Cargando…

New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Current practice is to perform a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer patients with tumor-involved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), although fewer than half will have non-sentinel node (NSLN) metastasis. Our goal was to develop new models to quantify the risk of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kohrt, Holbrook E, Olshen, Richard A, Bermas, Honnie R, Goodson, William H, Wood, Douglas J, Henry, Solomon, Rouse, Robert V, Bailey, Lisa, Philben, Vicki J, Dirbas, Frederick M, Dunn, Jocelyn J, Johnson, Denise L, Wapnir, Irene L, Carlson, Robert W, Stockdale, Frank E, Hansen, Nora M, Jeffrey, Stefanie S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2311316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18315887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-66
_version_ 1782152562179309568
author Kohrt, Holbrook E
Olshen, Richard A
Bermas, Honnie R
Goodson, William H
Wood, Douglas J
Henry, Solomon
Rouse, Robert V
Bailey, Lisa
Philben, Vicki J
Dirbas, Frederick M
Dunn, Jocelyn J
Johnson, Denise L
Wapnir, Irene L
Carlson, Robert W
Stockdale, Frank E
Hansen, Nora M
Jeffrey, Stefanie S
author_facet Kohrt, Holbrook E
Olshen, Richard A
Bermas, Honnie R
Goodson, William H
Wood, Douglas J
Henry, Solomon
Rouse, Robert V
Bailey, Lisa
Philben, Vicki J
Dirbas, Frederick M
Dunn, Jocelyn J
Johnson, Denise L
Wapnir, Irene L
Carlson, Robert W
Stockdale, Frank E
Hansen, Nora M
Jeffrey, Stefanie S
author_sort Kohrt, Holbrook E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current practice is to perform a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer patients with tumor-involved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), although fewer than half will have non-sentinel node (NSLN) metastasis. Our goal was to develop new models to quantify the risk of NSLN metastasis in SLN-positive patients and to compare predictive capabilities to another widely used model. METHODS: We constructed three models to predict NSLN status: recursive partitioning with receiver operating characteristic curves (RP-ROC), boosted Classification and Regression Trees (CART), and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) informed by CART. Data were compiled from a multicenter Northern California and Oregon database of 784 patients who prospectively underwent SLN biopsy and completion ALND. We compared the predictive abilities of our best model and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Breast Cancer Nomogram (Nomogram) in our dataset and an independent dataset from Northwestern University. RESULTS: 285 patients had positive SLNs, of which 213 had known angiolymphatic invasion status and 171 had complete pathologic data including hormone receptor status. 264 (93%) patients had limited SLN disease (micrometastasis, 70%, or isolated tumor cells, 23%). 101 (35%) of all SLN-positive patients had tumor-involved NSLNs. Three variables (tumor size, angiolymphatic invasion, and SLN metastasis size) predicted risk in all our models. RP-ROC and boosted CART stratified patients into four risk levels. MLR informed by CART was most accurate. Using two composite predictors calculated from three variables, MLR informed by CART was more accurate than the Nomogram computed using eight predictors. In our dataset, area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.83/0.85 for MLR (n = 213/n = 171) and 0.77 for Nomogram (n = 171). When applied to an independent dataset (n = 77), AUC was 0.74 for our model and 0.62 for Nomogram. The composite predictors in our model were the product of angiolymphatic invasion and size of SLN metastasis, and the product of tumor size and square of SLN metastasis size. CONCLUSION: We present a new model developed from a community-based SLN database that uses only three rather than eight variables to achieve higher accuracy than the Nomogram for predicting NSLN status in two different datasets.
format Text
id pubmed-2311316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23113162008-04-16 New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients Kohrt, Holbrook E Olshen, Richard A Bermas, Honnie R Goodson, William H Wood, Douglas J Henry, Solomon Rouse, Robert V Bailey, Lisa Philben, Vicki J Dirbas, Frederick M Dunn, Jocelyn J Johnson, Denise L Wapnir, Irene L Carlson, Robert W Stockdale, Frank E Hansen, Nora M Jeffrey, Stefanie S BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Current practice is to perform a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer patients with tumor-involved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), although fewer than half will have non-sentinel node (NSLN) metastasis. Our goal was to develop new models to quantify the risk of NSLN metastasis in SLN-positive patients and to compare predictive capabilities to another widely used model. METHODS: We constructed three models to predict NSLN status: recursive partitioning with receiver operating characteristic curves (RP-ROC), boosted Classification and Regression Trees (CART), and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) informed by CART. Data were compiled from a multicenter Northern California and Oregon database of 784 patients who prospectively underwent SLN biopsy and completion ALND. We compared the predictive abilities of our best model and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Breast Cancer Nomogram (Nomogram) in our dataset and an independent dataset from Northwestern University. RESULTS: 285 patients had positive SLNs, of which 213 had known angiolymphatic invasion status and 171 had complete pathologic data including hormone receptor status. 264 (93%) patients had limited SLN disease (micrometastasis, 70%, or isolated tumor cells, 23%). 101 (35%) of all SLN-positive patients had tumor-involved NSLNs. Three variables (tumor size, angiolymphatic invasion, and SLN metastasis size) predicted risk in all our models. RP-ROC and boosted CART stratified patients into four risk levels. MLR informed by CART was most accurate. Using two composite predictors calculated from three variables, MLR informed by CART was more accurate than the Nomogram computed using eight predictors. In our dataset, area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.83/0.85 for MLR (n = 213/n = 171) and 0.77 for Nomogram (n = 171). When applied to an independent dataset (n = 77), AUC was 0.74 for our model and 0.62 for Nomogram. The composite predictors in our model were the product of angiolymphatic invasion and size of SLN metastasis, and the product of tumor size and square of SLN metastasis size. CONCLUSION: We present a new model developed from a community-based SLN database that uses only three rather than eight variables to achieve higher accuracy than the Nomogram for predicting NSLN status in two different datasets. BioMed Central 2008-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2311316/ /pubmed/18315887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-66 Text en Copyright © 2008 Kohrt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kohrt, Holbrook E
Olshen, Richard A
Bermas, Honnie R
Goodson, William H
Wood, Douglas J
Henry, Solomon
Rouse, Robert V
Bailey, Lisa
Philben, Vicki J
Dirbas, Frederick M
Dunn, Jocelyn J
Johnson, Denise L
Wapnir, Irene L
Carlson, Robert W
Stockdale, Frank E
Hansen, Nora M
Jeffrey, Stefanie S
New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients
title New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients
title_full New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients
title_fullStr New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients
title_short New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients
title_sort new models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2311316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18315887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-66
work_keys_str_mv AT kohrtholbrooke newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT olshenricharda newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT bermashonnier newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT goodsonwilliamh newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT wooddouglasj newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT henrysolomon newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT rouserobertv newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT baileylisa newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT philbenvickij newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT dirbasfrederickm newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT dunnjocelynj newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT johnsondenisel newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT wapnirirenel newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT carlsonrobertw newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT stockdalefranke newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT hansennoram newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT jeffreystefanies newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients
AT newmodelsandonlinecalculatorforpredictingnonsentinellymphnodestatusinsentinellymphnodepositivebreastcancerpatients