Cargando…
Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial
BACKGROUND: Thymostimulin is a thymic peptide fraction with immune-mediated cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro. In a phase II trial, we investigated safety and efficacy including selection criteria for best response in advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: 4...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18366627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-72 |
_version_ | 1782152613732548608 |
---|---|
author | Dollinger, Matthias M Behrens, Christa M Lesske, Joachim Behl, Susanne Behrmann, Curd Fleig, Wolfgang E |
author_facet | Dollinger, Matthias M Behrens, Christa M Lesske, Joachim Behl, Susanne Behrmann, Curd Fleig, Wolfgang E |
author_sort | Dollinger, Matthias M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Thymostimulin is a thymic peptide fraction with immune-mediated cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro. In a phase II trial, we investigated safety and efficacy including selection criteria for best response in advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: 44 patients (84 % male, median age 69 years) not suitable or refractory to conventional therapy received thymostimulin 75 mg subcutaneously five times per week for a median of 8.2 months until progression or complete response. 3/44 patients were secondarily accessible to local ablation or chemoembolisation. Primary endpoint was overall survival, secondary endpoint tumor response or progression-free survival. A multivariate Cox's regression model was used to identify variables affecting survival. RESULTS: Median survival was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.9–15.0) with a 1-, 2- and 3-year survival of 50%, 23% and 9%. In the univariate analysis, a low Child-Pugh-score (p = 0.01), a low score in the Okuda- and CLIP-classification (p < 0.001) or a low AFP-level (p < 0.001) were associated with better survival, but not therapy modalities other than thymostimulin (p = 0.1) or signs of an invasive HCC phenotype such as vascular invasion (p = 0.3) and metastases (p = 0.1). The only variables independently related to survival in the Cox's regression model were Okuda stage and presence of liver cirrhosis (p < 0.01) as well as response to thymostimulin (p < 0.05). Of 39/44 patients evaluable for response, two obtained complete responses (one after concomitant radiofrequency ablation), five partial responses (objective response 18%), twenty-four stable disease (tumor control rate 79%) and eight progressed. Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (95% CI 0.8–12). Grade 1 local reactions following injection were the only side effects. CONCLUSION: Outcome in our study rather depended on liver function and intrahepatic tumor growth (presence of liver cirrhosis and Okuda stage) in addition to response to thymostimulin, while an invasive HCC phenotype had no influence in the multivariate analysis. Thymostimulin could therefore be considered a safe and promising candidate for palliative treatment in a selected target population with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, in particular as component of a multimodal therapy concept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29319366. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2323008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23230082008-04-18 Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial Dollinger, Matthias M Behrens, Christa M Lesske, Joachim Behl, Susanne Behrmann, Curd Fleig, Wolfgang E BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Thymostimulin is a thymic peptide fraction with immune-mediated cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro. In a phase II trial, we investigated safety and efficacy including selection criteria for best response in advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: 44 patients (84 % male, median age 69 years) not suitable or refractory to conventional therapy received thymostimulin 75 mg subcutaneously five times per week for a median of 8.2 months until progression or complete response. 3/44 patients were secondarily accessible to local ablation or chemoembolisation. Primary endpoint was overall survival, secondary endpoint tumor response or progression-free survival. A multivariate Cox's regression model was used to identify variables affecting survival. RESULTS: Median survival was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.9–15.0) with a 1-, 2- and 3-year survival of 50%, 23% and 9%. In the univariate analysis, a low Child-Pugh-score (p = 0.01), a low score in the Okuda- and CLIP-classification (p < 0.001) or a low AFP-level (p < 0.001) were associated with better survival, but not therapy modalities other than thymostimulin (p = 0.1) or signs of an invasive HCC phenotype such as vascular invasion (p = 0.3) and metastases (p = 0.1). The only variables independently related to survival in the Cox's regression model were Okuda stage and presence of liver cirrhosis (p < 0.01) as well as response to thymostimulin (p < 0.05). Of 39/44 patients evaluable for response, two obtained complete responses (one after concomitant radiofrequency ablation), five partial responses (objective response 18%), twenty-four stable disease (tumor control rate 79%) and eight progressed. Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (95% CI 0.8–12). Grade 1 local reactions following injection were the only side effects. CONCLUSION: Outcome in our study rather depended on liver function and intrahepatic tumor growth (presence of liver cirrhosis and Okuda stage) in addition to response to thymostimulin, while an invasive HCC phenotype had no influence in the multivariate analysis. Thymostimulin could therefore be considered a safe and promising candidate for palliative treatment in a selected target population with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, in particular as component of a multimodal therapy concept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29319366. BioMed Central 2008-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2323008/ /pubmed/18366627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-72 Text en Copyright © 2008 Dollinger et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dollinger, Matthias M Behrens, Christa M Lesske, Joachim Behl, Susanne Behrmann, Curd Fleig, Wolfgang E Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial |
title | Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial |
title_full | Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial |
title_fullStr | Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial |
title_short | Thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II trial |
title_sort | thymostimulin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase ii trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18366627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-72 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dollingermatthiasm thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial AT behrenschristam thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial AT lesskejoachim thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial AT behlsusanne thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial AT behrmanncurd thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial AT fleigwolfgange thymostimulininadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaaphaseiitrial |