Cargando…

Reciprocal Benefits of Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Modeling in Brain Mapping: Applications to Event-Related Functional MRI, H(2) (15)O-, and FDG-PET

In brain mapping studies of sensory, cognitive, and motor operations, specific waveforms of dynamic neural activity are predicted based on theoretical models of human information processing. For example in event-related functional MRI (fMRI), the general linear model (GLM) is employed in mass-univar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moeller, James R., Habeck, Christian G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2324050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23165047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/79862
_version_ 1782152708365484032
author Moeller, James R.
Habeck, Christian G.
author_facet Moeller, James R.
Habeck, Christian G.
author_sort Moeller, James R.
collection PubMed
description In brain mapping studies of sensory, cognitive, and motor operations, specific waveforms of dynamic neural activity are predicted based on theoretical models of human information processing. For example in event-related functional MRI (fMRI), the general linear model (GLM) is employed in mass-univariate analyses to identify the regions whose dynamic activity closely matches the expected waveforms. By comparison multivariate analyses based on PCA or ICA provide greater flexibility in detecting spatiotemporal properties of experimental data that may strongly support alternative neuroscientific explanations. We investigated conjoint multivariate and mass-univariate analyses that combine the capabilities to (1) verify activation of neural machinery we already understand and (2) discover reliable signatures of new neural machinery. We examined combinations of GLM and PCA that recover latent neural signals (waveforms and footprints) with greater accuracy than either method alone. Comparative results are illustrated with analyses of real fMRI data, adding to Monte Carlo simulation support.
format Text
id pubmed-2324050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23240502008-04-22 Reciprocal Benefits of Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Modeling in Brain Mapping: Applications to Event-Related Functional MRI, H(2) (15)O-, and FDG-PET Moeller, James R. Habeck, Christian G. Int J Biomed Imaging Article In brain mapping studies of sensory, cognitive, and motor operations, specific waveforms of dynamic neural activity are predicted based on theoretical models of human information processing. For example in event-related functional MRI (fMRI), the general linear model (GLM) is employed in mass-univariate analyses to identify the regions whose dynamic activity closely matches the expected waveforms. By comparison multivariate analyses based on PCA or ICA provide greater flexibility in detecting spatiotemporal properties of experimental data that may strongly support alternative neuroscientific explanations. We investigated conjoint multivariate and mass-univariate analyses that combine the capabilities to (1) verify activation of neural machinery we already understand and (2) discover reliable signatures of new neural machinery. We examined combinations of GLM and PCA that recover latent neural signals (waveforms and footprints) with greater accuracy than either method alone. Comparative results are illustrated with analyses of real fMRI data, adding to Monte Carlo simulation support. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2006 2006-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2324050/ /pubmed/23165047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/79862 Text en Copyright © IJBI J. Moeller and C. Habeck https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Moeller, James R.
Habeck, Christian G.
Reciprocal Benefits of Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Modeling in Brain Mapping: Applications to Event-Related Functional MRI, H(2) (15)O-, and FDG-PET
title Reciprocal Benefits of Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Modeling in Brain Mapping: Applications to Event-Related Functional MRI, H(2) (15)O-, and FDG-PET
title_full Reciprocal Benefits of Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Modeling in Brain Mapping: Applications to Event-Related Functional MRI, H(2) (15)O-, and FDG-PET
title_fullStr Reciprocal Benefits of Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Modeling in Brain Mapping: Applications to Event-Related Functional MRI, H(2) (15)O-, and FDG-PET
title_full_unstemmed Reciprocal Benefits of Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Modeling in Brain Mapping: Applications to Event-Related Functional MRI, H(2) (15)O-, and FDG-PET
title_short Reciprocal Benefits of Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Modeling in Brain Mapping: Applications to Event-Related Functional MRI, H(2) (15)O-, and FDG-PET
title_sort reciprocal benefits of mass-univariate and multivariate modeling in brain mapping: applications to event-related functional mri, h(2) (15)o-, and fdg-pet
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2324050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23165047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/79862
work_keys_str_mv AT moellerjamesr reciprocalbenefitsofmassunivariateandmultivariatemodelinginbrainmappingapplicationstoeventrelatedfunctionalmrih215oandfdgpet
AT habeckchristiang reciprocalbenefitsofmassunivariateandmultivariatemodelinginbrainmappingapplicationstoeventrelatedfunctionalmrih215oandfdgpet