Cargando…

The RGS gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster

BACKGROUND: The loco gene encodes several different isoforms of a regulator of G-protein signalling. These different isoforms of LOCO are part of a pathway enabling cells to respond to external signals. LOCO is known to be required at various developmental stages including neuroblast division, glial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGurk, Leeanne, Pathirana, Stephen, Rothwell, Kathleen, Trimbuch, Thorsten, Colombini, Paolo, Yu, Fengwei, Chia, William, Bownes, Mary
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2324087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18387173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-8-37
_version_ 1782152715237851136
author McGurk, Leeanne
Pathirana, Stephen
Rothwell, Kathleen
Trimbuch, Thorsten
Colombini, Paolo
Yu, Fengwei
Chia, William
Bownes, Mary
author_facet McGurk, Leeanne
Pathirana, Stephen
Rothwell, Kathleen
Trimbuch, Thorsten
Colombini, Paolo
Yu, Fengwei
Chia, William
Bownes, Mary
author_sort McGurk, Leeanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The loco gene encodes several different isoforms of a regulator of G-protein signalling. These different isoforms of LOCO are part of a pathway enabling cells to respond to external signals. LOCO is known to be required at various developmental stages including neuroblast division, glial cell formation and oogenesis. Less is known about LOCO and its involvement in male development therefore to gain further insight into the role of LOCO in development we carried out a genetic screen and analysed males with reduced fertility. RESULTS: We identified a number of lethal loco mutants and four semi-lethal lines, which generate males with reduced fertility. We have identified a fifth loco transcript and show that it is differentially expressed in developing pupae. We have characterised the expression pattern of all loco transcripts during pupal development in the adult testes, both in wild type and loco mutant strains. In addition we also show that there are various G-protein α subunits expressed in the testis all of which may be potential binding partners of LOCO. CONCLUSION: We propose that the male sterility in the new loco mutants result from a failure of accurate morphogenesis of the adult reproductive system during metamorphosis, we propose that this is due to a loss of expression of loco c3. Thus, we conclude that specific isoforms of loco are required for the differentiation of the male gonad and genital disc.
format Text
id pubmed-2324087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23240872008-04-22 The RGS gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster McGurk, Leeanne Pathirana, Stephen Rothwell, Kathleen Trimbuch, Thorsten Colombini, Paolo Yu, Fengwei Chia, William Bownes, Mary BMC Dev Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The loco gene encodes several different isoforms of a regulator of G-protein signalling. These different isoforms of LOCO are part of a pathway enabling cells to respond to external signals. LOCO is known to be required at various developmental stages including neuroblast division, glial cell formation and oogenesis. Less is known about LOCO and its involvement in male development therefore to gain further insight into the role of LOCO in development we carried out a genetic screen and analysed males with reduced fertility. RESULTS: We identified a number of lethal loco mutants and four semi-lethal lines, which generate males with reduced fertility. We have identified a fifth loco transcript and show that it is differentially expressed in developing pupae. We have characterised the expression pattern of all loco transcripts during pupal development in the adult testes, both in wild type and loco mutant strains. In addition we also show that there are various G-protein α subunits expressed in the testis all of which may be potential binding partners of LOCO. CONCLUSION: We propose that the male sterility in the new loco mutants result from a failure of accurate morphogenesis of the adult reproductive system during metamorphosis, we propose that this is due to a loss of expression of loco c3. Thus, we conclude that specific isoforms of loco are required for the differentiation of the male gonad and genital disc. BioMed Central 2008-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2324087/ /pubmed/18387173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-8-37 Text en Copyright © 2008 McGurk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McGurk, Leeanne
Pathirana, Stephen
Rothwell, Kathleen
Trimbuch, Thorsten
Colombini, Paolo
Yu, Fengwei
Chia, William
Bownes, Mary
The RGS gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster
title The RGS gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full The RGS gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_fullStr The RGS gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full_unstemmed The RGS gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_short The RGS gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster
title_sort rgs gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in drosophila melanogaster
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2324087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18387173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-8-37
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgurkleeanne thergsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT pathiranastephen thergsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT rothwellkathleen thergsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT trimbuchthorsten thergsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT colombinipaolo thergsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT yufengwei thergsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT chiawilliam thergsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT bownesmary thergsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT mcgurkleeanne rgsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT pathiranastephen rgsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT rothwellkathleen rgsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT trimbuchthorsten rgsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT colombinipaolo rgsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT yufengwei rgsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT chiawilliam rgsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster
AT bownesmary rgsgenelocoisessentialformalereproductivesystemdifferentiationindrosophilamelanogaster