Cargando…

Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model

We systematically evaluated a variety of MR spiral imaging acquisition and reconstruction schemes using a computational perceptual difference model (PDM) that models the ability of humans to perceive a visual difference between a degraded “fast” MRI image with subsampling of k-space and a “gold stan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huo, Donglai, Salem, Kyle A., Jiang, Yuhao, Wilson, David L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2324044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23165025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/35290
_version_ 1782152706906914816
author Huo, Donglai
Salem, Kyle A.
Jiang, Yuhao
Wilson, David L.
author_facet Huo, Donglai
Salem, Kyle A.
Jiang, Yuhao
Wilson, David L.
author_sort Huo, Donglai
collection PubMed
description We systematically evaluated a variety of MR spiral imaging acquisition and reconstruction schemes using a computational perceptual difference model (PDM) that models the ability of humans to perceive a visual difference between a degraded “fast” MRI image with subsampling of k-space and a “gold standard” image mimicking full acquisition. Human subject experiments performed using a modified double-stimulus continuous-quality scale (DSCQS) correlated well with PDM, over a variety of images. In a smaller set of conditions, PDM scores agreed very well with human detectability measurements of image quality. Having validated the technique, PDM was used to systematically evaluate 2016 spiral image conditions (six interleave patterns, seven sampling densities, three density compensation schemes, four reconstruction methods, and four noise levels). Voronoi (VOR) with conventional regridding gave the best reconstructions. At a fixed sampling density, more interleaves gave better results. With noise present more interleaves and samples were desirable. With PDM, conditions were determined where equivalent image quality was obtained with 50% sampling in noise-free conditions. We conclude that PDM scoring provides an objective, useful tool for the assessment of fast MR image quality that can greatly aid the design of MR acquisition and signal processing strategies.
format Text
id pubmed-2324044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23240442008-04-22 Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model Huo, Donglai Salem, Kyle A. Jiang, Yuhao Wilson, David L. Int J Biomed Imaging Article We systematically evaluated a variety of MR spiral imaging acquisition and reconstruction schemes using a computational perceptual difference model (PDM) that models the ability of humans to perceive a visual difference between a degraded “fast” MRI image with subsampling of k-space and a “gold standard” image mimicking full acquisition. Human subject experiments performed using a modified double-stimulus continuous-quality scale (DSCQS) correlated well with PDM, over a variety of images. In a smaller set of conditions, PDM scores agreed very well with human detectability measurements of image quality. Having validated the technique, PDM was used to systematically evaluate 2016 spiral image conditions (six interleave patterns, seven sampling densities, three density compensation schemes, four reconstruction methods, and four noise levels). Voronoi (VOR) with conventional regridding gave the best reconstructions. At a fixed sampling density, more interleaves gave better results. With noise present more interleaves and samples were desirable. With PDM, conditions were determined where equivalent image quality was obtained with 50% sampling in noise-free conditions. We conclude that PDM scoring provides an objective, useful tool for the assessment of fast MR image quality that can greatly aid the design of MR acquisition and signal processing strategies. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2006 2006-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2324044/ /pubmed/23165025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/35290 Text en Copyright © 2006 D. Huo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Huo, Donglai
Salem, Kyle A.
Jiang, Yuhao
Wilson, David L.
Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model
title Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model
title_full Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model
title_fullStr Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model
title_short Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model
title_sort optimization of spiral mri using a perceptual difference model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2324044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23165025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/35290
work_keys_str_mv AT huodonglai optimizationofspiralmriusingaperceptualdifferencemodel
AT salemkylea optimizationofspiralmriusingaperceptualdifferencemodel
AT jiangyuhao optimizationofspiralmriusingaperceptualdifferencemodel
AT wilsondavidl optimizationofspiralmriusingaperceptualdifferencemodel