Cargando…
‘Miracle stents’ - a future without restenosis
Over the last three decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technology has revolutionized the field of cardiology. PCI began in the form of balloon angioplasty, and was followed by coronary stenting. In-Stent restenosis is the main limitation of coronary stenting, and has been delayed to s...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
McGill University
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18523610 |
_version_ | 1782152656336191488 |
---|---|
author | Hamid, Huda Coltart, John |
author_facet | Hamid, Huda Coltart, John |
author_sort | Hamid, Huda |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the last three decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technology has revolutionized the field of cardiology. PCI began in the form of balloon angioplasty, and was followed by coronary stenting. In-Stent restenosis is the main limitation of coronary stenting, and has been delayed to some extent by the development of drug eluting stents. Coronary angioplasty with stenting is currently the most popular non-medical treatment of coronary artery disease therefore solving the problem of in-stent restenosis could change the future role of other types of coronary intervention. This review examines the types of percutaneous coronary interventions, the mechanisms leading up to in-stent restenosis, and how previous and current treatments of in-stent restenosis influence the vascular response to injury. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2323487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | McGill University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23234872008-06-03 ‘Miracle stents’ - a future without restenosis Hamid, Huda Coltart, John Mcgill J Med Review Articles Over the last three decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technology has revolutionized the field of cardiology. PCI began in the form of balloon angioplasty, and was followed by coronary stenting. In-Stent restenosis is the main limitation of coronary stenting, and has been delayed to some extent by the development of drug eluting stents. Coronary angioplasty with stenting is currently the most popular non-medical treatment of coronary artery disease therefore solving the problem of in-stent restenosis could change the future role of other types of coronary intervention. This review examines the types of percutaneous coronary interventions, the mechanisms leading up to in-stent restenosis, and how previous and current treatments of in-stent restenosis influence the vascular response to injury. McGill University 2007-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2323487/ /pubmed/18523610 Text en Copyright © 2007 by MJM |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Hamid, Huda Coltart, John ‘Miracle stents’ - a future without restenosis |
title | ‘Miracle stents’ - a future without restenosis |
title_full | ‘Miracle stents’ - a future without restenosis |
title_fullStr | ‘Miracle stents’ - a future without restenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Miracle stents’ - a future without restenosis |
title_short | ‘Miracle stents’ - a future without restenosis |
title_sort | ‘miracle stents’ - a future without restenosis |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18523610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamidhuda miraclestentsafuturewithoutrestenosis AT coltartjohn miraclestentsafuturewithoutrestenosis |