Cargando…
Assessing the order of magnitude of outcomes in single-arm cohorts through systematic comparison with corresponding cohorts: An example from the AMOS study
BACKGROUND: When a therapy has been evaluated in the first clinical study, the outcome is often compared descriptively to outcomes in corresponding cohorts receiving other treatments. Such comparisons are often limited to selected studies, and often mix different outcomes and follow-up periods. Here...
Autores principales: | Hamre, Harald J, Glockmann, Anja, Tröger, Wilfried, Kienle, Gunver S, Kiene, Helmut |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18366683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-11 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Overview of the Publications From the Anthroposophic Medicine Outcomes Study (AMOS): A Whole System Evaluation Study
por: Hamre, Harald Johan, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Combined bias suppression in single-arm therapy studies
por: Hamre, Harald J, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Long-term outcomes of anthroposophic treatment for chronic disease: a four-year follow-up analysis of 1510 patients from a prospective observational study in routine outpatient settings
por: Hamre, Harald Johan, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Outcome of anthroposophic medication therapy in chronic disease: A 12-month prospective cohort study
por: Hamre, Harald J, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Anthroposophic therapy for children with chronic disease: a two-year prospective cohort study in routine outpatient settings
por: Hamre, Harald J, et al.
Publicado: (2009)