Cargando…

Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial

BACKGROUND: Thymostimulin is a thymic peptide fraction with immune-mediated cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro. In a phase II trial, we investigated safety and efficacy including selection criteria for best response in advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: 4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dollinger, Matthias M, Behrens, Christa M, Lesske, Joachim, Behl, Susanne, Behrmann, Curd, Fleig, Wolfgang E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18366627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-72
_version_ 1782152613732548608
author Dollinger, Matthias M
Behrens, Christa M
Lesske, Joachim
Behl, Susanne
Behrmann, Curd
Fleig, Wolfgang E
author_facet Dollinger, Matthias M
Behrens, Christa M
Lesske, Joachim
Behl, Susanne
Behrmann, Curd
Fleig, Wolfgang E
author_sort Dollinger, Matthias M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Thymostimulin is a thymic peptide fraction with immune-mediated cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro. In a phase II trial, we investigated safety and efficacy including selection criteria for best response in advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: 44 patients (84 % male, median age 69 years) not suitable or refractory to conventional therapy received thymostimulin 75 mg subcutaneously five times per week for a median of 8.2 months until progression or complete response. 3/44 patients were secondarily accessible to local ablation or chemoembolisation. Primary endpoint was overall survival, secondary endpoint tumor response or progression-free survival. A multivariate Cox's regression model was used to identify variables affecting survival. RESULTS: Median survival was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.9–15.0) with a 1-, 2- and 3-year survival of 50%, 23% and 9%. In the univariate analysis, a low Child-Pugh-score (p = 0.01), a low score in the Okuda- and CLIP-classification (p < 0.001) or a low AFP-level (p < 0.001) were associated with better survival, but not therapy modalities other than thymostimulin (p = 0.1) or signs of an invasive HCC phenotype such as vascular invasion (p = 0.3) and metastases (p = 0.1). The only variables independently related to survival in the Cox's regression model were Okuda stage and presence of liver cirrhosis (p < 0.01) as well as response to thymostimulin (p < 0.05). Of 39/44 patients evaluable for response, two obtained complete responses (one after concomitant radiofrequency ablation), five partial responses (objective response 18%), twenty-four stable disease (tumor control rate 79%) and eight progressed. Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (95% CI 0.8–12). Grade 1 local reactions following injection were the only side effects. CONCLUSION: Outcome in our study rather depended on liver function and intrahepatic tumor growth (presence of liver cirrhosis and Okuda stage) in addition to response to thymostimulin, while an invasive HCC phenotype had no influence in the multivariate analysis. Thymostimulin could therefore be considered a safe and promising candidate for palliative treatment in a selected target population with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, in particular as component of a multimodal therapy concept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29319366.
format Text
id pubmed-2323008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23230082008-04-18 Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial Dollinger, Matthias M Behrens, Christa M Lesske, Joachim Behl, Susanne Behrmann, Curd Fleig, Wolfgang E BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Thymostimulin is a thymic peptide fraction with immune-mediated cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro. In a phase II trial, we investigated safety and efficacy including selection criteria for best response in advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: 44 patients (84 % male, median age 69 years) not suitable or refractory to conventional therapy received thymostimulin 75 mg subcutaneously five times per week for a median of 8.2 months until progression or complete response. 3/44 patients were secondarily accessible to local ablation or chemoembolisation. Primary endpoint was overall survival, secondary endpoint tumor response or progression-free survival. A multivariate Cox's regression model was used to identify variables affecting survival. RESULTS: Median survival was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.9–15.0) with a 1-, 2- and 3-year survival of 50%, 23% and 9%. In the univariate analysis, a low Child-Pugh-score (p = 0.01), a low score in the Okuda- and CLIP-classification (p < 0.001) or a low AFP-level (p < 0.001) were associated with better survival, but not therapy modalities other than thymostimulin (p = 0.1) or signs of an invasive HCC phenotype such as vascular invasion (p = 0.3) and metastases (p = 0.1). The only variables independently related to survival in the Cox's regression model were Okuda stage and presence of liver cirrhosis (p < 0.01) as well as response to thymostimulin (p < 0.05). Of 39/44 patients evaluable for response, two obtained complete responses (one after concomitant radiofrequency ablation), five partial responses (objective response 18%), twenty-four stable disease (tumor control rate 79%) and eight progressed. Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (95% CI 0.8–12). Grade 1 local reactions following injection were the only side effects. CONCLUSION: Outcome in our study rather depended on liver function and intrahepatic tumor growth (presence of liver cirrhosis and Okuda stage) in addition to response to thymostimulin, while an invasive HCC phenotype had no influence in the multivariate analysis. Thymostimulin could therefore be considered a safe and promising candidate for palliative treatment in a selected target population with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, in particular as component of a multimodal therapy concept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29319366. BioMed Central 2008-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2323008/ /pubmed/18366627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-72 Text en Copyright © 2008 Dollinger et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dollinger, Matthias M
Behrens, Christa M
Lesske, Joachim
Behl, Susanne
Behrmann, Curd
Fleig, Wolfgang E
Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial
title Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial
title_full Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial
title_fullStr Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial
title_full_unstemmed Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial
title_short Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial
title_sort thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase ii trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18366627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-72
work_keys_str_mv AT dollingermatthiasm thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial
AT behrenschristam thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial
AT lesskejoachim thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial
AT behlsusanne thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial
AT behrmanncurd thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial
AT fleigwolfgange thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial