Cargando…

Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment

BACKGROUND: We spend most of our lives in indoor environments and are exposed to microbes present in these environments. Hence, knowledge about this exposure is important for understanding how it impacts on human health. However, the bacterial flora in indoor environments has been only fragmentarily...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rintala, Helena, Pitkäranta, Miia, Toivola, Mika, Paulin, Lars, Nevalainen, Aino
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18397514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-56
_version_ 1782152644665540608
author Rintala, Helena
Pitkäranta, Miia
Toivola, Mika
Paulin, Lars
Nevalainen, Aino
author_facet Rintala, Helena
Pitkäranta, Miia
Toivola, Mika
Paulin, Lars
Nevalainen, Aino
author_sort Rintala, Helena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We spend most of our lives in indoor environments and are exposed to microbes present in these environments. Hence, knowledge about this exposure is important for understanding how it impacts on human health. However, the bacterial flora in indoor environments has been only fragmentarily explored and mostly using culture methods. The application of molecular methods previously utilised in other environments has resulted in a substantial increase in our awareness of microbial diversity. RESULTS: The composition and dynamics of indoor dust bacterial flora were investigated in two buildings over a period of one year. Four samples were taken in each building, corresponding to the four seasons, and 16S rDNA libraries were constructed. A total of 893 clones were analysed and 283 distinct operational taxonomic units (OTUs) detected among them using 97% sequence similarity as the criterion. All libraries were dominated by Gram-positive sequences, with the most abundant phylum being Firmicutes. Four OTUs having high similarity to Corynebacterium-, Propionibacterium-, Streptococcus- and Staphylococcus- sequences were present in all samples. The most abundant of the Gram-negative OTUs were members of the family Sphingomonadaceae, followed by Oxalobacteraceae, Comamonadaceae, Neisseriaceae and Rhizobiaceae. The relative abundance of alpha- and betaproteobacteria increased slightly towards summer at the expense of firmicutes. The proportion of firmicutes and gammaproteobacteria of the total diversity was highest in winter and that of actinobacteria, alpha- and betaproteobacteria in spring or summer, whereas the diversity of bacteroidetes peaked in fall. A statistical comparison of the libraries revealed that the bacterial flora of the two buildings differed during all seasons except spring, but differences between seasons within one building were not that clear, indicating that differences between the buildings were greater than the differences between seasons. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrated that the bacterial flora of indoor dust is complex and dominated by Gram-positive species. The dominant phylotypes most probably originated from users of the building. Seasonal variation was observed as proportional changes of the phyla and at the species level. The microflora of the two buildings investigated differed statistically and differences between the buildings were more pronounced than differences between seasons.
format Text
id pubmed-2323381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23233812008-04-19 Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment Rintala, Helena Pitkäranta, Miia Toivola, Mika Paulin, Lars Nevalainen, Aino BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: We spend most of our lives in indoor environments and are exposed to microbes present in these environments. Hence, knowledge about this exposure is important for understanding how it impacts on human health. However, the bacterial flora in indoor environments has been only fragmentarily explored and mostly using culture methods. The application of molecular methods previously utilised in other environments has resulted in a substantial increase in our awareness of microbial diversity. RESULTS: The composition and dynamics of indoor dust bacterial flora were investigated in two buildings over a period of one year. Four samples were taken in each building, corresponding to the four seasons, and 16S rDNA libraries were constructed. A total of 893 clones were analysed and 283 distinct operational taxonomic units (OTUs) detected among them using 97% sequence similarity as the criterion. All libraries were dominated by Gram-positive sequences, with the most abundant phylum being Firmicutes. Four OTUs having high similarity to Corynebacterium-, Propionibacterium-, Streptococcus- and Staphylococcus- sequences were present in all samples. The most abundant of the Gram-negative OTUs were members of the family Sphingomonadaceae, followed by Oxalobacteraceae, Comamonadaceae, Neisseriaceae and Rhizobiaceae. The relative abundance of alpha- and betaproteobacteria increased slightly towards summer at the expense of firmicutes. The proportion of firmicutes and gammaproteobacteria of the total diversity was highest in winter and that of actinobacteria, alpha- and betaproteobacteria in spring or summer, whereas the diversity of bacteroidetes peaked in fall. A statistical comparison of the libraries revealed that the bacterial flora of the two buildings differed during all seasons except spring, but differences between seasons within one building were not that clear, indicating that differences between the buildings were greater than the differences between seasons. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrated that the bacterial flora of indoor dust is complex and dominated by Gram-positive species. The dominant phylotypes most probably originated from users of the building. Seasonal variation was observed as proportional changes of the phyla and at the species level. The microflora of the two buildings investigated differed statistically and differences between the buildings were more pronounced than differences between seasons. BioMed Central 2008-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2323381/ /pubmed/18397514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-56 Text en Copyright © 2008 Rintala et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rintala, Helena
Pitkäranta, Miia
Toivola, Mika
Paulin, Lars
Nevalainen, Aino
Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment
title Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment
title_full Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment
title_fullStr Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment
title_full_unstemmed Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment
title_short Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment
title_sort diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18397514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-56
work_keys_str_mv AT rintalahelena diversityandseasonaldynamicsofbacterialcommunityinindoorenvironment
AT pitkarantamiia diversityandseasonaldynamicsofbacterialcommunityinindoorenvironment
AT toivolamika diversityandseasonaldynamicsofbacterialcommunityinindoorenvironment
AT paulinlars diversityandseasonaldynamicsofbacterialcommunityinindoorenvironment
AT nevalainenaino diversityandseasonaldynamicsofbacterialcommunityinindoorenvironment