereo bothselectiveandneutralprocessesdrivegccontentevolutioninthehumangenome
AT sironimanuela bothselectiveandneutralprocessesdrivegccontentevolutioninthehumangenome