Cargando…

Host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage

Inactivation of bacteriophage lambda CI repressor leads almost exclusively to lytic development. Prophage induction can be initiated either by DNA damage or by heat treatment of a temperature-sensitive repressor. These two treatments also cause a concurrent activation of either the host SOS or heat-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rokney, Assaf, Kobiler, Oren, Amir, Amnon, Court, Donald L, Stavans, Joel, Adhya, Sankar, Oppenheim, Amos B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2327240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18298445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06119.x
_version_ 1782152737776992256
author Rokney, Assaf
Kobiler, Oren
Amir, Amnon
Court, Donald L
Stavans, Joel
Adhya, Sankar
Oppenheim, Amos B
author_facet Rokney, Assaf
Kobiler, Oren
Amir, Amnon
Court, Donald L
Stavans, Joel
Adhya, Sankar
Oppenheim, Amos B
author_sort Rokney, Assaf
collection PubMed
description Inactivation of bacteriophage lambda CI repressor leads almost exclusively to lytic development. Prophage induction can be initiated either by DNA damage or by heat treatment of a temperature-sensitive repressor. These two treatments also cause a concurrent activation of either the host SOS or heat-shock stress responses respectively. We studied the effects of these two methods of induction on the lytic pathway by monitoring the activation of different lambda promoters, and found that the lambda genetic network co-ordinates information from the host stress response networks. Our results show that the function of the CII transcriptional activator, which facilitates the lysogenic developmental pathway, is not observed following either method of induction. Mutations in the cro gene restore the CII function irrespective of the induction method. Deletion of the heat-shock protease gene ftsH can also restore CII function following heat induction but not following SOS induction. Our findings highlight the importance of the elimination of CII function during induction as a way to ensure an efficient lytic outcome. We also show that, despite the common inhibitory effect on CII function, there are significant differences in the heat- and SOS-induced pathways leading to the lytic cascade.
format Text
id pubmed-2327240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23272402008-04-30 Host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage Rokney, Assaf Kobiler, Oren Amir, Amnon Court, Donald L Stavans, Joel Adhya, Sankar Oppenheim, Amos B Mol Microbiol Research Articles Inactivation of bacteriophage lambda CI repressor leads almost exclusively to lytic development. Prophage induction can be initiated either by DNA damage or by heat treatment of a temperature-sensitive repressor. These two treatments also cause a concurrent activation of either the host SOS or heat-shock stress responses respectively. We studied the effects of these two methods of induction on the lytic pathway by monitoring the activation of different lambda promoters, and found that the lambda genetic network co-ordinates information from the host stress response networks. Our results show that the function of the CII transcriptional activator, which facilitates the lysogenic developmental pathway, is not observed following either method of induction. Mutations in the cro gene restore the CII function irrespective of the induction method. Deletion of the heat-shock protease gene ftsH can also restore CII function following heat induction but not following SOS induction. Our findings highlight the importance of the elimination of CII function during induction as a way to ensure an efficient lytic outcome. We also show that, despite the common inhibitory effect on CII function, there are significant differences in the heat- and SOS-induced pathways leading to the lytic cascade. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2327240/ /pubmed/18298445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06119.x Text en © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Rokney, Assaf
Kobiler, Oren
Amir, Amnon
Court, Donald L
Stavans, Joel
Adhya, Sankar
Oppenheim, Amos B
Host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage
title Host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage
title_full Host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage
title_fullStr Host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage
title_full_unstemmed Host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage
title_short Host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage
title_sort host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2327240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18298445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06119.x
work_keys_str_mv AT rokneyassaf hostresponsesinfluenceontheinductionoflambdaprophage
AT kobileroren hostresponsesinfluenceontheinductionoflambdaprophage
AT amiramnon hostresponsesinfluenceontheinductionoflambdaprophage
AT courtdonaldl hostresponsesinfluenceontheinductionoflambdaprophage
AT stavansjoel hostresponsesinfluenceontheinductionoflambdaprophage
AT adhyasankar hostresponsesinfluenceontheinductionoflambdaprophage
AT oppenheimamosb hostresponsesinfluenceontheinductionoflambdaprophage