Cargando…

Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: Single-agent gemcitabine (GEM) is a standard treatment for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study examines the question whether GEM-based combination chemotherapy can further improve treatment efficacy. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate randomized trials c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinemann, Volker, Boeck, Stefan, Hinke, Axel, Labianca, Roberto, Louvet, Christophe
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18373843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-82
_version_ 1782152521183133696
author Heinemann, Volker
Boeck, Stefan
Hinke, Axel
Labianca, Roberto
Louvet, Christophe
author_facet Heinemann, Volker
Boeck, Stefan
Hinke, Axel
Labianca, Roberto
Louvet, Christophe
author_sort Heinemann, Volker
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-agent gemcitabine (GEM) is a standard treatment for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study examines the question whether GEM-based combination chemotherapy can further improve treatment efficacy. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate randomized trials comparing GEM versus GEM+X (X = cytotoxic agent). Fifteen trials including 4465 patients were eligible for an analysis of overall survival, the primary end-point of this investigation. RESULTS: The meta-analysis revealed a significant survival benefit for GEM+X with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85 – 0.97, p = 0.004). The overall test for heterogeneity resulted in p = 0.82 (I(2 )= 0%). The analysis of platinum-based combinations indicated a HR of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76 – 0.96, p = 0.010), while for fluoropyrimidine-based combinations the HR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81 – 0.99, p = 0.030). No risk reduction was observed in the group of trials combining GEM with irinotecan, exatecan or pemetrexed (HR = 0.99). A meta-analysis of the trials with adequate information on baseline performance status (PS) was performed in five trials with 1682 patients. This analysis indicated that patients with a good PS had a marked survival benefit when receiving combination chemotherapy (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.67 – 0.87; p < 0.0001). By contrast, application of combination chemotherapy to patients with an initially poor PS appeared to be ineffective (HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.90 – 1.29, p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis of randomized trials indicated a significant survival benefit when GEM was either combined with platinum analogs or fluoropyrimidines. Based on a preliminary subgroup analysis (representing 38% of all patients included in this meta-analysis), pancreatic cancer patients with a good PS appear to benefit from GEM-based cytotoxic combinations, whereas patients with a poor PS seem to have no survival benefit from combination chemotherapy.
format Text
id pubmed-2292732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-22927322008-04-12 Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer Heinemann, Volker Boeck, Stefan Hinke, Axel Labianca, Roberto Louvet, Christophe BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Single-agent gemcitabine (GEM) is a standard treatment for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study examines the question whether GEM-based combination chemotherapy can further improve treatment efficacy. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate randomized trials comparing GEM versus GEM+X (X = cytotoxic agent). Fifteen trials including 4465 patients were eligible for an analysis of overall survival, the primary end-point of this investigation. RESULTS: The meta-analysis revealed a significant survival benefit for GEM+X with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85 – 0.97, p = 0.004). The overall test for heterogeneity resulted in p = 0.82 (I(2 )= 0%). The analysis of platinum-based combinations indicated a HR of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76 – 0.96, p = 0.010), while for fluoropyrimidine-based combinations the HR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81 – 0.99, p = 0.030). No risk reduction was observed in the group of trials combining GEM with irinotecan, exatecan or pemetrexed (HR = 0.99). A meta-analysis of the trials with adequate information on baseline performance status (PS) was performed in five trials with 1682 patients. This analysis indicated that patients with a good PS had a marked survival benefit when receiving combination chemotherapy (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.67 – 0.87; p < 0.0001). By contrast, application of combination chemotherapy to patients with an initially poor PS appeared to be ineffective (HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.90 – 1.29, p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis of randomized trials indicated a significant survival benefit when GEM was either combined with platinum analogs or fluoropyrimidines. Based on a preliminary subgroup analysis (representing 38% of all patients included in this meta-analysis), pancreatic cancer patients with a good PS appear to benefit from GEM-based cytotoxic combinations, whereas patients with a poor PS seem to have no survival benefit from combination chemotherapy. BioMed Central 2008-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2292732/ /pubmed/18373843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-82 Text en Copyright © 2008 Heinemann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heinemann, Volker
Boeck, Stefan
Hinke, Axel
Labianca, Roberto
Louvet, Christophe
Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
title Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
title_full Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
title_short Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
title_sort meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18373843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-82
work_keys_str_mv AT heinemannvolker metaanalysisofrandomizedtrialsevaluationofbenefitfromgemcitabinebasedcombinationchemotherapyappliedinadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT boeckstefan metaanalysisofrandomizedtrialsevaluationofbenefitfromgemcitabinebasedcombinationchemotherapyappliedinadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT hinkeaxel metaanalysisofrandomizedtrialsevaluationofbenefitfromgemcitabinebasedcombinationchemotherapyappliedinadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT labiancaroberto metaanalysisofrandomizedtrialsevaluationofbenefitfromgemcitabinebasedcombinationchemotherapyappliedinadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT louvetchristophe metaanalysisofrandomizedtrialsevaluationofbenefitfromgemcitabinebasedcombinationchemotherapyappliedinadvancedpancreaticcancer