Cargando…

Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Malaria over-diagnosis in Africa is widespread and costly both financially and in terms of morbidity and mortality from missed diagnoses. An understanding of the reasons behind malaria over-diagnosis is urgently needed to inform strategies for better targeting of antimalarials. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandler, Clare IR, Jones, Caroline, Boniface, Gloria, Juma, Kaseem, Reyburn, Hugh, Whitty, Christopher JM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18384669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-53
_version_ 1782152616544829440
author Chandler, Clare IR
Jones, Caroline
Boniface, Gloria
Juma, Kaseem
Reyburn, Hugh
Whitty, Christopher JM
author_facet Chandler, Clare IR
Jones, Caroline
Boniface, Gloria
Juma, Kaseem
Reyburn, Hugh
Whitty, Christopher JM
author_sort Chandler, Clare IR
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malaria over-diagnosis in Africa is widespread and costly both financially and in terms of morbidity and mortality from missed diagnoses. An understanding of the reasons behind malaria over-diagnosis is urgently needed to inform strategies for better targeting of antimalarials. METHODS: In an ethnographic study of clinical practice in two hospitals in Tanzania, 2,082 patient consultations with 34 clinicians were observed over a period of three months at each hospital. All clinicians were also interviewed individually as well as being observed during routine working activities with colleagues. Interviews with five tutors and 10 clinical officer students at a nearby clinical officer training college were subsequently conducted. RESULTS: Four, primarily social, spheres of influence on malaria over-diagnosis were identified. Firstly, the influence of initial training within a context where the importance of malaria is strongly promoted. Secondly, the influence of peers, conforming to perceived expectations from colleagues. Thirdly, pressure to conform with perceived patient preferences. Lastly, quality of diagnostic support, involving resource management, motivation and supervision. Rather than following national guidelines for the diagnosis of febrile illness, clinician behaviour appeared to follow 'mindlines': shared rationales constructed from these different spheres of influence. Three mindlines were identified in this setting: malaria is easier to diagnose than alternative diseases; malaria is a more acceptable diagnosis; and missing malaria is indefensible. These mindlines were apparent during the training stages as well as throughout clinical careers. CONCLUSION: Clinicians were found to follow mindlines as well as or rather than guidelines, which incorporated multiple social influences operating in the immediate and the wider context of decision making. Interventions to move mindlines closer to guidelines need to take the variety of social influences into account.
format Text
id pubmed-2323020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23230202008-04-18 Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study Chandler, Clare IR Jones, Caroline Boniface, Gloria Juma, Kaseem Reyburn, Hugh Whitty, Christopher JM Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Malaria over-diagnosis in Africa is widespread and costly both financially and in terms of morbidity and mortality from missed diagnoses. An understanding of the reasons behind malaria over-diagnosis is urgently needed to inform strategies for better targeting of antimalarials. METHODS: In an ethnographic study of clinical practice in two hospitals in Tanzania, 2,082 patient consultations with 34 clinicians were observed over a period of three months at each hospital. All clinicians were also interviewed individually as well as being observed during routine working activities with colleagues. Interviews with five tutors and 10 clinical officer students at a nearby clinical officer training college were subsequently conducted. RESULTS: Four, primarily social, spheres of influence on malaria over-diagnosis were identified. Firstly, the influence of initial training within a context where the importance of malaria is strongly promoted. Secondly, the influence of peers, conforming to perceived expectations from colleagues. Thirdly, pressure to conform with perceived patient preferences. Lastly, quality of diagnostic support, involving resource management, motivation and supervision. Rather than following national guidelines for the diagnosis of febrile illness, clinician behaviour appeared to follow 'mindlines': shared rationales constructed from these different spheres of influence. Three mindlines were identified in this setting: malaria is easier to diagnose than alternative diseases; malaria is a more acceptable diagnosis; and missing malaria is indefensible. These mindlines were apparent during the training stages as well as throughout clinical careers. CONCLUSION: Clinicians were found to follow mindlines as well as or rather than guidelines, which incorporated multiple social influences operating in the immediate and the wider context of decision making. Interventions to move mindlines closer to guidelines need to take the variety of social influences into account. BioMed Central 2008-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2323020/ /pubmed/18384669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-53 Text en Copyright © 2008 Chandler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chandler, Clare IR
Jones, Caroline
Boniface, Gloria
Juma, Kaseem
Reyburn, Hugh
Whitty, Christopher JM
Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study
title Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study
title_full Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study
title_fullStr Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study
title_short Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study
title_sort guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in tanzania? a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18384669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-53
work_keys_str_mv AT chandlerclareir guidelinesandmindlineswhydoclinicalstaffoverdiagnosemalariaintanzaniaaqualitativestudy
AT jonescaroline guidelinesandmindlineswhydoclinicalstaffoverdiagnosemalariaintanzaniaaqualitativestudy
AT bonifacegloria guidelinesandmindlineswhydoclinicalstaffoverdiagnosemalariaintanzaniaaqualitativestudy
AT jumakaseem guidelinesandmindlineswhydoclinicalstaffoverdiagnosemalariaintanzaniaaqualitativestudy
AT reyburnhugh guidelinesandmindlineswhydoclinicalstaffoverdiagnosemalariaintanzaniaaqualitativestudy
AT whittychristopherjm guidelinesandmindlineswhydoclinicalstaffoverdiagnosemalariaintanzaniaaqualitativestudy