Cargando…
Cooperation and Deception Recruit Different Subsets of the Theory-of-Mind Network
The term “theory of mind” (ToM) describes an evolved psychological mechanism that is necessary to represent intentions and expectations in social interaction. It is thus involved in determining the proclivity of others to cooperate or defect. While in cooperative settings between two parties the int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2295259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18431500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002023 |
_version_ | 1782152546073182208 |
---|---|
author | Lissek, Silke Peters, Sören Fuchs, Nina Witthaus, Henning Nicolas, Volkmar Tegenthoff, Martin Juckel, Georg Brüne, Martin |
author_facet | Lissek, Silke Peters, Sören Fuchs, Nina Witthaus, Henning Nicolas, Volkmar Tegenthoff, Martin Juckel, Georg Brüne, Martin |
author_sort | Lissek, Silke |
collection | PubMed |
description | The term “theory of mind” (ToM) describes an evolved psychological mechanism that is necessary to represent intentions and expectations in social interaction. It is thus involved in determining the proclivity of others to cooperate or defect. While in cooperative settings between two parties the intentions and expectations of the protagonists match, they diverge in deceptive scenarios, in which one protagonist is intentionally manipulated to hold a false belief about the intention of the other. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm using cartoons showing social interactions (including the outcome of the interaction) between two or three story characters, respectively, we sought to determine those brain areas of the ToM network involved in reasoning about cooperative versus deceptive interactions. Healthy volunteers were asked to reflect upon the protagonists' intentions and expectations in cartoons depicting cooperation, deception or a combination of both, where two characters cooperated to deceive a third. Reasoning about the mental states of the story characters yielded substantial differences in activation patterns: both deception and cooperation activated bilateral temporoparietal junction, parietal and cingulate regions, while deception alone additionally recruited orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal regions. These results indicate an important role for prefrontal cortex in processing a mismatch between a character's intention and another's expectations as required in complex social interactions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2295259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-22952592008-04-23 Cooperation and Deception Recruit Different Subsets of the Theory-of-Mind Network Lissek, Silke Peters, Sören Fuchs, Nina Witthaus, Henning Nicolas, Volkmar Tegenthoff, Martin Juckel, Georg Brüne, Martin PLoS One Research Article The term “theory of mind” (ToM) describes an evolved psychological mechanism that is necessary to represent intentions and expectations in social interaction. It is thus involved in determining the proclivity of others to cooperate or defect. While in cooperative settings between two parties the intentions and expectations of the protagonists match, they diverge in deceptive scenarios, in which one protagonist is intentionally manipulated to hold a false belief about the intention of the other. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm using cartoons showing social interactions (including the outcome of the interaction) between two or three story characters, respectively, we sought to determine those brain areas of the ToM network involved in reasoning about cooperative versus deceptive interactions. Healthy volunteers were asked to reflect upon the protagonists' intentions and expectations in cartoons depicting cooperation, deception or a combination of both, where two characters cooperated to deceive a third. Reasoning about the mental states of the story characters yielded substantial differences in activation patterns: both deception and cooperation activated bilateral temporoparietal junction, parietal and cingulate regions, while deception alone additionally recruited orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal regions. These results indicate an important role for prefrontal cortex in processing a mismatch between a character's intention and another's expectations as required in complex social interactions. Public Library of Science 2008-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2295259/ /pubmed/18431500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002023 Text en Lissek et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lissek, Silke Peters, Sören Fuchs, Nina Witthaus, Henning Nicolas, Volkmar Tegenthoff, Martin Juckel, Georg Brüne, Martin Cooperation and Deception Recruit Different Subsets of the Theory-of-Mind Network |
title | Cooperation and Deception Recruit Different Subsets of the Theory-of-Mind Network |
title_full | Cooperation and Deception Recruit Different Subsets of the Theory-of-Mind Network |
title_fullStr | Cooperation and Deception Recruit Different Subsets of the Theory-of-Mind Network |
title_full_unstemmed | Cooperation and Deception Recruit Different Subsets of the Theory-of-Mind Network |
title_short | Cooperation and Deception Recruit Different Subsets of the Theory-of-Mind Network |
title_sort | cooperation and deception recruit different subsets of the theory-of-mind network |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2295259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18431500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lisseksilke cooperationanddeceptionrecruitdifferentsubsetsofthetheoryofmindnetwork AT peterssoren cooperationanddeceptionrecruitdifferentsubsetsofthetheoryofmindnetwork AT fuchsnina cooperationanddeceptionrecruitdifferentsubsetsofthetheoryofmindnetwork AT witthaushenning cooperationanddeceptionrecruitdifferentsubsetsofthetheoryofmindnetwork AT nicolasvolkmar cooperationanddeceptionrecruitdifferentsubsetsofthetheoryofmindnetwork AT tegenthoffmartin cooperationanddeceptionrecruitdifferentsubsetsofthetheoryofmindnetwork AT juckelgeorg cooperationanddeceptionrecruitdifferentsubsetsofthetheoryofmindnetwork AT brunemartin cooperationanddeceptionrecruitdifferentsubsetsofthetheoryofmindnetwork |