Cargando…

The role of bacteria in lactational mastitis and some considerations of the use of antibiotic treatment

BACKGROUND: The role of bacterial pathogens in lactational mastitis remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare bacterial species in breast milk of women with mastitis and of healthy breast milk donors and to evaluate the use of antibiotic therapy, the symptoms of mastitis, number of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kvist, Linda J, Larsson, Bodil Wilde, Hall-Lord, Marie Louise, Steen, Anita, Schalén, Claes
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2322959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18394188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-3-6
_version_ 1782152601877348352
author Kvist, Linda J
Larsson, Bodil Wilde
Hall-Lord, Marie Louise
Steen, Anita
Schalén, Claes
author_facet Kvist, Linda J
Larsson, Bodil Wilde
Hall-Lord, Marie Louise
Steen, Anita
Schalén, Claes
author_sort Kvist, Linda J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of bacterial pathogens in lactational mastitis remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare bacterial species in breast milk of women with mastitis and of healthy breast milk donors and to evaluate the use of antibiotic therapy, the symptoms of mastitis, number of health care contacts, occurrence of breast abscess, damaged nipples and recurrent symptoms in relation to bacterial counts. METHODS: In this descriptive study, breast milk from 192 women with mastitis (referred to as cases) and 466 breast milk donors (referred to as controls) was examined bacteriologically and compared using analytical statistics. Statistical analyses were also carried out to test for relationships between bacteriological content and clinical symptoms as measured on scales, prescription of antibiotics, the number of care contacts, occurrence of breast abscess and recurring symptoms. RESULTS: Five main bacterial species were found in both cases and controls: coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), viridans streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Group B streptococci (GBS) and Enterococcus faecalis. More women with mastitis had S. aureus and GBS in their breast milk than those without symptoms, although 31% of healthy women harboured S. aureus and 10% had GBS. There were no significant correlations between bacterial counts and the symptoms of mastitis as measured on scales. There were no differences in bacterial counts between those prescribed and not prescribed antibiotics or those with and without breast abscess. GBS in breast milk was associated with increased health care contacts (p = 0.02). Women with ≥ 10(7 )cfu/L CNS or viridans streptococci in their breast milk had increased odds for damaged nipples (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Many healthy breastfeeding women have potentially pathogenic bacteria in their breast milk. Increasing bacterial counts did not affect the clinical manifestation of mastitis; thus bacterial counts in breast milk may be of limited value in the decision to treat with antibiotics as results from bacterial culture of breast milk may be difficult to interpret. These results suggest that the division of mastitis into infective or non-infective forms may not be practically feasible. Daily follow-up to measure the subsidence of symptoms can help detect those in need of antibiotics.
format Text
id pubmed-2322959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23229592008-04-18 The role of bacteria in lactational mastitis and some considerations of the use of antibiotic treatment Kvist, Linda J Larsson, Bodil Wilde Hall-Lord, Marie Louise Steen, Anita Schalén, Claes Int Breastfeed J Research BACKGROUND: The role of bacterial pathogens in lactational mastitis remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare bacterial species in breast milk of women with mastitis and of healthy breast milk donors and to evaluate the use of antibiotic therapy, the symptoms of mastitis, number of health care contacts, occurrence of breast abscess, damaged nipples and recurrent symptoms in relation to bacterial counts. METHODS: In this descriptive study, breast milk from 192 women with mastitis (referred to as cases) and 466 breast milk donors (referred to as controls) was examined bacteriologically and compared using analytical statistics. Statistical analyses were also carried out to test for relationships between bacteriological content and clinical symptoms as measured on scales, prescription of antibiotics, the number of care contacts, occurrence of breast abscess and recurring symptoms. RESULTS: Five main bacterial species were found in both cases and controls: coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), viridans streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Group B streptococci (GBS) and Enterococcus faecalis. More women with mastitis had S. aureus and GBS in their breast milk than those without symptoms, although 31% of healthy women harboured S. aureus and 10% had GBS. There were no significant correlations between bacterial counts and the symptoms of mastitis as measured on scales. There were no differences in bacterial counts between those prescribed and not prescribed antibiotics or those with and without breast abscess. GBS in breast milk was associated with increased health care contacts (p = 0.02). Women with ≥ 10(7 )cfu/L CNS or viridans streptococci in their breast milk had increased odds for damaged nipples (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Many healthy breastfeeding women have potentially pathogenic bacteria in their breast milk. Increasing bacterial counts did not affect the clinical manifestation of mastitis; thus bacterial counts in breast milk may be of limited value in the decision to treat with antibiotics as results from bacterial culture of breast milk may be difficult to interpret. These results suggest that the division of mastitis into infective or non-infective forms may not be practically feasible. Daily follow-up to measure the subsidence of symptoms can help detect those in need of antibiotics. BioMed Central 2008-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2322959/ /pubmed/18394188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-3-6 Text en Copyright © 2008 Kvist et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kvist, Linda J
Larsson, Bodil Wilde
Hall-Lord, Marie Louise
Steen, Anita
Schalén, Claes
The role of bacteria in lactational mastitis and some considerations of the use of antibiotic treatment
title The role of bacteria in lactational mastitis and some considerations of the use of antibiotic treatment
title_full The role of bacteria in lactational mastitis and some considerations of the use of antibiotic treatment
title_fullStr The role of bacteria in lactational mastitis and some considerations of the use of antibiotic treatment
title_full_unstemmed The role of bacteria in lactational mastitis and some considerations of the use of antibiotic treatment
title_short The role of bacteria in lactational mastitis and some considerations of the use of antibiotic treatment
title_sort role of bacteria in lactational mastitis and some considerations of the use of antibiotic treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2322959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18394188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-3-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kvistlindaj theroleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment
AT larssonbodilwilde theroleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment
AT halllordmarielouise theroleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment
AT steenanita theroleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment
AT schalenclaes theroleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment
AT kvistlindaj roleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment
AT larssonbodilwilde roleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment
AT halllordmarielouise roleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment
AT steenanita roleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment
AT schalenclaes roleofbacteriainlactationalmastitisandsomeconsiderationsoftheuseofantibiotictreatment